Also, look at opportunity for end of month... Super, Blue, Blood Moon (if you're in the right spot to catch the eclipse)!
Canon Refurb has 80D & 18-55 kit lens for $729. Buy that & keep or sell the extra lens. Either way you have Canon original & save $70!
joer wrote:
Not recommended according to Nikon and I believe that as well.
I could have easily improved the images with PP.
OK, sorry. I'm a Canon guy. I assumed you could fine-tune them like you can with Canon 80D & above. For me that's a feature, not a limitation.
Chicopee wrote:
I mechanic told me a couple of years ago when I had a rodent chew the wires to my ABS harness in the back of my Honda Civic..... mind you this was a lease vehicle so I was very upset. He informed me that in years past the wiring was wrapped with an oil based product which was environmentally hazardous. So the automotive industry switched from oil based to soy-based, and rodents of all kinds love it. I wrote a letter of complaint to the company feeling if this is the case they should find a better protective wrap to go Over these soy-based wires so they are not so vulnerable.
I mechanic told me a couple of years ago when I ha... (
show quote)
At least it's eco-friendly!
Micro focus adjustments needed for each lens??
I don't view anything on UHH without part of the experience being to learn. Yes, it is enjoyable to just view the picture, but it's nice to also appreciate the thought, effort, and skill that is part of the story. So, I appreciate comments with the exposure settings, and PP info to see how the image evolved into its finished form. I really don't care too much about the brand of the camera or lens, but the lens focal length info is also useful in appreciating the finished product.
russelray wrote:
The 45 single in my music collection lists the running time as 3:29.
The digital version provided to YouTube by Sony Music Entertainment has a running time of 3:35:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np_66D-KrK8Any other versions, especially on YouTube, are videos created by fans, so there's no telling how long the running time might be.
"Kodachrome" peaked at #2 on the Billboard Hot 100 singles chart. Ever since then, all other things being equal, Nikon has always been just a wee bit more expensive than Canon and the others. Remember, I said "all other things being equal." It's the reason why I switched from Nikon to Canon when I went to buy a new camera in 1978 and am still with Canon today.
The 45 single in my music collection lists the run... (
show quote)
All good info, but I still don't know what Funny detail @ 3:38... the OP was talking about.
OK, you need to be more specific. My results for the search on Google came up with a bunch of different renditions. The first was only 3:33 long, so I never got to 3:38. Please post the actual link to which you are referring.
"Isis" - Good name for a terrorist kitty!
Sounds interesting. I'll be looking forward to pricing & reviews after it's launched.
bsprague wrote:
"None of the programs I tested ticked all the boxes in providing all the functions and image quality of the Adobe products."
"....as I’ve described, none of the programs tick all the boxes. Each has strengths, but also weaknesses, if not outright deficiencies. I don’t feel any can fully replace Adobe products for features and image quality."
Maybe there is good reason that Adobe profits continue to grow and their CC subscribers are estimated to be above 10,000,000! Adobe can still commit blunders!
br "None of the programs I tested ticked all... (
show quote)
It's a lousy review article! It compares a suite of four Adobe programs to individual programs from other vendors. I recently bought Corel PSP, which came with their After Shot program. Together they do all I need. This article is only reviewing After Shot! Same with other programs reviewed. This is an unfair comparison! It is like reviewing vehicles by comparing a whole car to another manufacturer's engine alone. Totally USELESS!!!
Never noticed. I just turn it both ways until I get the picture I want!