Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: GrahamS
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 52 next>>
Apr 9, 2013 11:44:43   #
All that you refer to will appear in the 4th part of my series of beginners guides on PASM, but it will be a while before I am able to post the rermaining two, P and M. You will have to be patient, sorry.
Go to
Apr 8, 2013 05:48:38   #
Chashub wrote:
hi all,
i hope i'm wording this properly.
what effects would be gained by using aperture priority? shutter priority?
thanks,
charlie


Here 'ya go, Charlie, and you don't have to leave the Hog.

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-103350-1.html
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-102223-1.html
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 09:20:47   #
Where do these rumours come from? The Canon EF 24-105 L IS USM is not, as Jpintn said, a "kit" lens. It is a high quality professional spec lens and one of the best lenses Canon make. It has no more vignetting than any other lens in it's class, and this would only be noticeable when used wide open, and on the RAW files, as the later Canon bodies automatically correct this in the Jpg files. It needs to be paired with a 7D or 5D Mk2 or Mk3 or 6D body to realise the best that it is capable of delivering.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 09:05:46   #
I use a Pakard-Bell netbook.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 09:04:28   #
bmazz wrote:
Below are three photos of the same genre (Stealth, Piercing eyes and Eye of the Tiger) two are mine, one I snatched off the internet.



Why are you asking us to critique a photo that you have pulled off the web and why pull an image off the web in the first place?
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 08:24:34   #
Never EVER respond in any way! Doing so only confirms that your contact details are valid.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:54:40   #
johnske wrote:

These two shots were shot 2 minutes apart through a screen door about ten feet in front of the lens, and are of a faded sign across the road - both were treated exactly the same in post.



You can tell by the sunlight and shadow on the pole in the second shot that the lighting changed.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:48:52   #
Wow!
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:40:42   #
James F. wrote:
My current camera body is a Eos Rebel T3 and I wanted to invest some hard earned money for the "The " Canon lens. I looked on a website "http://lenshero.com" to see if the lens was able to function correctly on my camera since it is a crop frame sensor & the lens is built for full frame sensors. The website said that it was compatible with the Rebel T3 but I don't know if the website is reliable. I have had some photographers tell me that I would get like a black shadow around the edge of my photographs because it was a crop frame sensor. I don't want to have to upgrade my camera body just to use the lens. Please help. Thanks.
My current camera body is a Eos Rebel T3 and I wan... (show quote)


The EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM will work just fine on your T3.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:36:52   #
lockdown wrote:
D80 Nikon. Take a lot of landscape pic. Need a wide angle lens of my dreams. You guys are the best for recommending stuff. Any suggestions?


Nikon 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR DX AF-S Nikkor will do all you need to do.

http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1177/cat/13
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:17:15   #
My suggestion: A Nikon D3100 with the 18-55 kit lens and the 55-200.

See here: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/recommended-cameras.htm
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:11:13   #
Tea8 wrote:
All I know about Canon is that you can't use old lenses on the newer bodies because their newer lenses and bodies use a different mounting format. So you'd have to have an adaptor too unit old lenses if its even possible, idk I'm a Nikon girl.


She's talking about heritage film camera lenses for FD or FL mount, not old Eos film camera lenses. An Eos EF mount lens will fit any Canon Eos digital camera, no matter how old.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 06:02:40   #
Joelbarton87 wrote:
im just not seeing the results.


You won't see the difference by looking at images posted on the web. You need to look at and compare original (full size) image files.
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 05:59:18   #
Here's another:

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=fup2
Go to
Apr 7, 2013 05:50:01   #
Brian in Whitby wrote:
I really cannot see the need to update firmware on a camera unless there is a bug in the current firmware. It is like updating drivers on a computer. You may have the most up to date driver but is it any better? Probably not.
Updating software that works fine seems to me to be a waste of time. The exception would be if the new software on your computer fixes a bug, increases functionality or improves security.
On a camera, security is not an issue. New software will not make the sensor more sensitive or the image sharper. If there is a bug, it should have been discovered and fixed long before you bought your camera. If you don't see the results of a bug in your use of the camera, it isn't important anyway.
I really cannot see the need to update firmware on... (show quote)


There are more reasons to update firmware than to fix bugs. Manufacturers include improved features, better performance, additional features in updates. The last firmware update for the Canon 7D made the camera a whole new model upgrade.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 52 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.