Posts for: WJShaheen
Apr 29, 2019 08:51:14 #
I use this https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1334357-REG/elvid_ocm_7b_4kv2_7_4k_on_camera.html on my Nikon D7500 and it's very effective.
But, since you have an HDMI port, it should work.
But, since you have an HDMI port, it should work.
Apr 7, 2019 20:17:16 #
tonyjag wrote:
When i got to the part where you simultaneously press the AF and movie record buttons, nothing would happen, even after i held the buttons for many seconds. Then I turned the dial from Auto (no flash) to M and it worked. It may have been a coincidence.
I just now ran it in AF-S mode and it worked. Focusing needs to be in manual mode, of course.
Apr 7, 2019 19:24:30 #
CO wrote:
I didn't know the D7500 has it. It seems to work well.
I just ran through the procedure. Using the 18-140mm, I ended up at +10.
Apr 7, 2019 16:13:00 #
CO wrote:
The D5, D500, and D850 have the auto fine tuning feature. I've used it on my D500. In the procedure, you take a shot with the camera in live view mode. That subsequently gets locked in as a new AF adjustment. It enters a value in the AF fine tuning bank automatically. After I did the auto fine tuning procedure, I checked with my DataColor SpyderLensCal. It seemed to be very accurate.
So does the D7500. Just not sure it's the same as it is in these august bodies.
Apr 1, 2019 09:52:02 #
TriX wrote:
Not inexpensive, but a Camranger is the answer if it supports your camera. Fast, good range and allows complete camera control.
Feb 26, 2019 06:38:37 #
Rick36203 wrote:
It's 20GB of free storage if you own and register a Nikon camera. I've had it for some time now. I've used it to share full size image files with family and friends via password protected links. I also have a public link (folder with selected smaller images) here.
http://img.gg/8TO4NKR
I have never used another service, such as flickr, so I can't evaluate by comparison.
http://img.gg/8TO4NKR
I have never used another service, such as flickr, so I can't evaluate by comparison.
Rick - I've never given much thought to using Nikon Image Space until now.
I just now registered and am uploading an album.
Thank you.
Feb 6, 2019 16:22:20 #
PHRubin wrote:
I have Canon DSLRs. From the oldest using DPP3 to the newest using DPP4 I can batch process RAW to JPG. DPP comes with the camera. If you have Canon, you can go to the Canon website and download. You will need a camera S/N.
đź‘Ť
Feb 6, 2019 07:01:48 #
The manufacturers provide free software to process (to some extent) their respective raw files.
If Nikon, ViewNX-i, with which I routinely do batch conversions.
For Canon, DPP4 (Digital Photo Professional 4), or whatever the latest version is.
If Nikon, ViewNX-i, with which I routinely do batch conversions.
For Canon, DPP4 (Digital Photo Professional 4), or whatever the latest version is.
Jan 27, 2019 09:12:47 #
[quote=david vt]Nope. You’re not quite getting it. It is NOT the lens, the crop factor is in that you are using an APC camera body - your D7500. With a crop BODY, you are getting a FOV equivalent of 1.5x of a old 35mm film camera. It does not matter, in terms of the crop factor, if you are using a DX or FX lens - the CF is determined by the body, and it happens that a FF BODY matches the old 35mm film size (and why it is known as FF).
So, your next question is that if does not make a difference in Field of View between a FF and DX lens, why are there both? It has to do with the maximum size of the image circle that can hit the sensor. The FF lens has a larger image circle hitting the sensor than a DX lens. So, if you use a FF lens on a DX body, no problem. The larger image circle is just outside the sensor. No harm, no foul. However, if you use a DX lens on an FX body, the image circle can be too small, resulting in vignetting at the corners of the sensor.
Hope that helps. You can google DX lens on an FX body for more info, or search past threads here in UHH archives. Some of our folks have posted nice images and diagrams explaining.
Bottom line, on your APX D7500 crop body, the 1.5x CF is applied to ALL lens, and this is why you did not see a difference in your test in terms of FOV and “equivalent” length.
So, your next question is that if does not make a difference in Field of View between a FF and DX lens, why are there both? It has to do with the maximum size of the image circle that can hit the sensor. The FF lens has a larger image circle hitting the sensor than a DX lens. So, if you use a FF lens on a DX body, no problem. The larger image circle is just outside the sensor. No harm, no foul. However, if you use a DX lens on an FX body, the image circle can be too small, resulting in vignetting at the corners of the sensor.
Hope that helps. You can google DX lens on an FX body for more info, or search past threads here in UHH archives. Some of our folks have posted nice images and diagrams explaining.
Bottom line, on your APX D7500 crop body, the 1.5x CF is applied to ALL lens, and this is why you did not see a difference in your test in terms of FOV and “equivalent” length.
Jan 27, 2019 06:52:11 #
mas24 wrote:
The Tamron 18-400mm is a crop sensor designed lens that is selling fast at about $649 now. A bargain IMO. That lens will give you a field of view of 600mm, as previously stated. Why would you want more? Unless you buy an aftermarket teleconverter, you will find that the Brand Name teleconverters are not inexpensive. If you had a Nikon lens with a Nikon camera, certain Nikon lenses would work with a Kenko Brand name 1.4X teleconverter. Don't even consider a 2.0X. Good luck.
Agree wholeheartedly on using the Kenko 1.4x. Good image quality and the extended FL and f/r are properly recorded.
Jan 27, 2019 06:46:58 #
I add text using Microsoft Paint 3D. I don't use the 3D feature and so could probably get by with Paint.
For example: https://williamshaheen.smugmug.com/Landscape/i-LzXcLTb
For example: https://williamshaheen.smugmug.com/Landscape/i-LzXcLTb
Jan 25, 2019 07:30:33 #
Ahh, yes.
Longshadow wrote:
Nope, Scottish.
Jan 25, 2019 05:28:22 #
Or Dutch?
Bigmike1 wrote:
Personally I don't have the money to waste on the best type of printer for photographs. I am content to use the ones at the local Walgreens. They work just fine and I don't have to worry about replacing ink cartridges all the time. Maybe I am just lazy but also cheap. Maybe I have some Jewish ancestry somewhere. (:
Jan 24, 2019 10:34:31 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Yes - usa.canon.com
Find 'support' for the EOS 80D and download the current version of DPPv4. You'll be prompted for the camera serial number to unlock the download.
Find 'support' for the EOS 80D and download the current version of DPPv4. You'll be prompted for the camera serial number to unlock the download.
Jan 23, 2019 07:45:00 #
DWU2 wrote:
I've seen a lot of photos posted about the super blood wolf moon - some of them very good! Question: If you took a regular full moon photo and adjusted the white balance or applied a red-orange tint in post, could anyone tell the difference?
Yes. During a Lunar eclipse, the reddish cast is not uniform across the Moon's surface. It will darker/lighter towards one side.
It might be uniform if the alignment was 100%. I.e., the Earth's shadow fell on the center of the Moon.
But, the shadow is larger than the Moon (especially when the Moon is closer to the Earth).