Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: bkellyusa
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 25 next>>
Dec 8, 2016 09:36:19   #


Well I love Lowepro products but I don't think I understand this vest. All I see are loops. Are there no pockets?

It also says it should be used with their belt system. I don't get that either but I can enthusiastically recommend their utility belts. They make two. I use the lighter one.
Go to
Nov 30, 2016 09:08:41   #
repleo wrote:
I use an A6000 and shoot landscapes mostly. I usually use A mode. Unless I am trying to create a shallow DoF, I set Aperture around the middle of the lenses range , limit ISO to 100 - 200 and let the camera set S. If S is acceptable, I'll tweak the Exp Comp +/- to push the histogram to the right or to minimize any zebra bars.
If S is too slow, I'll use my tripod or open up Aperture a couple of stops before I'll surrender ISO. If the scene is particularly promising or difficult , I'll take a shot in Auto or Scene as fall back.
I use an A6000 and shoot landscapes mostly. I usu... (show quote)


I wish I had also said that I use the Scene modes as a fall back to Manual. Especially on sunsets scenes. The Scene mode is often better and often doesn't require any additional PP.
Go to
Nov 30, 2016 08:49:56   #
Linda From Maine wrote:
The "you must use manual mode" advice is similar to you must shoot in raw (or conversely, never ever edit; it's cheating!), you must use a full-frame camera...on and on.

Whatever mode works for you and your situation at the moment is the right one. You already understand that the shutter controls motion blur, so kudos!


I'd'd like to second these comments. I start in Manual but I often move to other modes depending what I want. I even use the "Scene" modes. I have a friend who is an incredible, professional photographer and he uses whatever mode he thinks suits his needs at the time. He knows his camera so well he knows in advance whether or not he should try to adjust all of the parameters in Manual or just switch to a "Scene" mode. With this approach he's done sunset photos that could go on the wall.
Go to
Nov 16, 2016 08:46:16   #
We've had squirrels tear up a lot of property around our place as well. Not once but twice. Still we like them. We cut a big tree away form our house originally to protect the house from pushing the tree toppling over in a storm but that also removed the access that the squirrels used to get to the roof. Now, when they start getting to close to the house we just go out and fire a couple of shots in the air and they head for the woods and get real cautious for awhile. When they start getting courageous enough to start hanging around the house again two more shotgun blasts into the air and there gone again for awhile.

Other than that you photos are very lovely. Incredible detail, wonderful colors and the expressions on the faces of the squirrels are excellent. True keepers.
Go to
Oct 26, 2016 11:09:45   #
rmm0605 wrote:
Welcome to "the HOG!" Your second photo isn't in focus. The main issue is depth of field. You need to close down the lens aperture to about f8 and focus slightly behind the leading petals. That way the whole flower will be in focus. Otherwise, your shots look good!


John,

I am not an expert or a critic and I want to encourage you as much as I can but I have to agree with this comment. In looking at number 2 my eye just couldn't settle on what the intended focus point was in this otherwise beautiful photograph. When I first started learning photography I spent all of my time learning how to manually operate the camera and learn all of its features only to finally come to the conclusion that getting the camera to focus on exactly what I wanted it to might be the most important skill of all. With "Auto-Focus" being so sophisticated these days I think it is easy to assume that the camera knows best most of the time but in my experience that isn't always true. As I understand it now when you are in some of the "Auto-Focus" modes your camera has to choose between what is the brightest object and what is the closest object in the image you want to photograph and sometimes it chooses something different than what you intended. Even with "Auto-Focus" you still have to make sure it is focusing precisely on the part of the image you want to feature. I think it will benefit your photography greatly to study up on all of the focusing modes on your camera. Choosing between Multi, Center and Spot can make a huge difference in controlling the focus to suit your needs. Also using "Flexible Spot" can be a huge advantage as well. When I first bought my A6000 it was the first full featured camera I ever owned and it has taken me a couple of years to learn how to use it. In fact, I am still learning.

Otherwise I think your photos are generally excellent. I am impressed at how much you seem to have learned so quickly. Judging from the results you are getting already you should be able to learn to use your camera fully in a fraction of the time it took me.

I wish you much success. You're already off to a great start.
Go to
Oct 9, 2016 09:52:39   #
I'd like to see the results as well.
Go to
Oct 9, 2016 09:51:18   #
The Rokinon lens at 12mm and 14mm are both thought to be superior wide angle lenses for the Sony e-mount cameras. Both are affordable.
Go to
Oct 8, 2016 01:58:39   #
CO wrote:
Pro photographers continue to use cameras like the Canon 1DX MkII and Nikon D5. Those are types of cameras seen covering sporting events and the Olympics. Canon and Nikon would have already switched to mirrorless cameras if they proved to be superior.


The reason you see Canon's at sporting events is that Canon (I rarely see anyone using a Nikon at sporting events) still has a lead in the long, telephoto lenses needed for that.

But there's another reason and, maybe a more important reason for professional. I read an interview with a rather successful event and wedding photographer that said he preferred to use his Sony A6000 to his DSLR and did as a second camera but said if you charged the kind of money he gets and show up with a camera that looks like a $200.00 point and shoot you are going to have a hard time collecting your fee no matter what the pictures look like.

Both Nikon and Canon have released mirrorless cameras. They sucked. Canon just released their third mirrorless effort which is supposed to be pretty good. Time will tell.

There may be a third reason. I don't think that Canon or Nikon wants to be seen as chasing Sony in the mirrorless design. With mirrorless cameras being simpler and cheaper to manufacture that would put their DSLR business in a a rut pretty quickly.

The basic trouble with mirrored designs is that in the near future it is going to be more and more difficult to get consumers to pay extra for a component that is completely unnecessary. In fact, it is actually detrimental to the process.

The new Sony RX100 V has shutter speeds and and auto-focusing speeds that are probably impossible to accomplish with a mirrored camera since it is mechanical. At least not at the price of a mirrorless design.
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 18:00:01   #
CO wrote:
Tha phase detection autofocus in a mirrorless camera is an interesting development. You still have an electronic viewfinder though. There can be lag when something is moving through the scene quickly. I know they've been improving that but an optical viewfinder is still superior. Nikon and Canon continue to use optical viewfinders in their top cameras.


I don't consider an optical viewer superior. The limitations of an optical viewfinder compared to an electronic viewfinder are huge. Worse yet is the fact that the inferior optical viewfinder just adds unnecessary weight and cost to the camera. In a few more years optical viewfinders will most likely be history.
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 17:55:07   #
JD750 wrote:
One of the areas where mirrorless interchangeable lens format cameras (MILF) fell short of DSLR performance was in speed of focus. DSLRs utilize phase detection focus systems whereas mirrorless cameras used contrast detection systems which are not as fast in acquiring focus. Well Sony just blew that advantage to smithereens with their new RX100 V.

"Sony has also announced an update to the RX100 and the new iteration is now called Sony RX100 V, as expected. While most of the camera specifications stayed the same (20 MP 1" sensor and 24-70mm equivalent f/1.8-f/2.8 lens), the new RX100 V gains on-sensor phase-detection system to improve its autofocus performance. With a total of 315 phase-detection autofocus points spreading to over 65% of the frame, the camera snaps into focus almost immediately, at record-breaking 0.05 seconds."
Source: http://photographylife.com/sony-rx100-v-announcement#more-132241

0.05 S is pretty fast!
One of the areas where mirrorless interchangeable ... (show quote)


I don't know where you heard this but Sony uses both focusing systems in unison. They also have more focusing points than any other camera as far as I know.
Go to
Oct 4, 2016 10:12:44   #
davidrb wrote:
Linda, you have hit the nail on the head with "amagon". They are the worse shipper in the business. Their "2 day" shipping is a crock. I fired them after they told me the 6 days required to get a new lens to me was MY fault b/c I ordered the item on the "wrong" day. Amagon's entire business is on the "wrong" day. "nameless/ faceless/human-less? More like "we never close/and we never serve. Amagon makes "big box retailers" seem more and more comfortable.
Linda, you have hit the nail on the head with &quo... (show quote)


In all the years I have dealt with Amazon.com they have done nothing but prove that they are deservedly the number one online retailer in the entire world. I get whatever I order on time, every time. Nothing is late. Nothing is screwed up. If I don't like the product I ordered when I get it I return it without any problems. My money is refunded as soon as the return package is checked in at UPS. You can't do any better than that.
Go to
Oct 4, 2016 10:05:11   #
I just can't understand the 10 to 12 days it takes a package to arrive. Otherwise, I am good with all of this. Though I am not a religious person I admire those that are and who are willing to follow their own religious practices even though they may be difficult. These practices are not just difficult for their customers they are difficult for the those that follow these traditions a teachings.

I like doing business with B&H and generally choose them first but if it was inconvenient to use them I would just go to Adorama or Amazon.com. They're are others as well.
Go to
Oct 3, 2016 15:22:04   #
Incredibly I just tried to open my Flickr account and it won't recognize my password either. I had them send me a code to access my account and when I put that in it said that the site is unavailable.

A few moths ago I tried to access my account and several of my "Friend" were no longer available.
Go to
Oct 3, 2016 06:19:48   #
Along the same line I'd like to know what other sights people are using and happy with besides Flickr.
Go to
Sep 28, 2016 20:48:09   #
rwilson1942 wrote:
Phil, here is a shot of the lens. I added the Minolta lens hood because the original was missing when I got the lens.
The lens was used in a lab prior to my getting it. The lens alone will produce 1/2 life size (full frame) adding in the 1.5 crop factor gets 3/4 life size on an ASP-C sensor.
Adding the Macro Extender get you to 1.5:1 on the ASP-C sensor.
Rick


Nice photo actually.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 25 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.