nikon wide angle zooms ??? which to pick
Jul 25, 2013 18:57:07 #
Mtn man have you dealt with this dealer seems fishy selling way below any one elses cost
Jul 25, 2013 18:59:47 #
Hankwt wrote:
Mtn man have you dealt with this dealer seems fishy selling way below any one elses cost
It seems fishy for a reason. That seller is a very well known bait-and-switch internet scammer. Please do not consider buying anything from them, you will definitely regret it if you do.
Jul 25, 2013 19:31:31 #
Hankwt wrote:
Mtn man have you dealt with this dealer seems fishy selling way below any one elses cost
No I have not dealt with them and I wasn't suggesting them. My only purpose was to show the lens hood and the claim that you could put a filter on this lens. Some had said it doesn't accept filters. I find that surprising and still don't know.
I got the impression it was a gray market offer, though. That is, no Nikon US warranty.
Jul 25, 2013 19:43:02 #
sbesaw
Loc: Boston
MT Shooter wrote:
It seems fishy for a reason. That seller is a very well known bait-and-switch internet scammer. Please do not consider buying anything from them, you will definitely regret it if you do.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jul 25, 2013 20:03:14 #
As much as i enjoy the internet I long for the days prior to its inception.
Jul 25, 2013 20:22:34 #
Hankwt wrote:
Im looking to add to my aresenal of zoom lenses (... (show quote)
Hi Hankwt
I like the idea of t-shirts, here's my version
Jul 25, 2013 20:29:27 #
Pretty good !! but in all fairness I think if your going to show a brand then show them all !!! i dont see a pocket for the decoder ring though
Jul 25, 2013 22:38:49 #
Hankwt wrote:
Pretty good !! but in all fairness I think if your going to show a brand then show them all !!! i dont see a pocket for the decoder ring though
Yes you are right, the nikon folks will be ganging up on me.
Jul 26, 2013 14:54:28 #
I have the 16-35mm. It is an excellent lens and compares to both of the others optically, w
here you won't notice the difference. It isn't as fast as the other two, but it is way more affordable. I don't have the need for 2.8, as I shoot a lot of scenic and natural history subjects.
Here is an article someone posted about the 14-24 vs 16-35. Having the change lenses is always a slowdown in shooting and allows for dust to get into the camera. This would be a plus for the 16-35.
http://www.mattk.com/2012/07/09/my-new-favorite-wide-angle-lens/
here you won't notice the difference. It isn't as fast as the other two, but it is way more affordable. I don't have the need for 2.8, as I shoot a lot of scenic and natural history subjects.
Here is an article someone posted about the 14-24 vs 16-35. Having the change lenses is always a slowdown in shooting and allows for dust to get into the camera. This would be a plus for the 16-35.
http://www.mattk.com/2012/07/09/my-new-favorite-wide-angle-lens/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.