Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sigma 150-500 or...
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Dec 25, 2013 11:08:29   #
Audwulf Loc: Golden State
 
A TC, even a good one, is extra glass between your lens, and the camera. I put a 2X on my Sig 18-250, and compared it with my my Sig 150-500. If you are going for quality, go with the 150-500, if you're going for economy, go with the TC.
Another Ron
rappar wrote:
I would like some added range for my Nikon. I have the 2.8 Nikon 70-200mm. If I purchase the TC-20E III AF-1 teleconverter for the lens it goes to 400 mm. I can also buy the Sigma 150-500mm lens that many here say is very good for the money. The difference here in Canada between the lens and the teleconverter is about $600. What do people here think might be the best way to go?
Thanks
Ron

Reply
Dec 25, 2013 16:36:04   #
rappar Loc: Kingston Ontario
 
Thanks to all who took the time to reply. I went with the Sigma and based on the first couple of times out, could not be happier.
Ron

Reply
Dec 25, 2013 16:46:56   #
JohnInBaltimore Loc: Greater Balto/DC area
 
I've not tried the teleconverter; you might also have a look at the Sigma 50-500: same top end but considerably more wide angle at the lower end. I've had that 50-500mm and love it. It's tack sharp and great color rendition. With a little practice and VR I've gotten some very good results hand held at 500mm. I use it on a Canon 60D.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.