Beercat
Loc: Central Coast of California
The NAACP .............
Why?
Because they accepted millions of dollars from this guy over the years knowing he had issues of color. They even gave this guy many awards .............
Donald knew what he was doing, buying awards to counter his image ............
The NAACP knew what they were doing as well ........... shameful ....... despicable
Last night on the news I saw where the NAACP is still willing to forgive Donald Sterling if he atones. Or is it atone$$$$$$$$$?
Dennis
The whole thing as far as I'm concerned is a bunch of BVLLSHIT !!!
What he said - if he actually did, (they don't want to seem to actually prove it) - is NOT against the law.. Its called FREE SPEECH !! May not be proper or moral to say, but its sure as hell is not illegal...
To me, the "Pure ones", want to change what is not morally proper into "guilty as hell illegal" action...
Oh, and the NAACP ?? They sure as hell don't have any room to start shaking their finger at someone else !
Double standard society ???
Beercat
Loc: Central Coast of California
donrent wrote:
The whole thing as far as I'm concerned is a bunch of BVLLSHIT !!!
What he said - if he actually did, (they don't want to seem to actually prove it) - is NOT against the law.. Its called FREE SPEECH !! May not be proper or moral to say, but its sure as hell is not illegal...
To me, the "Pure ones", want to change what is not morally proper into "guilty as hell illegal" action...
Oh, and the NAACP ?? They sure as hell don't have any room to start shaking their finger at someone else !
Double standard society ???
The whole thing as far as I'm concerned is a bunch... (
show quote)
Donald has not denied the charge. Remember, this isn't a court room/trial ............ what was taped is admissible in this situation. Yes one had freedom of speech but be prepared to pay the cost of your statement ........ this isn't a free speech issue ....
Is Cliven Bundy one lucky dude, or what?
The pack of journalistic vultures dropped his story in a split second when they realized they could go for a billionaire.
Is this a great world, or what?
davefales wrote:
Is Cliven Bundy one lucky dude, or what?
The pack of journalistic vultures dropped his story in a split second when they realized they could go for a billionaire.
Is this a great world, or what?
That's why it's called, "News."
"News" is only what THEY choose to "report".
Tomorrow, they're yesterday's news.
I don't agree with what this Sterling guy said...it's deplorable...but I'm alarmed that the thought-police now have the power to ruin a person based on what they utter in private.
We should all shudder as not one of us is white as snow in this regard.
Anyone calling for this man's head on a platter is a hypocrite.
Let's keep going down the list...how about we ruin Spike Lee's career? He's publically said things equally as bad...where do we start with the head hunting?
By the way; here is the list of things you can do that WON'T get you banned from the NBA.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Sports/2014/04/29/8-Things-That-Wont-Get-You-Banned-by-the-NBA
I do not agree with what he said, but he has a right to his opinion. He did say it in a private conversation. Why was it being recorded? In California you need all parties consent to record. In my opinion, he was set up. I do not believe that the NBA should have any power to sanction him.
I agree, but the nazi libs, will not agree with you, I"m surprised they didnt ask for the death penality!!
DRC56 wrote:
I do not agree with what he said, but he has a right to his opinion. He did say it in a private conversation. Why was it being recorded? In California you need all parties consent to record. In my opinion, he was set up. I do not believe that the NBA should have any power to sanction him.
Beercat
Loc: Central Coast of California
DRC56 wrote:
I do not agree with what he said, but he has a right to his opinion. He did say it in a private conversation. Why was it being recorded? In California you need all parties consent to record. In my opinion, he was set up. I do not believe that the NBA should have any power to sanction him.
In California you need consent to make recordings legal in a court of law ............ this kangaroo court isn't a 'legal' court :wink:
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
Beercat wrote:
The NAACP .............
Why?
Because they accepted millions of dollars from this guy over the years knowing he had issues of color. They even gave this guy many awards .............
Donald knew what he was doing, buying awards to counter his image ............
The NAACP knew what they were doing as well ........... shameful ....... despicable
Gimmie a break. Is what the idiot said outrageous and rascist and wrong? Of course!!! It's worth a day or 2 at most of coverage. But there are far more important things going on that deserve much greater scrutiny, that are being ignored.What percentage of the population follows basketball anyway. How many out there know the the economy grew at the very slow pace of 0.1 % in the first quarter? Vs how many know what the fool ex owner of that team had for breakfast. As I said Gimmie a break
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.