Posts for: Nalu
Feb 9, 2024 08:27:00 #
OldCADuser wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by "you loose a lo... (show quote)
Sorry my mistake. I made the wrong assumption that "clear image zoom" was the same as "crop" mode. With I little research I now appreciate the difference. You are correct, "clear image zoom" does not impact the file size. I believe however that the feature is not available when shooting raw, which I use exclusively. But you have tweeked my interest. Maybe I should shoot a few JPEG images just to try it out, assuming my cameras, A1 and A7Riv have the feature. Thanks for the education.
Feb 8, 2024 20:16:22 #
OldCADuser wrote:
In my humble opinion, physical tele-extenders are ... (show quote)
Yes, that is an option, however you loose a lot of pixels when you use an option like "clear image zoom". That may be fine when you simply are viewing your images on a computer, but I imagine you might loose the benefit the large sensors available today provide when printing. Yes, adding a converter to a lens and camera may be a pain in the "you know what" but I will maintain that the converters of today, and I am referring to Sony, show very little image degradation.
Feb 8, 2024 09:03:20 #
Maybe I am not a picky as some, but with my newer Sony teleconverters, I find no image degradation. And I have seen hundreds of extremely sharp images made with the same equipment. I can't say the same with older Canon converters. The Canon 1.4x was ok, but their 2x was problematic.
Feb 7, 2024 09:34:53 #
Feb 5, 2024 09:30:28 #
I do wish Sony would consider a light 400 f/4 e mount G Master. I think it would a winner.
Feb 5, 2024 09:24:14 #
Feb 4, 2024 09:27:53 #
JD750 wrote:
“A 19-year-old boy reportedly died Saturday after ... (show quote)
I was there last month and posted a photo of the view. Here it is again. As a kid, I had no fear of getting close to edges like the ones here. Now, in my mid 70's, by brain creates enough fear of falling that I can't do it any longer. Note the foreground in this shot. This was taken with a 17mm focal length, so you can imagine how far back from the edge I was. I was tempted to get closer, but could not get myself to do it.
Feb 3, 2024 08:50:44 #
Sony jump started improved AF with the A9. It was a game changer for anyone shooting action. They switched to Sony and never looked back. With the releases of high end glass and the investments in such and continued improvement in the bodies, anyone who made the switch has not incentives to go with the competition. On the other hand, Nikon coming out with zooms with built in converters may have something going for them, but my guess is Sony with provide the same options.
Feb 2, 2024 10:29:02 #
Photolady2014 wrote:
Thanks so much! Sometimes I really want the 400 and other times my 600, like for my upcoming Yellowstone trip. Budget said I had to choose one….😕
Having both is indeed a reach, but in my case, Sony came out with the 400 2.8 first and there was no forecast that they were going to produce a 600 f/4. I've considered selling it on more than one occasion, but just can't get myself to do it. Don't get me wrong, the 600 would go a long way for images. But, there is quite a bit of walking, at least on the islands we visited, so keep that in mind as you decide what glass you are going to take on your trip.
I watched this YouTube clip of an interview with a photographer sharing some of his experiences on a 2 week visit to the Falklands. You might find it interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhEprPfnry0
Feb 2, 2024 09:58:33 #
Feb 2, 2024 09:51:31 #
This first time I heard a Bald Eagle talk I was really surprised. Considering the majesty of the bird, I thought it would have a majestic call. They are just kind of squeaky to me, but still majestic. Nice shot.
Feb 2, 2024 09:48:30 #
I don't remember the museum have a Crested Caracara but I haven't been there for quite some time. Is the bird a new addition. May be a reason to pay a visit.
Feb 2, 2024 09:44:30 #
I tend to lean toward images where your subject is communicating with the viewer. # 1 does that. But it's also nice to convey a behavioral trate, like curiosity, which # 4 seems to show. Those would be my choices.
Feb 2, 2024 09:38:14 #
I was one of those who always told myself to keep the ISO low if you wanted good image quality. I think I lost a lot of shots of moving subjects because of that way of thinking. Things have change and these days that fear is disappearing and you just provided confirmation. Thanks for that. Great shots btw.
Feb 1, 2024 15:13:57 #
Photolady2014 wrote:
Great photos again. Nice knowing what you took. I have a 600 f4 but not a 400 2.8. Then a 100-500. Sounds like the 100-500 would work. How much did you use the 400?
I used the 400 quite a bit, without converters for the most part in that I did not need the additional length. It was very handy with overcast sky and for portraits. But then, the 200-600 was the go to lens when I didn't want to haul around my backpack. You should be fine with a 100-500 and some sort of landscape lens, like a 24-105. Just don't think the 600 prime is worth hauling down there. Whoever you choose as a guide should also be able to provide advice. Good luck!