Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: tkhphotography
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 41 next>>
Aug 2, 2012 15:19:06   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's worth of returns. This whole hullabaloo is simply to find fodder to demonize him with & to deflect attention off of Obama

ole sarg wrote:
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. His own party wants him to show his returns.

He gives the impression that he is hiding something.

Until they are released there will be no national debate the entire news media will focus on only this question.

He will make a statement and the first question from any reporter will be why won't you release your tax returns.

We the people deserve better than this.

The question remains:

Mitt what are you hiding?
JV it is worth a reply. These are good questions. ... (show quote)
Legally, he's only required to release 2 year's wo... (show quote)


It's just funny sometimes to think that his father more or less started the practice of releasing many years of tax returns to the public for scrutiny and yet, his son, for some reason, won't come clean. Either he and his people want the American public to keep dwelling on the issue of his non-complying as his father did and he is hiding something, OR, it takes the presidential early debates on real issues off the table.

Maybe tonight on the national tv interview(s) he will put a stop to all this nonsense and we can get back to a real discussion of which of these monkeys is really qualified to win the election.
Go to
Jul 12, 2012 15:15:02   #
tschmath wrote:
?"


As of this morning, the House has voted on some part of "Obama-care" some way some how for 33 times and yet a floor debate of the 'disclosure' act of campaign financing sits in committee because Mr. "Boner" refuses to let it be seen. Amazing!
Go to
Jul 10, 2012 20:54:03   #
Roger Hicks wrote:
Unlike almost every other country in the world, the US requires (and has always required, as far as I know) ALL its citizens (and indeed green card holders) to file tax returns every year; and they tax or attempt to tax unearned income (including very small pensions) over about $10,000 a year. The earned income allowance is something like $90,000 a year. I don't remember exactly, because my wife, who is a US citizen, don't earn more than a tiny fraction of that. But each year, she dutifully file taxes. The only way to get out of it is to give up US citizenship; or, in my case, to return my green card, which I did as soon as I found out about this ridiculous requirement.

I paid every cent of tax that was due when I lived in the US, as I have in the other countries in which I have lived, but you need to be a lunatic to pay tax in a country where you don't live, and of which you are not a citizen. Here's a simple message to those who wish to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, which applies in every country in the world, regardless of where you choose to make your home: GO AWAY. WE DON'T NEED PEOPLE LIKE YOU.

Cheers,

R.
Unlike almost every other country in the world, th... (show quote)


If you meant "ALL" its citizens to file tax returns every year to mean all people who received "income" (as defined by multiple IRS regulations) then you may be half-right. If you "earn income" as defined by multiple IRS regulations in the US and you have had 'taxes' deducted during the year and at the years ending, the IRS "owes" you a refund, you are required to file a return only to get your refund, not as a legal citizen's duty/requirement of being said citizen of the US.
Go to
Jul 10, 2012 20:34:01   #
I wonder why people as donrent (who aint a 'bad' photographer) always post long posts full of 'facts' but never list their sources.....

Can't they just say that they got it off an email that was sent to them from a right wing spammer...Usually (as noted) when you see the words "pass it on", that's a good clue.

And he does seem to be silent since his first posting.
Go to
Jul 10, 2012 15:07:56   #
colo43 wrote:
Never the less, of whom ever penned the article, its brought out some very good points for thought!


surely you don't mean you can't vote if you are on government assistance, ....or do you?
Go to
Jul 10, 2012 15:06:22   #
[quote=MWAC]
colo43.[/quote wrote:


Reading around the internet, it was apparently written by a man named Alfred W. Evans as a letter to the editor of the Waco Tribune not a young 21 year old woman. I would like to know why he thinks it neccessary for a woman to get a tubal legation in order to receive government assistance but males do not seem to require a vasectomy for the same assistance??

https://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/tag/waco-tribune-herald


Sounds more like 'Alfred E. Neuman' (Mad Magazine) than someone named Alfred W. Evans to me.

As for your enquiry re females v males.......99% of all laws are written by men..

I've long been of the belief that the question of birth should only be settled by women eligible to vote, not old tired white men dictating tot he general population what is moral and what is not. Had it been men who carry children to full term birth I think we would be in a different pickle.
Go to
Jul 6, 2012 15:09:09   #
ken4peace wrote:
rocar7 wrote:
pepperosa wrote:
The end is near!


You've lost me I'm afraid. What is the significance of that date? What's happening? Is this an American thing? What am I missing?


An ancient Mayan calendar has been discovered that predicted that the end of the world would be on this date. I don't know about you but I am so tired about hearing people predict the end of the world based on something or another. Isn't it time we learned to live fully in the hear and now and stopped worrying about the future.
quote=rocar7 quote=pepperosa The end is near! /q... (show quote)
\

actually they didn't predict the end of the world, just the end of their calendar cycle.
Go to
Jul 6, 2012 15:05:44   #
Audwulf wrote:
If it's such a great program, why does it not apply to Congressmen, Senators, and the President ? Seems like what is good for the goose, should be good for the gander. If Social Security is so good, why do the above mentioned exempt themselves from it ? Some thing to ponder.


something that I've wondered for many years and have yet still to get a definitive answer from my Senators or Congressmen.


"we're working on it.".....ya, rite!
Go to
Jul 6, 2012 15:00:05   #
Archy wrote:
America's headline unemployment rate has been flattered by the number of people no longer counted in the denominator used to calculate it, resulting in a skewed picture that hides how serious the level of unemployment actually is, The Wall Street Journal reports...http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/wsj-government-miscounting-unemployed/2012/07/06/id/444599



old news...
they haven't been counting the people looking for full time and accepting part time jobs nor those people who have dropped off the lists by not looking for and seeking unemployment compensation for a looooong time.
old news....
Go to
Jun 29, 2012 15:43:37   #
Archy wrote:
MWAC wrote:
Don't forget the policitians that are screaming about how bad "socialized" healthcare in the US would be, receive FREE healthcare for life because they were elected to office. yep those very people that are saying socialzed healthcare is bad, are on socialized healthcare and would fight tooth over nail to keep it.


Do you have any proof to back up your statement…………….



sounds as if you need to stand o/s a VA hospital and ask a vet or two what medical program they just received.
Go to
Jun 28, 2012 16:25:32   #
Sirsnapalot wrote:
Supreme Court upholds Obamacare! More tax on the working class and more free rides for the leeches!!


If we could stop the back biting here on the hog a bit and just consider a few lines from the actual decision. I really love the part where the Court noted how so-called "Obama-care" resembles a successful program from a state's program that is now referred to as "Romney-care."

Must make the righties wet their pants.
Go to
Jun 28, 2012 14:45:58   #
MisterWilson wrote:
A letter from Jim DeMint, one of our representatives from South Carolina

Dear Friend,

The Supreme Court may have failed to stop this government takeover of health care, but the American people will not. Since the day this law was rammed through Congress, the American people have demanded repeal, and today’s ruling doesn’t make Obamacare any less dangerous to our nation’s health. Freedom-loving Americans are disappointed, but we cannot be discouraged.

The President's health care law must be fully repealed as all of its promises have proven false. We were told it was not a tax hike, but this ruling confirms it is an unprecedented and enormous tax on the poor and middle class Americans. President Obama needs to explain why he is enacting this middle class tax hike over the objections of the American people during the worst economic recovery since the Great Depression.

We were told it would lower health costs, but health care premiums are exploding. We were told that Americans could keep their personal health plans, but millions will now lose it. We were told it would improve our economy, but it is now the largest obstacle to employers hiring new workers.

This government takeover of health care remains as destructive, unsustainable, and unconstitutional as it was the day it was passed, unread, by a since-fired congressional majority. Now as then, our first step toward real health care reform and economic renewal remains Obamacare's full repeal, down to the last letter and punctuation mark.

I urge every governor to stop implementing the health care exchanges that would help implement the harmful effects of this misguided law. Americans have loudly rejected this federal takeover of health care, and governors should join with the people and reject its implementation.

The Presidents health care law will not reform anything, but is already undermining what does still work in America’s health care system. We cannot build a free market health care system on this flawed structure of centralized government control, we must repeal all of it and start over with commonsense solutions that make health care more affordable and accessible for every American. We can allow Americans to purchase lower cost plans from other states, support state high-risk pools to cover those with pre-existing conditions, medical-malpractice reform to end frivolous lawsuits, and tax equity so Americans who don’t get their health insurance from an employer are not penalized.

Today's decision, however unfortunate, nonetheless represents an opportunity to all Americans, to claim their right to create a health care system of, for, and by the people, not government or special interests. The American people now have the chance and Congress has the responsibility to fully repeal this Washington takeover and reform health care ourselves, together, around the principles of individual liberty, not government mandates.

The same freedom that made America strong and prosperous will make us healthier, too, so long as politicians remember that the health care system is supposed to serve our people, and not the other way around.

Sincerely,

Jim DeMint (R-SC)
A letter from Jim DeMint, one of our representativ... (show quote)


Perhaps you could ask Mr. DeMint at his next town hall meeting to drop his 'mandated' gubermint health plan he enjoys??
Go to
Jun 28, 2012 14:33:49   #
PNagy wrote:
It is probably true that Democrats cheat, as they did in Cook County, Illinois, 1960. However, the ones who get away with cheating are those who are in control. They make the rules and have most of the key posts manned by their own people. Currently, the Republicans have most state and local offices.

It is not easy for Democrats to cheat in too manny places. In fact, the Republicans are notorious for sending their goons to primary Democratic precincts to intimidate everyone they can into not voting. They also challenge people's right to vote, often without the slightest pretext, other than profiling. So where have the Democrats cheated lately on a massive scale, such as the Republicans did in Florida 2000, and Ohio, 2004?

One other point; it is true that strict laws on voter identification eliminate a few illegal votes, but that is not their purpose. Republican internal memos have repeatedly leaked, revealing an overt campaign to suppress the voter turnout. The truth is that despite the plutocrats and twisted-thinking average wage earners who vote for them, the Republicans still have the support only of a minority of Americans. If they can keep most of the voters at home they win. Democratic voters are not as diligent about their right/duty to vote, and can more easily be kept away from the polls. For every attempted Democratic voter fraud that Republican rules stop, they stop dozens of legitimate voters, and that is their real, often admitted purpose.
It is probably true that Democrats cheat, as they ... (show quote)


I guess from reading most of the right wing replies and thinking on this, we can assume that during the recent re-call election in Wisconsin that it must have been Democrats calling registered voters and telling them if they had signed the re-call petition there was no need to go and vote the next day, as they had already "voted" by their signature on the re-call initiative..
Go to
Jun 28, 2012 14:29:05   #
BigBear wrote:
I'm independent and don't like any part of it. Mostly because the government is involved as they have to business being there and forcing me to be part of it.
And as far as Obama goes, that's another agenda to rid us of him.


We can now assume that you are not a vet taking part of Veteran's health insurance through the VA. If you are not, I wonder how your thinking would shape up different had you'd been one,if at all? And if you are a vet, can we conclude that you have never used the VA for its medical facilities, knowing "they have to (sic) business being there and forcing me to be a part of it."?
Go to
Jun 24, 2012 15:39:33   #
Mac wrote:
Al FR-153 wrote:
Mac wrote:


Roberto Clemente had a bad year in 1968. After winning his fourth Batting Title, hitting .357 in 1967, he slumped to .291 in 1968. He rebounded hitting .345, .352 and .341 the next three years.


Oh, how I remember that.... And you can bet that it bothered him, deeply. Long live the memories of Rebba; one fantastic ball player. To me, the greatest player the Pirates ever had.



Me too!!!


me three.

always remembered the way he had that little 'twitch' in the box before he settled down to hit. And he had one of the greatest arms in baseball, back when you threw home with a man on second and a ball hit to the outfield...hardly anymore!
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 41 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.