handgunner wrote:
I got prompted to start this thread from another one I was in this morning.
If you spare the rod will it spoil or "hurt" the child. I am using the quotation marks loosely.
I remember as a young boy my mother reprimanding me with a plastic fly swatter. In it's many uses bringing me around to her point of view the paddle part fell off and all that was left was a hollow tube. I can still hear it whistling throught he air. It did not leave any marks but quickly changed my behaviour rather quickly.
I turned out ok and I hope you all did too.
Any feed back???
I got prompted to start this thread from another o... (
show quote)
I was mostly threatened with being spanked by "your Father when he gets home from work." But it only actually ever happened once or twice that I remember. I think my mother may have spanked my bottom by hand when I was about 3 but I barely remember it.
I have a 3 year old now and although I don't want to spank and try to talk him out of bad behavior that he knows is wrong, sometimes he's so totally rebellious, and doing the exact opposite of what I tell him on purpose, that I kind of yell at him with a stern voice and smack his diaper so it makes a noise but I don't typically hit his skin. I'd rather shock his emotions with a spank action rather than hurt him physically. I don't believe physical pain is justified or deserved for any child.
I attempted to hit his diaper with my palm as usual two weeks ago and missed so that I smacked his leg and it turned red so I knew it stung him and of course he cried pitifully.
I just can't stand causing him to cry by punishing him like that and it's like somebody is sticking a knife into my heart when it happens. I try to balance the diaper smack noise, or in that one case his stinging leg, by telling him the only reason was because he was a very bad boy. Then I pick him up and hold him, talk low to him about how it will be better in a couple minutes, and stroke his back while he cries, which he has now learned to dramatize immensely.
I minored in psychology in college and learned that kids test parents on purpose to see what reactions they can get. Not to be bad but to find a central point where they can learn the difference between good and bad, yes and no, negative and positive, etc. They need to know what's good for them and what's dangerous for them. Kids also develop what one method of psychology calls a "Little Wizard" that derives pleasure from combining previous experiences and reactions to "get" the parent and manipulate the parent into gratifying the child's wishes. For example, little girls learn exactly what "tricks" to use on Daddy with looking up at him and blinking her eyes and being overly cuddly and she gets what she wants. My son looks up at either of us from the floor and cocks his head to one side and changes his eye expression and it always works. These tricks continue into "let me borrow the car, Dad" and then onto their chosen spouses later on. But they all come from their infant and toddler "Little Wizard" that they created to gain control. Little Wizard isn't always nice or good though, sometimes they're mean or rebellious so parents must use some form of discipline to adjust what the child is developing.
A kid can't be allowed to throw the front door open and run straight out into the street to get hit by a vehicle. You can't trust them not to do so because they don't have any experiences to make a common sense decision on. You must instill parameters of what is good and what is bad so they stay in those parameters and unfortunately sometimes it takes "disciplinary" action. I use this example because my son took off down the driveway toward the road and almost got there before we caught him. Our road is mostly an untraveled side street but he doesn't know that. So after catching him, I dragged him kicking and screaming back up the driveway halfway, spanked his diaper twice, and took him with both arms back into the house while talking sternly to him so he knew I was mad about his actions. Apparently it worked because he's never done that again and is pretty well trustworthy to be around the yard although we still watch him carefully.
I was at a home last Sunday where the parents have a 6 year old girl and a 3 year old boy. The mother specifically told me they don't believe in spanking, discipline, or any of that. The only reason she would have told me that was because her 3 year old was running all over doing anything he wanted, almost knocking down my light stands, and running the TV with the sound at 100%. For the pleasure of being able to say they use no discipline, she had to explain why her kid was running nuts everywhere. Their method was to say, "Okay, now that's enough. I'm going to count to 3 and you know what that means. 1... 2..." and never get to 3. Unfortunately, the kid does NOT know what that means because there is no discipline or spanking at 3. So what good is that? If there's nothing to fear, how can the 1-2-3 achieve anything? It didn't. 30 seconds later the kid was doing the same thing again.
So, in a way, I believe in discipline of some sort but prefer it to be an intelligent form of discipline or taking away of some right, instead of beating with a rod, limb, paddle, etc. I'm still learning at this point but it seems that every kid has a different personality that is more or less sensitive than another. A loud yell at one kid might be enough to stop them in their tracks but it may require a smack or two to the diaper with a different kid.
Avoiding all discipline has been proven over and over to ruin the child by studies done after pacifist doctors encouraged it back in the 60's and 70's. It don't work.