Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: romanticf16
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 279 next>>
Mar 8, 2017 11:57:11   #
It is documented that Wolves and Coyotes in the NorthEast crossbreed. The Coywolf is becoming common in urban areas.
Go to
Mar 8, 2017 11:41:39   #
Gene51 wrote:
No, to your first question, but it might have had an effect on rangefinder cameras, 6cmx9cm, 4x5, 5x7, 8x10 field and view cameras, twin lens reflex cameras from Rollei and Mamiya and the Russian imports, Koni Omega Rapid and other press- and event- friendly cameras, and others.

Real cameras will continue to evolve, and just like the early digitals bear little resemblance to what is out there in form, function and image quality, we won't recognize a digital image capture device 10 yrs from now if it were handed to use today, along with the computing device that you'll need to work on the images.
No, to your first question, but it might have had ... (show quote)


Or did the demise of Kodak as a film /paper manufacturer and rising prices of materials make those formats too expensive to experiment with?
Go to
Mar 7, 2017 17:47:43   #
canon Lee wrote:
I agree that the lighting modes ( daylight, shadow, tungsten, etc). are not affected in the RAW mode. but, the setting I am referring to is a camera color SHIFT adjustment. ( located just below custom WB) , and once in light room it definitely shows up in the adjustment.
I am just curious why the reds blow out. I can desaturate the reds in LR, or adjust WB towards the blue. Doing that sharpens the image as well.


Could the SHIFT adjustment be the same as "calibrate camera? This would be a way to make a Canon match the output of a Nikon or Sony when there are multiple shooters at a wedding or function. Have you tried doing a reset to the camera? Maybe you set something without noticing it and now it is causing problems?
Go to
Mar 7, 2017 15:30:27   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Scammers seem to target older people - more money, but limited mind power - so FL makes sense for them to use as hunting grounds.


Call it a Snowbird Special, put up a FREE sign and you'll always draw a crowd! Always looking for something for nothing. Ripe for the picking!
Go to
Mar 7, 2017 14:59:19   #
If outsourced prints are photographic you should be in the sRGB colorspace for export of your jpeg image. Adobe RGB is a larger colorspace, but when you export to labs the jpegs need to be in the same colorspace they use, which is sRGB. See if this helps with your prints.
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 14:48:47   #
AZ Dog wrote:
Don't you mean the FX sensor?


Yes, thanks.
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 13:29:21   #
4OX wrote:
Love reading and learning from this forum. Learning alot from you guys. Interested in sports photography, landscape, portraits, and drone photography. Printing, editing. Need to learn EVERYTHING about studio lighting, and flash etc. Where to start? I'm in Texas, age 55


Welcome to UHH. If you have any good used bookstores in your area you can learn most techniques from photo era books. Composition, lighting and use of equipment haven't changed much from film to digital. Look for old Petersem's Photographic Magazines for good how to stories.
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 13:10:56   #
BJW wrote:
I've been shooting high school ice hockey in RAW with a Nikon D500 using a Tamron 70-200 f/2.8. I post them on the team website and they look fine. The yearbook staff has asked me if I can increase the resolution of some of my shots so that they will appear sharper in print.

Any advice, suggestions, recommendations of any sort would be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks.
BJ.


You are posting 72dpi jpg images which look fine on a website. You need to be posting 300 dpi jpg images if you intend to print from them.
Go to
Mar 6, 2017 13:03:15   #
lamiaceae wrote:
I'm not sure all of the Nikon speakers here are fluent in Nikon. DX and FX I understand, but Ex? Common but not format designations are AI, SA, ED, AL, IF, SDM, VR. Or we have a joker or Canon discrimination.

To answer your question as most said, DX is for Cropped Factor, FX is for Full Factor. DX & FX lenses may be used on DX cameras; only FX on FX. Yes, many older Nikon film lenses may be used with Nikon DSLRs, but check for specifics and restriction.

For comparison the similar current "terms" for Pentax are DA and FA, and D FA to complicate things a bit. Only the lens are so marked though. The old K, M, A, F designation were for Pentax film lenses.
I'm not sure all of the Nikon speakers here are fl... (show quote)


DX lenses may be used on most FX cameras. If there is a DX setting it'll reduce the area of sensor used. If not the lens may vignette and not fully cover the DX sensor.
Go to
Mar 3, 2017 17:00:27   #
bcheary wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo31_3UzTTY

Pretty interesting concept. I wonder why it is still not around?


If it was being tested in 1929 the year may be a big hint? Not many things sold during the Depression.
Go to
Mar 3, 2017 12:18:43   #
GENorkus wrote:
Once came by the tail end of a photo shoot and noticed they had tied up a bed sheet from a couple trees. (I still don't know if that was for an outdoor backdrop, shading, or to reflect light a bit.) Anyway I guess all turned out well until they started to disassemble things. They couldn't untie the rope to the sheet/tree.

No one had anything to cut with so I handed them my Swiss Army Knife. One guy yelled out those things are not sharp at all and it wouldn't work on nylon rope. I just smiled and told them to try it. Like cutting warm butter, my knife went through the rope. The guy's jaw dropped!

That leads me to wonder:

1 How many carry a knife with them? (short of an airport, etc.)
2 How many keep it sharp?
3 For those who do, what do you sharpen with?

For me, 1 = Yes, 2 = Yes, 3 = A small ceramic "dog-bone". (I hold the knife still at angle and slide the dog bone across, most of the time sliding out to the tip of the blade.)
Once came by the tail end of a photo shoot and not... (show quote)


1-yes; 2-yes, 3-a 6x2 diamond plate.
Go to
Mar 3, 2017 12:09:40   #
RichardSM wrote:
To your question maybe see if its for sale and you can restore it, it looks like it a fixer upper maybe you can get it for fair price. You photos look interesting!


Without sponsors donating products to the restoration for advertising it would be very expensive to save!
Go to
Mar 3, 2017 10:31:50   #
Taken at 28mm you're "bait", at 300mm you're a photographer.
Go to
Mar 2, 2017 12:11:18   #
jerryc41 wrote:
He sees men with dark skin. They must be Iranians. He shoots them.

I can understand that people want to kill terrorists, but workers of Indian heritage employed by Garmin are not Iranian terrorists. The US Census estimates that there are about a million Iranians living in the USA. Many Sikhs have been killed because stupid people though they were Arabs. Do we have an open hunting season on Arabs? I know there is strong sentiment against "brainy" people who are "overly educated," but there's also a case to be made for somehow getting enough basic knowledge into the thick skulls of the millions of truly dangerous people around us - the stupid ones.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/02/28/fbi-investigating-shooting-of-two-indian-men-in-kansas-as-a-hate-crime/?utm_term=.3b3f389444e3&wpisrc=nl_rainbow&wpmm=1
He sees men with dark skin. They must be Iranians... (show quote)


Wonder if he had a Trump hat on?
Go to
Mar 2, 2017 12:04:19   #
GENorkus wrote:
Both of my dslr's have four batteries each. I've had battery grips on them so two at a time is normal. All the batteries have been marked as to when I purchased them. Two factory batts came with the purchase of Pentax K20D camera with grip in March 2009, (8 years old). A non-factory batt on January 2010, (basically 7 years old) and another non-factory batt on March 2011, (6 years old). They all get regular use since I switch then around all the time.

Last year I noticed the non factory batts were getting a touch snug in the camera portion of my K20D but they came out fine so I let things go. This "snugness" slowly increased over six months and became, (for lack of a better word), "snugger".

Tonight I used them at a high school basketball game and found the camera battery was almost impossible to remove. I had to pry it out with a dentil pick since nothing else was small enough to reach in. Looking at both non-factory batts, I noticed a very small bulge. The two factory batts are 1 to 2 years older but do not show any signs of bulging... yet.

Looking at my other camera Pentax K5, all four of the batts, (purchased June 2013, almost four years old), are non-factory and are all just starting to feel snug in the camera body.

Recapping batt conditions:
LI50 = 8 YO = Both Pentax batts are good.
LI50 = 6 and 7 YO = Both non-factory batts do not fit well at all.

LI90 = 4 YO = All four non-factory batts are just starting to swell a bit.

Question:
Yes I know it's time to replace a bunch of batteries but I'd like to know what caused them to slightly swell up and why the non-factory only. (Are they that cheaply built?)
Both of my dslr's have four batteries each. I've h... (show quote)


Most likely they are leaking internally, reacting with the casing metal.Stop using them!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 279 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.