does anybody else see it
Apr 28, 2013 14:00:30 #
Apr 28, 2013 14:02:10 #
Apr 28, 2013 14:16:54 #
JAW wrote:
I agree, it's different and if you see something else within the picture, your using your imagination to a great extent and I see nothing wrong with that.
I see nothing wrong with it but there is something definitely wrong with you refusing to clarify the statement below. If you see something and it is so amazing, why not say what it is?
JAW wrote:
Yes, I see what you see. Isn't that amazing.
Isn't it what a forum is all about -- to share? So, please share your findings and enlighten us.
Apr 28, 2013 14:24:52 #
Mesa Dave wrote:
There is obviously a Bigfoot making love to a chupacabra. I am surprised that everyone doesn't see it. BS post
This is so funny! Maybe this is what JAW saw and described as "amazing".
Apr 28, 2013 14:30:36 #
I see Queen Victoria wearing a crown or tiara, but then again, I've not been getting nearly enough sleep lately.
Apr 28, 2013 14:53:53 #
topduck1 wrote:
does anybody else see what i see
It looks like most of us cannot see what you see. So far the responses have been:
George Washington's profile?
egg white?
smiling face
profile of batman
Bigfoot making love to a chupacabra
a tree with no leaves, or possibly a dead tree
a very good B&W photo
Queen Victoria wearing a crown or tiara
Except, of course, for JAW. He sees "exactly" what you see. Unfortunately he won't tell. It makes one wonder about his "seeing", doesn't it?
JAW wrote:
Yes, I see what you see. Isn't that amazing.
I myself see leafless tree branches. Dead trees? Maybe! I like how the thicker branches seem to create a natural frame. Good use of lines (the branches run from left to right) and perspective.
BTW, I hope you don't mind me saying this as you didn't ask for C&C. I would skip the white vignette.
Apr 28, 2013 15:10:11 #
Apr 28, 2013 15:20:24 #
Apr 28, 2013 15:52:26 #
JAW wrote:
HumÂ….I see tree limbs.
HumÂ….I see tree limbs.
Ha! That's what I thought. You had no idea what you were talking about. This is a classic example of posting for the sake of just posting. You said you were seeing what topduck1 sees. Here are your own words:
JAW wrote:
Yes, I see what you see. Isn't that amazing.
If this were true then you should be seeing this. But, no, in your own words you see only "tree limbs".
topduck1 wrote:
the profile of an indian in the trees
In short, topduck1 sees "the profile of an indian in the trees"; you see "tree limbs". It doesn't look to me that you see what topduck1 sees.
Apr 28, 2013 16:36:59 #
topduck1 wrote:
the profile of an indian in the trees
I took the liberty of downloading your image. I made a rough outline of the profile. It this what we are supposed to see? Close enough?
Apr 28, 2013 18:32:26 #
Apr 28, 2013 18:42:19 #
Apr 28, 2013 20:31:40 #
JAW
Loc: LA
Seems one of our members has his panties all bunched up in a very tight twist again, he can't get enough said in one post but must continue posting after posting after posting.
Apparently he would like to restrict my rights as a fellow member regarding free speech which includes posting in any thread or not. How about that! If I post, he thinks I post just to post (obviously mistaken) and I should do as he says because he says so. He demands I reply. Free speech can be interpreted as no response as I have done and believe none is needed regarding his posts.
Someone, please point this num nut toward the ladies room for a quick check up? If he is in doubt which room, it's the one with no urinals (he'll have to check that out for himself personally - he seems well qualified).
He's beginning to sound like a bitchy old man that just can't help himself - he has to have the last or seemingly the last word posted. You watch, he will be back with more posting - he can't help himself - like an addiction.
Apparently he would like to restrict my rights as a fellow member regarding free speech which includes posting in any thread or not. How about that! If I post, he thinks I post just to post (obviously mistaken) and I should do as he says because he says so. He demands I reply. Free speech can be interpreted as no response as I have done and believe none is needed regarding his posts.
Someone, please point this num nut toward the ladies room for a quick check up? If he is in doubt which room, it's the one with no urinals (he'll have to check that out for himself personally - he seems well qualified).
He's beginning to sound like a bitchy old man that just can't help himself - he has to have the last or seemingly the last word posted. You watch, he will be back with more posting - he can't help himself - like an addiction.
Apr 28, 2013 21:12:54 #
JAW wrote:
Someone, please point this num nut toward the ladies room for a quick check up?
You watch, he will be back with more posting - he can't help himself - like an addiction.
You watch, he will be back with more posting - he can't help himself - like an addiction.
JAW,
It is better to be pointed towards the ladies' room than to the Copyright Law for copyright infringement.
It is better to be addicted to posting replies than to posting someone else's photos as if they were mine.
Do you get the picture? I bet you do.
Apr 29, 2013 06:14:30 #
topduck1 wrote:
does anybody else see what i see
The worst photo of a cat I've ever seen! Rob.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.