Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: bruswen
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 next>>
Dec 28, 2015 06:24:19   #
MT Shooter wrote:
It has a fixed 28mm F2.8 (equivalent) lens. It does have the same APS-C 16.2MP sensor as was used in the D7000 DSLR body, its a very good sensor. It will also shoot RAW, has a hotshoe, and does Full HD Video with a stereo mic. Its already discontinued and replacement(s) are due by Spring 2016. The $299 refurb price also carries a 10% discount right now as well as free shipping making it $269. Very good quality images if you can live with the fixed focal length lens.


In addition, Nikon removed the anti-aliasing filter on the sensor, so the Coolpix A gives more detailed images than the D7000. I actually own and use a Coolpix A, I have found the lcd display to be adequately bright so I do not miss a viewfinder. The fixed focal length lens is better at 18.5mm than most other lens Nikon makes that reach 18mm, most of them have lots of distortion. This camera can shoot at ISO 1000 without noise and it has a f/2.8 lens, it is good in low light but it does not have VR so there are some limits regarding shutter speed. The dynamic range is comparable to the D7000 and I like the color rendition better. At the current $269 price it is a bargain. If you like shooting at that focal length get one, you won't be disappointed.
Go to
Dec 27, 2015 07:42:05   #
Just Dawn wrote:
I have a nikon dx format and want to buy a good, fast lens for portraiture. I've heard that the 85mm f/1.8 is the way to go. My question is, since I'm shooting on a dx format camera should I get a 50mm or something similar since I'll need to multiply the range by 1.5? Or will the 85mm f/1.8 still be the best option? Also, the lens I'm interested in is made for fx format but the description says it will work fine on dx format as well. Any feedback would be much appreciated as I'm pretty new to this forum as well as photography in general. Thank you.
I have a nikon dx format and want to buy a good, f... (show quote)


The short answer is, on a dx body, a 50mm f/1.8 is a very versatile lens and gives you the most bang for the buck. Having said that, if you have been working with a zoom on a dx body and have shot some portraits that please you, check the focal length you were shooting at, this would be a good indicator of what works for you in terms of working distance and perspective.
Go to
Dec 26, 2015 03:31:06   #
Cykdelic wrote:
My better half has a nice little Sony A6000 and would like a tripod for it. Hmmmmm? Sounds like a nice Christmas gift.

Any ideas out there on a nice one? I want to make sure it's stable enough to hold up her camera with. 55-210 lens.

Any help is appreciated.


There are some questions you should be able to answer when you go to choose a tripod:
How will it be used? At home? Travel? Hiking?
What type of photography does your wife enjoy? Landscape? Macro? Portrait? Birds/animals?
Will she be carrying the tripod any distance?
These are some you can start with.

Good luck!
Go to
Dec 25, 2015 05:39:49   #
SDB777 wrote:
Pretty much as the title suggests....."How do you afford it?"



If it is important to you, you will find a way. If you value other things more, then that is where you will spend your money.
Go to
Dec 11, 2015 06:44:41   #
bkellyusa wrote:
I've been wanting to get a flashlight to use for at night photography to add fill light, help with focusing and things like that. I'd love to get one with variable output that could be set very low and I'd like to get one that focuses the beam. I've looked and can't quite find anything like that but if anyone has any suggestions I'd love to hear them.


I recommend the Fenix LD12 G2, it has settings as low as 3 lumens and as high as 125 lumens. Fenix makes a red filter for this flashlight, it can be used to preserve night vision. The beam does not focus, but it is small and uses 1 AA battery. Very easy to fit anywhere, pocket or camera bag.

http://smile.amazon.com/Fenix-Compact-Flashlight-Battery-LumenTac/dp/B00C31G24M/ref=sr_1_1?s=outdoor-recreation&ie=UTF8&qid=1449833842&sr=1-1&keywords=fenix+ld12
Go to
Dec 8, 2015 05:35:59   #
avemal wrote:
Driving myself nuts on what to buy!!!! Any input put would be appreciated. Thanks


I own both lenses, the f/1.8G is a simpler design, lighter, focuses a little faster (IMO), and is better at wide (f/1.8-f/2.8) apertures. The f/1.4G is a better overall performer (especially above f/4) on a full frame body. On an APS-C sensor body the f/1.8G is an easy choice, on a full frame it depends on how and what you plan to shoot.
Go to
Dec 3, 2015 18:02:10   #
Lionel1954 wrote:
Check your users guide, are you sure it can take a wired release? On my D300 I can use a cable release but I can't use a cable release on my D7100, on the D7100 I have to use the ML-3 IR release. Check also if the camera menu must be set. You'll get more info from the other Hogs as well.


Your D7100 should work with the Nikon - MC-DC2 Remote Release Cord which is different from the Nikon MC-30A Remote Trigger Release you use with your D300.
Go to
Dec 3, 2015 05:28:33   #
shoes wrote:
Hi all,
Purchased a Nikon wired cable release. Plugged it into camera port on my Nikon D 5100. Set up the camera on my tripod, focused on my subject, pushed the button but nothing happened. No matter what I have tried there is absolutely no response from the camera.
Any of you UHHers have any ideas or suggestions?


Is the slide lock for bulb engaged?
Go to
Dec 2, 2015 11:15:33   #
NoSocks wrote:
My daughter is in the market for a new camera but is on a limited budget. Her D70 died leaving her with only an 18-55 mm lens. She started looking at the D5500 but I've read a couple of comparisons that seem to indicate there is very little difference between that and the D5300. She could save a few bucks that she could puttowardanotherlens. Any opinions?


I would suggest you check out a refurbished D7100, it is currently selling for under $500 at Adorama, it is more closely related to the D70, product line development by Nikon goes D70, D80, D90, D7000, D7100. The controls for the D7100 would be more familiar to your daughter, it is more solidly constructed, and the 51 point auto focus is far superior than any of the D5xxx series cameras.
Go to
Nov 18, 2015 09:51:59   #
OnDSnap wrote:
Another thing you might try to get the reach and performance you want, I suggest you rent the new 200-500mm f/5.6 lens from Nikon. The people who have reported on it here give it good reviews though most shoot birds or wildlife, I have not seen a report on sport shooting with that lens, but at $1400 it is in a similar price range as the D7200.


I see your point but, but...with my 70-200mm f2.8 on a cropped sensor with a 2x TC, I get pretty much the same thing ...200mm x 1.5 = 300mm angle of view X 2.o TC =600mm @ f/5.6. Why spend $1,400 on another lens I can replicate. Unless I'm missing something, other than getting 1000mm from the 500mm with the 2x TC but then I'm down to f/11, unless I'm mistaken, you can't use a 2xTC with a combined f stop over f/8. (Hope I said that right)[/quote]

I thought having a 500mm that you could use with your D750 and shoot at higher ISO might be a solution for your dilemma. You found the noise from your D7000 unacceptable, so this would allow you to get similar reach with lower noise in your images using the D750. The truth is there is no DX body/lens combo that will give you the same low light performance as this combo because with the D750 you can shoot at much higher ISO's and still get clean images.
Go to
Nov 18, 2015 07:13:52   #
OnDSnap wrote:
I need something better in low light, and simply a sharper image... I also have a D750 along with the so called Holy trinity lenses plus some. So glass isn't the issue. After shooting a while with the D750 and comparing the results I get with my D7000...which is huge. Aside from the obvious, I was thinking maybe replacing the D7000 with either the D7100 or D7200. Thoughts? Advice? from current owners of the latter two.
the question for those who have moved from the 7000, Is the 7100 or 7200 any better?
I need something better in low light, and simply a... (show quote)


I have both the D7000 and the D7200, the D7200 is better than the D7000 and is likely the best APS-C DSLR for low light shooting you can buy, BUT the reality is the D7000 produced clean images up to ISO 1000, the D7200 now reaches ISO 1200 before you see noise. The EXPEED 4 processor in the D7200 processes the noise differently, there is less chroma noise visable in the images, but lumina noise, which is harder to remove, is still present. Low noise is a function of sensor size and pixel size, larger sensors receive more light, larger pixels generate a stronger signal, both reduce noise. If you want to shoot at ISO 3000 with little noise, you need a full frame sensor.

Another thing you might try to get the reach and performance you want, I suggest you rent the new 200-500mm f/5.6 lens from Nikon. The people who have reported on it here give it good reviews though most shoot birds or wildlife, I have not seen a report on sport shooting with that lens, but at $1400 it is in a similar price range as the D7200.
Go to
Oct 14, 2015 07:02:16   #
EmilMiller wrote:
That's an excellent review Bruswen, you answered some critical questions for me. Much appreciated.


I'm glad I could help.
Go to
Oct 14, 2015 05:45:46   #
EmilMiller wrote:
For those who have the D7200, have you experienced the same speed with the processor in it? Anybody with direct use of both cameras would be extremely helpful.
Thanks in advance for any replies.


My experience is with the D7000 and the D7200. The D7200 has a larger memory buffer which will give you 18 shots without slowing down shooting RAW + JPEG fine. Shooting JPEG you get about 100 shots before the buffer fills. The biggest difference I have noticed with the EXPEED 4 processor is the way noise is handled. There is a noticeable reduction in chroma noise, but lumina noise is still present. As far as I know they use the same sensor, the changes to processing were made to reduce the green banding that appeared is some low light images with the D7100. The D7200 also allows you to bracket 9 frames vs. 5 frames with the D7100. Only you can decide if the differences are enough to step up to the D7200, most people are very happy with either body.
Go to
Sep 25, 2015 00:33:16   #
I received mine yesterday, I posted a couple of test shots in the gallery section taken with a D7200 and a Nikon TC-14E II teleconverter. One of the appeals to me was the fixed aperture allowing use of a teleconverter.

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-339055-1.html
Go to
Sep 24, 2015 19:00:34   #
jeanbug35 wrote:
Now all we need is an eagle. The lens is doing great.


The eagles have been nesting here in one of our city parks for about eight years. When they have eggs/hatchlings at least one parent is at the nest constantly (from March to June). Now I'm really looking forward to next Spring.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.