JudyTee23 wrote:
Mogul- I am sorry for this delayed response, but I work long days, Art classes, 9AM-4PM, Mon. through Fri., Photography class, 7-10 PM, Mon. through Fri. I usually spend an additional hour or more with individual students to help them with any difficulties. So, I do not get back to quarters until well after 11PM.
Recognizing that this is a Photography Forum and not an Education Forum, I will try to be brief.
The overall tenor of the OP's post indicates to me, at least, that he does not enjoy a good relationship with his instructor. In the recent past, he has asked several questions which could have readily been answered by any decent instructor.
Like you, I tend to doubt that a full-fledged, tenured, "professor" would be teaching a photography class. It matters not who teaches a class, but the quality of the instruction is paramount.
Three years ago, when my college was trying to develop a worthwhile class in photographic basics, I sat in on classes at other institutions. I was often appalled at the poor quality of instruction being offered. Clearly, it was difficult to find instructors who knew the subject matter and also had the necessary communication skills to impart their knowledge to others. That may be part of the problem our OP is encountering.
I have no problem with the OP studying how to use film, as long as the subject matter was preceded by a good grounding in basic optics and other fundamentals of photography. Too many courses do not provide a sufficient foundation. Also, too many courses tend to emphasize "digital" rather than "photography."
My short, seven-year career at a small, conservative, basically liberal arts college, does not qualify me to engage in a detailed dissertation regarding the status of many of our educational institutions. I understand most of your concerns and share some of your observations. I would be happy to engage you in such a discussion via PM if you so desire, taking into account my heavy work schedule.
I am barred by college policy from mentioning the name of the institution on the Web, so please do not ask.
Have a nice day.
Mogul- I am sorry for this delayed response, but I... (
show quote)
What an odd restriction on academic freedom -- not being able to mention the institution you work for on the web.
A tenured professor may very well teach photography. While the art of photography has often been disparaged by those who interpret the instrument as the "creator" of a facsimile, and without regard to the role of the photographer in composing, and then realising an authentic and unique expression; it has through many growing pains become accepted as a legitimate and powerful medium for the expression of the creative impulse--revealing the inspiration of a gifted artist. The media is the means of expression, not the content, (and certainly not the whole content), of expression.
And so, there are professors who teach photography, and a number of them break the boundaries of the known, pushing deeper into the subject than others had previously.
Like at any institution of higher learning there will be a range of knowledge and a range of abilities when it comes to teaching. Some professors are greater researchers, but not so great on teaching undergrads, while others are phenomenal teachers, but do not write the defining papers in their disciplines. Occasionally both exist in one person, and then the ability to inspire students to go beyond their current selves is fed with cutting edge state of the art knowledge. So where does one find these great professors? Like everything else in our competitive world, the best are drawn to the institutions which offer them the most resources to expand and explore. Hence, it is not at the regional college level where such people are likely to be found.