marriage is between a man and a....
Feb 28, 2014 16:01:03 #
biblical marriage
Mar 1, 2014 18:59:34 #
Mar 1, 2014 19:05:04 #
papayanirvana wrote:
This is ridiculous and outdated. Women today have rights.
Mar 1, 2014 19:48:45 #
yes, that's my point... the Bible is out-dated and should not be taken literally.
Mar 1, 2014 19:53:52 #
Mar 2, 2014 13:18:50 #
Bangee5 wrote:
a.k.a. attack on Christianity. papayanirvana is fixated on Christians.
This not an attack on Christianity. It's reality.
Mar 2, 2014 13:19:20 #
papayanirvana wrote:
yes, that's my point... the Bible is out-dated and should not be taken literally.
The Bible was written by men inspired by their belief in a higher being.
Mar 2, 2014 14:06:22 #
papayanirvana wrote:
yes, that's my point... the Bible is out-dated and should not be taken literally.
papayanivana is out-dated and should not be taken literally, or even bothered with.
Your agenda is showing and it is boring
Mar 2, 2014 14:07:46 #
Collie lover wrote:
This not an attack on Christianity. It's reality.
Yes, that is what I said, the reality is that its an attack on Christians.
Mar 2, 2014 14:16:52 #
how is it an attack? I am attacking you by using your source for knowledge? Doesn't really make sense unless there is some hypocrisy involved.
I am just pointing out that the Bible does not, as claimed, define marriage exclusively as between a man and a woman.
I didn't make this stuff up... It is in the scripture that Christians say is THE word of GOD.
Maybe everything in 2000 year old texts should not be taken literally.
I am just pointing out that the Bible does not, as claimed, define marriage exclusively as between a man and a woman.
I didn't make this stuff up... It is in the scripture that Christians say is THE word of GOD.
Maybe everything in 2000 year old texts should not be taken literally.
Mar 2, 2014 15:02:42 #
papayanirvana wrote:
how is it an attack? I am attacking you by using your source for knowledge? Doesn't really make sense unless there is some hypocrisy involved.
I am just pointing out that the Bible does not, as claimed, define marriage exclusively as between a man and a woman.
I didn't make this stuff up... It is in the scripture that Christians say is THE word of GOD.
Maybe everything in 2000 year old texts should not be taken literally.
I am just pointing out that the Bible does not, as claimed, define marriage exclusively as between a man and a woman.
I didn't make this stuff up... It is in the scripture that Christians say is THE word of GOD.
Maybe everything in 2000 year old texts should not be taken literally.
The attack is coming from you... just what is your agenda?
Mar 2, 2014 15:15:01 #
Bangee5 wrote:
Yes, that is what I said, the reality is that its an attack on Christians.
Appears to me to be an attack on stupidity.
Mar 2, 2014 15:29:26 #
My agenda...let's see, in general I think people should mind their own business and not get involved in other peoples business. Why does it bother Christians so much what other people call their personal relationship?
Now my only problem with Christians is that they are basically "my-way-or-the-highway" Accept Jesus or go to hell. With the fundies... there is no middle ground... the actual words in the Bible, are the words of GOD.
I think here I am using Alinsky's 4th rule for radicals...
Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.
So when, someone says that GOD meant to have marriage be between a man and a woman... because you can see it is written here in the Bible... I merely point out that these other definitions of marriage also exist in the Bible which Christians say equals the word of GOD.
The problem you have is you see it as an attack on your faith. It is not, there's a lot of good stuff in the Bible and no doubt is was written by inspired men, but the Bible has also been modified to control populations through fear-based conditioning. My attack is on lack of tolerance for other viewpoints and blind faith.
Now my only problem with Christians is that they are basically "my-way-or-the-highway" Accept Jesus or go to hell. With the fundies... there is no middle ground... the actual words in the Bible, are the words of GOD.
I think here I am using Alinsky's 4th rule for radicals...
Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.
So when, someone says that GOD meant to have marriage be between a man and a woman... because you can see it is written here in the Bible... I merely point out that these other definitions of marriage also exist in the Bible which Christians say equals the word of GOD.
The problem you have is you see it as an attack on your faith. It is not, there's a lot of good stuff in the Bible and no doubt is was written by inspired men, but the Bible has also been modified to control populations through fear-based conditioning. My attack is on lack of tolerance for other viewpoints and blind faith.
Mar 2, 2014 15:56:14 #
papayanirvana wrote:
My agenda...let's see, in general I think people s... (show quote)
So, what it is is an attack on Christianity. You set the bait and when a Christian bites, you attack. Why else would you post sometime that has to do with the Christians beliefs. Shame on you you bad boy...
"I think people should mind their own business and not get involved in other peoples business." Does this apply to you as well?
Mar 2, 2014 16:47:19 #
why do you feel defensive bangee? are you afraid you're backing the wrong GOD?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.