Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rdubreuil
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 65 next>>
Jan 7, 2019 08:51:42   #
mvovr wrote:
Hi! This is Debbie! I've fiddled with a DSL since my kids were little, & what came out was fine. Ive upgraded to a Nikon D 5300 & took a class, wanting to get serious & get better pics that dont need so much post editing. I'm doing okay, until it comes time to hit the ice rink! Between the sheet of ice, bright fluorescent light, & fast movement, I'm a mess! I like to use my 70-300 lens to get close-ups, but it won't always auto focus for me. Shooting in shutter priority helps a bit, but my shots come out dark with the ice looking gray. What the heck?!
So this shot had some editing...I'd like to get this with my settings. Thanks!
Hi! This is Debbie! I've fiddled with a DSL since ... (show quote)


Lots of good advice to this point, unfortunately with the lens you have you'll never get the results you're looking for the 70-300mm is an f/4.5 - 5.6, you'll always have to PP your images as best you can and deal with the noise. To achieve what you're looking for will require a much faster lens, a f/2.8 at minimum for your zoom. Or a couple even faster primes, even then you'll be upping your ISO to maintain shutter speed.
Go to
Jan 1, 2019 12:26:05   #
MT Shooter wrote:
XQD are not going to be soon obsolete any more than CF are obsolete now. The CFE technology is faster and will be adopted by those cameras needing such speed. I feel most XQD cameras now will be upgraded to CFE eventually, but will still be backwards compatible to XQD in much the same way that SDXC compatible cameras are still backwards compatible to SDHC cards, and even original SD cards.
CFast technology was unable to use the antiquated CF transfer connections so they are never going to be backwards compatible to those cameras. To date there is only one DSLR that even accepts CFast and that is the Canon 1DX MK II. Canon will as it has in the past refuse to adopt the newer technology simply because Nikon is using it and they will continue to use CFast, at least for awhile.
To me the CFast and CFExpress argument is VERY much like the old VHS/Betamax battle and only one will survive once all the smoke clears.
XQD are not going to be soon obsolete any more tha... (show quote)


Sounds like you're right on the money there. Thanks.
Go to
Jan 1, 2019 12:20:15   #
In checking out the manual on Nikonusa.com, without a hot shoe, and apparently without a commander mode for the pop up flash, I'd say your might be SOL.
Go to
Jan 1, 2019 11:58:57   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Absolutely NOT. CFast is the next generation SATA card introduced in 2012 and almost identical in size and shape to the CF card which is PATA interface. CFast cards are not compatible with CF card slots due to minor changes to the case slides and different pin connectors.
XQD cards are PCIe interface and are little more than half the size of CF or CFast cards. They have an all new connector system which relies on slides rather than pins much in the same way as SD cards do. The next generation of cards using the XQD case style will be CFExpress cards which will fit XQD slots and will be usable in most XQD equipped cameras via a firmware update.
Absolutely NOT. CFast is the next generation SATA ... (show quote)


MT,

Do you think this spells the obsolescence of XQD in lieu of CFE cards for those with XQD equipped cameras? With the advent of Lexar no longer producing XQD cards and leaving really only Sony and rumored production by Nikon that I'm aware of.
Go to
Jan 1, 2019 11:46:07   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I got an unexpected email today from Tamron USA. It seems I have achieved a level of "Top Ten" Tamron salesmen in the entire USA. Its hard to believe my little one man store has moved so many Tamron lenses.
Along with some gifts and accolades, the main award is an all expense paid 4 day trip to Miami this coming February. 4 days in Miami in February will be a very welcome break from these cold Montana winter days.
Our hotel will be in Miamis South Beach area and 1/2 block from the beach. One evening will be a walking photo tour of Little Havana after dinner there, followed by a 4am trip to shoot a sunrise over the Atlantic. Looking forward to it all.
Hard work does pay off sometimes! 😁😁
I got an unexpected email today from Tamron USA. I... (show quote)


Congratulations MT, well deserved I'm sure. Enjoy you're trip, be safe, and shoot a bunch. We look forward to your sharing some of those images. You're very much appreciated here too on UHH. Have a very happy New Year and may you achieve the same for 2019.
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 10:27:05   #
larryepage wrote:
To me, one obvious choice would be to shoot and save as TIFFs until the software gets updated. No extra processing steps, no image degradation, no extra software to install.


TIFF still doesn't have the latitude of RAW. From NikonUSA.com


Exclusive to Nikon cameras, the NEF is Nikon's RAW file format. RAW image files, sometimes referred to as digital negatives, contain all the image information captured by the camera's sensor, along with the image's metadata (the camera's identification and its settings, the lens used and other information). The NEF file is written to the memory card in either an uncompressed or "lossless" compressed form.

The primary benefit of writing images to the memory card in NEF format rather than TIFF or JPEG is that no in-camera processing for white balance, hue, tone and sharpening are applied to the NEF file; rather, those values are retained as instruction sets included in the file. You can change the instruction set as many times as you like without ever disturbing the original image's RAW data. Another benefit of the NEF file is that depending on the camera, it retains 12-bit or 14-bit data, resulting in an image with a far greater tonal range than an eight-bit JPEG or TIFF file.

After-capture processing of the NEF file by Nikon's Capture NX2 software, or other imaging programs, offers greater control over the final image than the processing of a JPEG or a TIFF. After processing, the NEF file can be saved as a TIFF, JPEG or again as a NEF with the addition of any applied Capture NX2 processing saved inside the file as a second or alternate instruction set. As long as the original NEF file is preserved, the "digital negative" remains untouched; processing a NEF file does not alter the original instruction set.

https://www.nikonusa.com/en/learn-and-explore/a/products-and-innovation/nikon-electronic-format-nef.html
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 10:15:33   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
You can also process it in the Nikon software, just as with any RAW software, and you could save it as TIFF or PSD.


Yes I know, but the statement was to save them out as jpeg prior to PP. Which negates having shot them in RAW in the first place to get the additional latitude for post processing an unbaked file.
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 06:42:31   #
keg403 wrote:
I downloaded Luminar 3 and when I opened it, it looks like it imported all my photos (don't like that - don't want them all in Luminar). I didn't investigate too far because it is slow, but looks like all my photos are in there 3 times.

I then downloaded the update, which is supposed to take care of duplication?, and I still see three of each photo. Anyone know 1)How do I get rid of the duplicates? 2)As an alternative, how do I uninstall the current Luminar3 and reinstall later? Anyone think that will fix the duplication - starting over from scratch?

I'm using Windows10
I downloaded Luminar 3 and when I opened it, it lo... (show quote)


Skylum just release a bug fix update, check your help menu for the check for updates. You should also have received an e-mail notice on the subject.
Go to
Dec 31, 2018 06:30:23   #
cameraf4 wrote:
Nikon provides free software for use with its cameras. They used to include a CD in the box but now you can go to a Nikon website and download Nikon View and/or Nikon Capture free of charge. Use them to open the NEFs and convert them to JPGs. Then you can load the JPGs into whatever PP software you like.


??? This approach defeats the purpose of having shot in RAW to begin with, may as well have just shot in jpeg.
Go to
Dec 28, 2018 14:15:22   #
Sylvia,

Glad to hear you're okay, get well soon.
Go to
Dec 27, 2018 10:59:18   #
In chronological order: Still have them all too.

Minolta X-7A (35mm film)

Minolta Z-1 (3.2MP Bridge Camera)

Kyocera/Yashica Finecam S5 (5MP P&S)

Nikon Coolpix L Series (7.1MP P&S)

Nikon D3300

Nikon D90

Nikon D500

Nikon D810

And currently saving for a D850
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 05:14:06   #
orchid1 wrote:
Okay, I may have my metering set wrong. I do not have and understanding of center weighted etc. In your opinion where should it be set for a novice like me.


Matrix metering, it will evaluate the entire scene.
Go to
Dec 24, 2018 05:31:06   #
camerapapi wrote:
First thing first, I have never owned or used a D90 and all I know about it is what I have learned and heard from owners. The general consensus is that it is an excellent amateur tool.
It is not a professional camera nor was it intended for professionals. In good hands it is capable of excellent images.
If you are buying used look at the cosmetics first, it should tell you a lot about how the camera was cared for. Make sure AF and exposure meters work. Although the number of shutter actuations is important the majority of the cameras are good for over 100,000 shots.
Used gear could need cleaning, lubrication and adjustments and I would recommend that if you buy the camera that type of maintenance should be done for peace of mind and for better performance.
If you can test the camera that surely will help to determine how good it performs. If the price is reasonable go for it.
First thing first, I have never owned or used a D9... (show quote)


Actually when the D90 was released Nikon considered it a Prosumer camera.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikon_D90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

The Nikon D90 is a 12.3 megapixel digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) model announced by Nikon on August 27, 2008. It is a prosumer model that replaces the Nikon D80, fitting between the company's entry-level and professional DSLR models. It has a Nikon DX format crop sensor.

Nikon gave the D90's Estimated Selling Price in the United States as US$899.95 for the body alone[2] and as $1299.99 with the Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR, which by itself sold for $399.95. Street prices were generally lower.[3][4]

The D90 was the first DSLR with video recording capabilities. In May 2009, the D90 won the TIPA European Photo & Imaging Award, in the "Best D-SLR Advanced" category
Go to
Dec 21, 2018 13:42:01   #
Smiling Elk wrote:
Something that is one I never considered until recently is WHITE BALANCE. Specifically when shooting RAW photos. Learn as much as you can.


White balance is pretty much irrelevant when shooting RAW, no so for Jpg though.
Go to
Dec 21, 2018 13:30:37   #
Silverman wrote:
I myself purchased a used Nikon D3300 kit on Ebay about 6 months ago, 2 lens, Nikon 18-55 DX VRII and Nikon 55-200 DX VRII, so far have performed as expected, the 3400 is the upgraded model, newest D3000 line, please let us know how your Nikon D3400 performs and possibly what upgrades have been added to the Nikon D3400, I personally would like to know, if it would be worth upgrading from my Nikon D3300.
I myself purchased a used Nikon D3300 kit on Ebay ... (show quote)


Keep your D3300 it's better than the D3400, the only upgrade was the addition of crap bridge, and the down grade was the removal of the sensor cleaning function.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 65 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.