Using a camera and post precessing to create an image is certainly photography. With varying degrees of change, an image that began in a camera can be called photography or art, depending on its creator and receiving users.
Usually. for juried exhibitions, a distinction is made between photography and digitally manipulated photos, the former limiting post processing to the darkroom-available tools of dodging, burning, contrast, toning.
In galleries, the dealer and artist decide on advertising, calling the works what they want. Labels are important.
Your piece, I could see, or jury, in a "Photography" show or category. I could also see or jury it in an Art show, where the label would describe it.

I don't care for the look. For me it's mostly because of the color and shapes of the brown subject, kind of icky I do like the colors and patterns of the shingles behind, with maybe less of the vine just creeping in from edges. But that is a different story from what was presented.

Regarding your question, does it make any difference in a forum like For Your Consideration? I greatly appreciate that this section is a place where folks can experiment to their heart's delight! Definitions are kinda boring, and limiting and not at all the point.

We post our highly stylized and/or experimental projects to see if they have interest for others (curiosity) and to get feedback to possibly expand or better define our original vision. And folks cooperate by giving us their honest, considered opinions. Well, except the time magnetoman said I should just try harder 🤟❤️