Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jsmith218
Mar 8, 2019 12:52:58   #
amfoto1 wrote:
That would be a good idea. You need to know how the images will be used in more detail... the size they will be displayed, the background, how large the products are, etc.

I did a similar job for a friend's website some years ago... it involved about 200 items, all small enough to be photographed on a tabletop (but not so small as to require "macro"). I set up lighting, determined my exposure and locked it down, set a custom white balance and arranged a seamless stage, then put camera and lens on a tripod. I made a couple reflectors and flags that I could move around as needed to fine tune the lighting.

Once the setup was established, things went quickly. She only asked for one shot of each, but for most I took several views to give her choices. I deliberately used a shorter lens (manual focus 45mm Tilt Shift on an APS-C camera) that allowed me to reach out and arrange the subjects while viewing them through the viewfinder. I could have tethered the camera to a computer to do similar, but kept telling myself to "K.I.S.S."

I was able to shoot the entire catalog in little more than an afternoon. I probably took 600 to 800 images total, but I ended up providing around 300 (I culled out dupes, less ideal compositions, issues like reflections). In some cases, smaller, related objects were combined into a single images. Since color balance and exposure were all carefully set in advance and I used the seamless (matte white plastic) stage and background, there was virtually no post-processing needed. It was mostly just a matter of selecting the images to include, all of which I was able to do in 2 or 3 hours that evening.

I had shot RAW + JPEGs, just in case... But was able to give her the JPEGs straight out of the camera. I made a point of saving to sRGB (instead of Adobe RGB), which is the preferred color space for Internet display. The whole job was done with an older, 8MP camera. But that was more than adequate for her purposes. In the end she got at least two or three views of every item, all burned to a disc which she passed along to her website designer who was able to easily blend image backgrounds with the web pages and had everything up online in a couple days with little fuss or muss.

90% of the job was the setup... When that's done right, the rest can be done relatively quickly and easily. Larger items that can't be shot close-up on a tabletop will take longer to swap out and arrange, so take that into account.
That would be a good idea. You need to know how th... (show quote)


Thanks for sharing your experience, that helps!
Go to
Mar 8, 2019 11:28:24   #
Bill P wrote:
This is the kind of work that demands organization. It should be some sort of assembly line process. These kind of shoots are a great example of why commercial guys have one of more assistants. You might, if the three shot thing is well thought out, you could set up three cameras, one for each shot, and be more efficient. This kind of work is more about planning and organization that art.


The organization certainly is one of my concerns, I will need to keep track of the different product photos and organize them together. It sounds like many of them may look similar so that might be a struggle
Go to
Mar 8, 2019 09:01:47   #
Thanks for all the input, I definitely plan on finding out expectations!
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 18:57:38   #
I like the first of the first and the last of the last...make sense?
Go to
Mar 7, 2019 18:34:41   #
I might have the opportunity to photograph a large number of items (250-270) for a manufacturer to put on their website store. I wouldn't even know how to charge for something like this. I think it largely depends on what they expect as far as editing out the background out or whatever their expectations are. I have read some things that say start at $25 per image. Oh, did I mention they need 3 photos at different angles of each item? I was hoping to get some input here on this. Thanks.
Go to
Aug 13, 2017 13:43:54   #
I agree, picture control.
Go to
Jul 24, 2017 09:07:22   #
There is a wildlife safari on the interstate about 20 minutes east if you like wildlife photos
Go to
Mar 4, 2017 08:48:11   #
Check reputable sites for reburbs, they both have built in flash btw
Go to
Feb 19, 2017 09:04:49   #
If your shutter keeps changing, you might have bracketing on
Go to
Jan 16, 2017 22:33:37   #
Ronjonron wrote:
Wait...is this a total eclipse, with corona, across mid America, or an annular eclipse with a ring of unobstructed sunlight at the periphery?


Annular
Go to
Jan 16, 2017 13:31:24   #
tyedyetommy wrote:
Go to a welding supply store, buy a 4"x 4" number 10 glass [not plastic] welding lens. The higher the number the darker the lens ,so a 11 is darker than a 10. There is a dark green and a gold plated lens, buy both, they do not cost a lot. Hold, tape, the plate over your lens and take some practice shots. I have taken sun shots doing exactly what I have written, the shots came out great. As a retired welder, I have watched more than one eclipse behind a welding hood.


Thanks for the tip, I have an 11, I've heard if you use a welding shield it should be at least 14, is this not true?
Go to
Jan 16, 2017 11:16:09   #


thanks
Go to
Jan 16, 2017 08:57:20   #
It's an annular eclipse not a lunar. Part of the sun will be exposed since it's not a total eclipse.
Go to
Jan 15, 2017 18:37:22   #
This August I will be in the shadow of the annular eclipse. I have read that with a total eclipse you don't need a solar filter during the totality of the eclipse, is this true also with an annular eclipse? Is a ND filter sufficiant? The sheets of solar filter paper seem cheaper than a screw on, is there a way to make that work? Thanks.
Go to
Jan 2, 2017 18:24:18   #
Love my D90, I upgraded to D7100. My biggest advantage over the D90 is low light capabilities. Other than that, sometimes I think my D90 pictures are better. If you are happy with the high ISO quality, go for new glass.
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.