:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

I love it! If she was elected to "dog catcher" she would have to arrest herself! That's the funniest thing I've heard so far this year!



.

If That's Not An Insane Bitch I've Never Seen An Insane Bitch!

Twurdlow..........

You simply can't get anything straight, can you? You can't even follow a discussion without getting everyone mixed up! If you refuse to believe that Shrillary's campaign is "going to hell" and is like a train that's "off the tracks", that's perfectly OK with me! (I really wouldn't have expected anything else from an idiot like you! Here's an idea for you; if you don't believe this story, why don't you call up a few of Shrillary's "schmucks" and ask THEM "how things are going?

You keep talking about "Dick Nixon".......may I remind you, Mr. Nixon is DEAD......has been for quite some time now.......and anything he "did" or "didn't do" has nothing what-so-ever to do with the daily crimes being committed by YOUR "hero", Shrillary Clinton! Like ALL liberals, when anyb of YOUR compatriots get caught with their hands in the cookie jar, YOU immediately start blathering about "what someone else did" many years ago! With your ridiculous line of reasoning, I suppose you must think that if you were caught robbing a bank, all you would have to do is start grumbling that "people have been robbing banks for years and years now, so I'm just "doing what everyone else is doing"!

The next time you get caught robbing a bank, I suggest you try that Twurdlow........and please be sure to let us all know how that "worked out"! BTW......your pathetic attempt to discredit Judge Andrew Napolitano........I posted many years of his accomplishments, his sterling record, has admirable and scholarly reputation, and attempted to compare it to your's..........(even though YOU don't have anything to brag about!) But you still think peoplem are going to pay attention to you when you attempt to "bad-mouth" someone with a distinguished background like Judge Napolitano has?

And you reference to "what I bring to the discussion".......may I remind you Twurdlow, I'm the one who STARTED this "discussion"! ) And I don't recall anyone inviting a half-wit such as yourself to participate! So.....if you have a problem with "what I bring to the discussion", please feel to go jump into the nearest lake! Lol! ROFLMAO! (You do know what "ROFLMAO" means don't you, Twurdlow, or do I need to explain that to you also? )

Oh.....quote; "And the FBI doesn't announce their "intentions" to seek an indictment of anyone. They just do it, or they don't.

And, who announced it?

Show me". unquote;

There was a whole news story about it Twurdlow! I'll go back and see if I can find it again and post it....(just for you! )

Quote; "And finally, "Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet at the DOJ" is not informed what the FBI is going to do; he permits it, if he approves. That's why he is head of the Justice Department; he tells the FBI what to do. Period. Unquote;

Twurdlow.......you have just demonstrated your complete and total lack of knowledge about what you are attempting to talk about! First....Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet at the DOJ" is not a "he"........his fat-ass "puppet" at the DOJ is a 4th rate black female attorney named Loretta Lynch; Second: L.L. is: The A.G. of the U.S. (That stands for "Attorney General", Turdlow; Third; you are completely "full of crap" when you say that the AG "tells" the F.B.I. "what to do"! The Federal Bureau of Investigation is quite unlike most (if not all) Federal Bureaus; it has a "Charter"......this "Charter" "tells it what to do"......and fortunately for the American people, the Director ofv the F.B.I., James Comey, is an honorable man, (quite unlike Loretta Lynch I might add), and is "doing his job" just like the F.B.I.'s Charter "instructs" him to do it!

As to "who announced it"......the F.B.I. "announced it" you idiot! I have't even had time to read the damned story yet! I'm still wasting my damned time here, attempting to "educate" a moron (named "Twurdlow! )

BTW........I asked you a direct question yesterday.....are you or are you not, queer? I have a reason for asking this....you'll be very surprised "when & if" I decide to tell you my reason for asking if you are of the "limp wrist" category.......

Twurdlow, I have to ask you something......just a simple, "yes" or "no" will be fine!

Are you QUEER, Twurdlow? (I'll tell you later why I ask )

I think you better go have your head X-rayed now, Twurdlow! Your imbecilic attempt to make Judge Andrew Napolitano look like some "schmuck" is going to be a very tough sell!


Andrew Napolitano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Judge of the New Jersey Superior Court
In office
1987–1995
Appointed by Thomas Kean

Born Andrew Peter Napolitano[1]
June 6, 1950 (age 65)
Newark, New Jersey

Alma mater Princeton University
University of Notre Dame
Occupation Judge (1987–1995)
Attorney (1975–present)
Media Personality (1998–present)
Professor of Law (1980–1981; 1989–2000; 2013–present)
Religion Roman Catholic[2]

Andrew Peter Napolitano (born June 6, 1950) is the Senior Judicial Analyst for Fox News Channel, commenting on legal news and trials, and is a syndicated columnist whose work appears in numerous publications, such as Fox News, The Washington Times, and Reason. Having served as a New Jersey Superior Court Judge, he now teaches constitutional law as a Distinguished Professor at Brooklyn Law School. Napolitano has written nine books on constitutional, legal, and political subjects.

Early life and judicial and academic career

Napolitano was born in Newark, New Jersey. He is a graduate of Princeton University and Notre Dame Law School. He was admitted to the New Jersey State Bar Association in 1975.[3] After law school, Napolitano entered private practice as a litigator. Napolitano first taught law for a brief period in 1980–1981 at Delaware Law School (then-Widener). Napolitano sat on the New Jersey bench from 1987 to 1995, becoming the state's youngest then-sitting Superior Court judge.

As a judge, Napolitano issued several notable decisions. In State v. Barcia, Napolitano found that random DWI roadblock checkpoints were unconstitutional under both the Federal and New Jersey state constitutions, and sustained a motion to suppress drug and drug paraphernalia evidence found at such a stop.[4] In the case In re K.L.F., Napolitano found that New Jersey’s Frivolous Pleading Statute could be applied against the state as well as private litigants whose claims were frivolous.[5] In Cusseaux v. Pickett, Napolitano decided that a woman who was abused and mistreated by her husband has a civil cause of action against her abuser for the resulting battered woman syndrome.[6]

He resigned his judgeship in 1995 for private practice. He later pursued a writing, teaching, and television career. He also served as an adjunct professor at Seton Hall University School of Law for 11 years from 1989–2000. Napolitano is a distinguished visiting professor at Brooklyn Law School where he teaches courses on advanced and introductory constitutional law and jurisprudence, and has begun a renewed endeavor to developing his natural law jurisprudence.

Before joining Fox as a news analyst, Napolitano was the presiding judge for the first season of Twentieth Television's syndicated court show Power of Attorney (2000–02), in which people brought small-claims disputes to a televised courtroom. Differing from similar formats, the plaintiffs and defendants were represented pro bono by famous attorneys. Napolitano departed the series after its first season.

From 2006 to 2010, Napolitano co-hosted a talk radio show on Fox News Radio with Brian Kilmeade titled Brian and the Judge. Napolitano hosted a libertarian talk show called Freedom Watch that aired daily, with new episodes on weekdays, on Fox Business Channel. Frequent guests on Freedom Watch were Congressman Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell. Napolitano has promoted the works of Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises on his program. The show originally aired once a week, every Wednesday at 2:00 p.m. on Fox News' Strategy Room.
On September 14, 2009, it became a show that aired three to four times a week. On June 12, 2010, it debuted as a weekly show on Fox Business. The show was one of several programs dropped in February 2012, when FBN revamped its entire primetime lineup.[7]

Napolitano regularly substituted for television host Glenn Beck when Beck was absent from his program. After Beck announced that he would be leaving Fox News, he asked Napolitano to replace him.[8] Napolitano regularly provides legal analysis on top rated shows both Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network, such as The Kelly File, The O’Reilly Factor, Varney & Co., The Fox Report with Shepard Smith, Fox & Friends, and Special Report with Bret Baier.

Napolitano is a well-known libertarian who is a strong advocate of constitutional protections against government encroachment on natural and legal rights, as well as a strong advocate of broad constitutional liberties themselves. Napolitano has demonstrated affinity for many libertarian thinkers, such as John Locke, Friedrich Hayek, Murray Rothbard, Robert Nozick, Randy Barnett, Ayn Rand, and Ludwig von Mises, and a broad array of libertarian ideas aimed at a minimal state aimed at the preservation of personal liberty. Napolitano is noted for stalwartly disagreeing with conservatives on questions of personal freedom, national security, and equality, while also engaging in full-throated defense of more conservative ideas of economic freedom and scope of government.

Napolitano describes himself as pro-life and holds that abortion "should be prohibited."[9] He reasons while a woman has a natural and undeniable right to privacy in her personal choices, the rule of necessity causes the right to life of the fetus, which he believes to begin at conception, to take priority for the duration of gestation. Napolitano believes the Supreme Court's ruling on inter-racial marriage in the 1967 case Loving v. Virginia set a precedent that would also require state recognition of same-sex marriage.[10] He also opposes capital punishment: "I don't believe that the state has the moral authority to execute."[11] Napolitano is also a believer in the separation of Church and State.

With respect to both Presidents Bush and Obama and their handling of civil liberties in the War on Terror, Napolitano is a strong critic. In both his recent scholarly work, appearing in the New York University Law School Journal of Law and Liberty, and in his book Suicide Pact, Napolitano delivered detailed criticisms of the actions of both Presidents and their parties with respect to torture, domestic spying, unilateral executive action, and encroachments on political power.

Two weeks after a segment on Geraldo Rivera’s program in 2010 about how the collapse of the 7 World Trade Center appeared more consistent with controlled demolition than collapse, Napolitano made comments on the Alex Jones show that have been interpreted as sympathetic to 9/11 truthers.[12] The extent to which his statements expressed sympathy with those who were skeptical of the events, finding them “hard to believe” because of Geraldo’s program, rather than acceptance of a conspiracy theory, has been a topic of debate.[13] His most extensive work on the topic of 9/11, Suicide Pact, does not express any sympathy with the position, nor have any of his public statements since.[original research?]

Napolitano believes that President Obama’s recent Executive Order on immigration is an unconstitutional use of executive power. He argues that as the president’s exercise of prosecutorial discretion is directly opposite to the will of the United States Congress, it cannot be sustained as an exercise of prosecutorial discretion pursuant to an act of Congress, but rather is an independent presidential act.

Judge Napolitano ascribes to a natural law jurisprudence that is influenced with a respect for originalist ideas and method. He has expressed strong sympathies with the Randy Barnett new originalist vein of originalism, as it incorporates the Natural Law through an original understanding of the Ninth Amendment. He has published a favorable column on Barnett’s idea of a constitutional presumption of liberty.[15] While Napolitano’s academic work as of late has tended to focus on issue-specific concerns of the Natural Law and rights,[16] he aims to more fully develop a jurisprudential theory around his conception of the demands of the Natural Law.

Napolitano’s philosophy generally has a strong originalist bent, while not accepting the limitations of the older types of originalism espoused by Robert Bork and Justice Antonin Scalia with respect to the Constitution’s open-ended provisions like the Ninth Amendment. Napolitano finds such limitations too restricting on a judge’s ability to apply the Natural Law to decide cases where the liberty of the individual is at stake. Napolitano is a strong believer in economic liberties and argues that the decision Lochner v. New York was overruled in error in the West Cost Hotel case, as the Contracts Clause and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clauses protect a sphere of personal economic liberty.[17

Napolitano’s Natural Law jurisprudence incorporates some Living Constitutionalist decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education and Loving v. Virginia as proper expressions of the Natural Law in terms of personal autonomy and equality. While not ascribing necessarily the reasoning underlying the Supreme Court’s decisions in the area, Napolitano finds that there is a natural right to privacy.

Napolitano’s recent academic and popular work has work asserted that, similar to Randy Barnett’s presumption of liberty, there is a bias in favor of freedom incorporated into the Constitution for when courts are faced with a question of liberty versus security.

In September 2015, Napolitano was the featured speaker at a conference held by the conservative, government watch-dog group Judicial Watch.[18]


Now, there's a little bet about Judge Nap;

In the other corner, we have the eminent, well known (in his dinky hick town in Arkansas ), the one, the only, (than you, Father!) Twurdlow!

Below is Mr Twurdlow's record of accomplishment..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**************************************************************************************************************************************************##################################################################################################################<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

And there you have it, Ladies & Gentleman, libturds, trolls, and various other "progressive" TRASH!

And the WINNER clearly is.....................................................................Da Judge!

Hillary Clinton's campaign is reportedly unhappy with Hillary Clinton



There is trouble in Hillaryland: According to anonymous sources who spoke with Politico, Hillary Clinton is frustrated with her campaign staff — and vice versa. With the too-close-for-comfort win over Bernie Sanders in Iowa and a New Hampshire victory for the Vermont senator on the horizon, Clinton is reportedly looking to reassess the staff at her Brooklyn headquarters sooner rather than later.

One source who is close with both Hillary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, said, "The Clintons are not happy, and have been letting all of us know that. The idea is that we need a more forward-looking message, for the primary — but also for the general election too… There's no sense of panic, but there is an urgency to fix these problems right now."

There is dissatisfaction among Clinton's staffers, too:

Over the summer while her campaign was bogged down in the email controversy, Clinton was deeply frustrated with her own staff, and vice versa. The candidate blamed her team for not getting her out of the mess quickly, and her team blamed Clinton for being stubbornly unwilling to take the advice of campaign chairman John Podesta and others to apologize, turn over her server, and move on. The entire experience made her a deeply vulnerable frontrunner out of the gate, and underscored a lack of trust between Clinton and her operatives, many of whom were former Obama staffers that she didn't consider part of her inner circle of trust.

Her advisers were also frustrated by having to play roles they hadn't been hired for and were ill-suited for. From the beginning, [the campaign's top pollster and strategist Joel] Benenson was frustrated that he was forced to split his time between defending his boss on emails and defining a path for her candidacy. Clinton, meanwhile, longed for a chief strategist in the Mark Penn mold who could take on a more expansive role than playing pollster.




My comments;

"Over the summer while her campaign was bogged down in the email controversy"? I have bad news for these schmucks........if they think Shrillary was "bogged down" over the summer with her email fiasco, they haven't seen anything yet! I wonder what they think all of those 100 to 150 FBI agents are doing, picking their noses? The FBI has just announced publicly that it's their intention to seek an indictment of their arrogant "boss"; and Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet" at the DOJ has already been informed by the FBI that if she is "unwilling to do her job", that the "SWHTF"!




.

Hillary Is Really Pissed Off Now!


Hillary With & Without Her "False Face"?


What Hillary's Staff Put Up With Daily?

We have quite a few pileated woodpeckers where I live, we hear them "drumming" almost daily, but I'm lucky if I actually see one once a month!

For as big as they are, pileated woodpeckers have an uncanny ability for avoiding humans. Sometimes when I have a bunch of feeders in my back yard filled up with sunflower seeds, peanut butter, niger and shelled corn, it's common to have red-head wood peckers, downy wood peckers, red-belly wood peckers, and hairy wood peckers all enjoying the "hand-outs" at the same time, and on one or two rare occasions I've seen a pileated stop by, perch for maybe a minute in the very top of a big beech tree, check out all the other birds, then fly off to the woods across the road. Not once have I ever seen a pileated ever come near one of our feeders; pileated wood peckers go almost exclusively for large grubs and large insects, and they'll literally tear a dead or rotten tree to pieces to find the big juicy grubs that they like.

I have probably walked 100 miles in the woods nearby in the spring, over the last few years, hoping to find a pair of pileated wood peckers nesting; so far I've found quite a few red-heads nesting, (my 2nd favorite wood pecker), we have an eagle nest not too far away that the same pair of bald eagles nest in ever year for 15 years now, but to date, I have yet to find pileated wood peckers nesting.

Judge Nap: Hillary 'Wants to Be President, and She's A Felon'


Feb 07, 2016 // 1:04pm
As seen on Justice With Judge Jeanine
Judge Nap: Hillary Should Be More Worried About the FBI Than About Sanders





Why should the American public be concerned about Hillary Clinton’s email scandal?

Judge Andrew Napolitano pulled no punches when he gave Judge Jeanine Pirro his take on Saturday.

“Because she wants to be the president of the United States, and she’s a felon,” he said plainly.

Judge Napolitano sat down on Justice on Saturday to weigh the dangers of a potential President Hillary Clinton.

Clinton’s emails “are important, because they show the manner and methods by which the United States government acquires foreign intelligence,” he explained.

Judge Napolitano said that Clinton “has shown a cavalier attitude about preserving these secrets,” as well as the names of “people, who if their names came out, would be dead.”

This “violates an oath she took when she became Secretary of State, which violates the same federal criminal statute that was used to prosecute General Petraeus,” he said.

“She should be indicted for it.”


'A Devastating Blow to Her Credibility': Judge Nap on New Hillary Email Fallout


The State Department has deemed that 22 of Hillary Clinton’s emails are "too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances

Fox News chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge now reports this morning that the emails contain “operational intelligence” and their presence on the unsecure, personal email system jeopardized “sources, methods and lives."


Judge Andrew Napolitano discussed the new developments with Stuart Varney this morning, explaining that the latest report reveals a new twist in the scandal.

He said that up until now, the State Department has been agreeing with Clinton's repeated assertions that she never sent or received emails "marked classified."

The State Department is now disagreeing with the former secretary of state, he said.

"They're saying, 'We, the State Department, found 22 top-secret emails, highest category,'" said Napolitano.

"Not only were they top-secret, they were operational. ... They were characterizing and they were about intelligence projects that were going on as the emails were being written," he pointed out.

Clinton has recently claimed that the email scandal is similar to Benghazi, with Republicans trying to damage her politically.

But Napolitano said that there was never a team of 150 FBI agents looking into Clinton's actions with respect to Benghazi, as they are doing with her private email server.

"She has more to worry about from the FBI than she does from Bernie Sanders," he concluded.



The State Department has deemed that 22 of Hillary Clinton’s emails are "too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances





My comments;
This really must be tough watching for all of the Hildebeeste butt-kissers around here!




.

The Wear & Tear From All Those Years Of Lying?


Damn That GD F.B.I.! I Had This Sewed Up Until Those Pricks Got On My Ass!


I Did NOT Have Textual Relations With That Dog!


Hillary The Hippie?


Hillary During Slick Willie's Monica Lewinsky "Affair"?


Hillary Before This Is All Over With?


Hillary's New "Roomie"?

SF cops admit car-theft victim was wrongly turned over to ICE

Article By / Vivian Ho
February 5, 2016 Updated: February 5




Immigration attorney Zachary Nightingale (left), Mission district resident Pedro Figueroa-Zarceno (middle) and supervisor John Avalos (right) talk during a press conference concerning Pedro's immigration detention in city hall in San Francisco, California, on Friday, February 5, 2016.


San Francisco police officers handcuffed a car-theft victim, ran his name for warrants and then released him into the waiting arms of federal immigration agents, records show, in what is being investigated as a possible breach of local sanctuary-city laws.

Pedro Figueroa-Zarceno, 31, was released from jail Wednesday after two months and spoke at a news conference Friday. Afterward, Police Chief Greg Suhr acknowledged that the longtime city resident never should have ended up in the custody of immigration agents.

Police officials did not specifically admit to calling those agents, but federal officials said police had done just that.

“We are happy and relieved that Mr. Figueroa-Zarceno has been restored to his family,” said Sgt. Michael Andraychak, a police spokesman, in a statement.

“It is the policy of the San Francisco Police Department to foster trust and cooperation with all people of the city and to encourage them to communicate with SFPD officers without fear of inquiry regarding their immigration status,” Andraychak said. “We are aware of concerns this incident has raised with some members of our community.”

He said the police force had opened an internal affairs investigation to determine whether any officers should be disciplined.

Deportation order

The incident raised questions about how San Francisco authorities interact with immigration agents. The controversy flared last year after the Pier 14 killing of Kathryn Steinle by a Mexican national who was facing deportation but had been freed from San Francisco jail under the sanctuary-city laws.

Federal officials said Figueroa-Zarceno was the subject of a deportation order arising from his failure to appear at an immigration hearing in San Antonio in December 2005, and from a 2012 conviction for drunken driving.

But Figueroa-Zarceno’s attorney and San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos said the police cooperation with immigration authorities violated the city’s sanctuary-city ordinance that bars any use of money or resources to “assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law” — an ordinance designed in part to make potential crime victims and witnesses feel comfortable working with authorities regardless of their immigration status.

As San Francisco officials work to clarify policies in the wake of the Pier 14 case, immigration advocates say Figueroa-Zarceno’s detention is an example of a broken immigration system — and yet another reason why San Francisco needs to strengthen its policies.

Make policy ‘stronger’

“We want to make sure that as the sanctuary policy is politicized by what’s happening on a national level, that we can protect it and make it stronger and make sure that people like Pedro do not get impacted,” Avalos said.

Figueroa-Zarceno, a Mission District resident, had reported his car stolen in November. Then, on Dec. 2, he received word from the police that they had found it. But when he went to the Southern Police Station on Third Street to get the police report, he said he found himself in handcuffs.

According to a report from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees immigration, San Francisco police ran a routine background check on Figueroa-Zarceno and discovered that he had an outstanding warrant out for his deportation from more than 10 years ago.

Eileen Hirst, chief of staff for the San Francisco Sheriff’s Department, said police officers contacted her department’s central warrant bureau, whose job it is to confirm warrants.

She said deputies contacted the service center at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and confirmed the warrant. The deputies relayed the information to police, who had authority to decide whether to honor the warrant, Hirst said. The Homeland Security report said an ICE duty officer was informed of Figueroa-Zarceno’s whereabouts by both the service center and San Francisco police.

Back at the station, “I was handcuffed because they told me there were questions they needed to ask me, but there were no questions asked — I was simply handcuffed for about 15 minutes,” Figueroa-Zarceno said Friday.

ICE was waiting

“I was happy that they told me they were going to release me,” he said, “but once I got out of the Police Department, there was ICE outside.”

As his 8-year-old daughter screamed, “Papi! Papi!” and begged federal agents not to take him, Figueroa-Zarceno was shackled, put in a van and driven to a Contra Costa County jail where ICE houses inmates. He was released Wednesday on bail.

ICE officials said Friday that Figueroa-Zarceno is one of the “at-large foreign nationals who meet the agency’s enforcement priorities, including convicted criminals and other individuals who pose a potential threat to public safety.”

“Mr. Zarceno-Figueroa’s case is now being reviewed by the immigration courts to determine whether he has a legal basis to remain in the U.S.,” said James Schwab, an ICE spokesman, in a written statement.

Figueroa-Zarceno says he never defied immigration authorities. He came into contact with ICE shortly after he entered the country and explained he planned to file for asylum from the violence in El Salvador, said his attorney, Zachary Nightingale.

Aunt in San Francisco

He told the agents he planned to go to San Francisco, where his aunt lived, but still intended to go through the hearing process, Nightingale said. He said his client provided his aunt’s address in San Francisco, but never heard from authorities.

“That is not uncommon in my practice to see people whose cases go off the rails for reasons that are not their fault,” Nightingale said. “To me, this clearly indicates why San Francisco should not just be turning people over blindly to ICE.”

The question of whether notifying ICE of a person’s immigration status constitutes a violation of sanctuary-city laws was fiercely debated following the Pier 14 killing. A month before the suspect in that case was released, then-Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi issued a memo banning all communication with immigration agents seeking to deport jailed suspects, absent a warrant or court order.

New sheriff, new view

Newly elected Sheriff Vicki Hennessy is working to reverse that order to allow for some cooperation with federal agents in the most serious criminal cases, a move that has been criticized by advocates for immigrants.

Christine Falvey, a spokeswoman for Mayor Ed Lee, said Friday that the mayor remains “a firm supporter of the sanctuary-city policies.” After Suhr alerted him of Figueroa-Zarceno’s case, the mayor reached out to the Homeland Security secretary, she said.

“He expects the chief to fully review this case to make sure this doesn’t happen again, and the chief has assured a thorough review will happen as soon as possible,” Falvey said.

Vivian Ho is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. E-mail: vho@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @VivianHo




My comments;
Just one more example of "liberals-in-action"! Why do liberals do the stupid things they do? You would need to ask a liberal that; not being a liberal, I can only guess; my best guess is, "liberalism" is some sort of a brain dysfunction......I do know this.....liberals don't "think"......liberals "feel"......and they ALL "follow"......and who do they follow?

Now we're getting to the root of the problem.......it's never anyone with half-sense, "character", "morals", etc. etc. etc. It's generally always someone who is known to be a liar, a narcissist, a person who sees them selves as being "above" everyone else. For the last seven or so years they have all been "following" some clown who can't produce a valid birth certificate, can't prove where he went to college, or even "if" he went to college; the colleges that he was supposed to have attended have his records "sealed"; many people wonder why his records and grade transcripts are all sealed; I'm guessing that it's most likely because there ARE NO RECORDS! So far, no one has ever been able to find anyone who even remembers seeing him while he was "supposed" to be in that college. (maybe he was "invisible"? ) or more likely, maybe he wasn't even THERE? ) In either case, that's the kinds of people that liberals "follow"; Liars, narcissists, criminals, shit-heads in general, etc, etc, etc.

And San Francisco........ever wonder why a beautiful city like San Francisco has now become a third-world s***hole? Take a long close look at the three s**theads below........ and there's you answer! Any place where illegals are "immune" from the laws that everyone else has to follow will ALWAYS become a "s**thole, IMO.



.

Lawyer Zachary Nightingale, Pedro Figueroa-Zarceno, Supervisor John Avalos (

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Twurdlow............I can't imagine anyone on this whole forum who has done more to make "him" (or "her" ) self look ignorant and one-sided than YOU have! Yet you continuously attempt to convince other people (who don't happen to agree with YOUR narrow-minded, imbecilic brand of "liberalism" ), that it's them that are "lacking"........

You seriously need to find a hobby or something to "take up your time" because the more of these goofy one-liners you toss out there at normal, sensible people, the more you make yourself look like an idiot! Have you ever considered taking up needle-point? Or embroidery?
knitting perhaps?

You do seem to like playing around on your computer........I can turn you onto something that I personally get a lot of enjoyment out of that you do with a computer; have you ever given any thought about doing "fractals"? In case you don't know what fractals are, here are a few attempts to explain what they are, and I'll post a few examples below, none of which are ones that I've done, but just a few examples from the internet.

A fractal is a never-ending pattern. Fractals are infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales. They are created by repeating a simple process over and over in an ongoing feedback loop.

The term "fractal" was first used by mathematician Benoît Mandelbrot in 1975. Mandelbrot based it on the Latin fr&#257;ctusmeaning "broken" or "fractured", and used it to extend the concept of theoretical fractional dimensions to geometric patterns in nature.

A fractal is an object or quantity that displays self-similarity, in a somewhat technical sense, on all scales. The object need not exhibit exactly the same structure ...



If you should happen to become interested in creating fractals, you'll first need a small software program (which are widely available on-line )


You are very definitely NOT a "debater", twurdlow.........you simply come across as being a poorly educated and inarticulate "dumb bell"!
As a matter of fact, every time I read anything you've written, I'm always reminded of the "individual" below.......



.

Could This Possibly Be Twurdlow?


Fractal 1


Fractal 2


Fractal 3


Fractal 4

You're dead wrong about that, Soba! The only Ukrainians who voted to go back under Russia were the ones in Crimea; (which is in the lower right hand corner of Ukraine and right next to Russia when you look at a map of Ukraine. )

Obama Says Mosque With Extremist Ties Has ‘An All-American Story’

Article by CHUCK ROSS

President Obama met behind closed doors on Wednesday with 13 Muslim leaders at a Baltimore mosque with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. And, according to a White House pool report, one of the participants is the Islamic Society of Baltimore’s anti-gay resident scholar, Imam Yaseen Shaikh.

Obama’s short trip to the Islamic Society of Baltimore (ISB) marks his first visit to a U.S. mosque since taking office. After the meeting Obama spoke to congregants at the mosque, which he said “like so many in this country, is an All-American story.”

Introduced by ISB’s president, Muhammad Jameel, who in 2014 accused Israel of engaging in “genocide” against Palestine, praised the mosque for its inter-faith outreach efforts. He also praised the mosque’s school, “where teachers open young minds.”

But ISB’s schools, the Al-Rahma School and Qur’an Academy, are led by Imam Shaikh, a British citizen who formerly served as imam in Plano, Tex., who has said that Islam is adamantly opposed to homosexuality.



A 2013 YouTube video uncovered by The Daily Caller also shows Shaikh lamenting that gay rights activists have “hijacked” the political system to further their agenda. (RELATED: The US Mosque Obama Has Chosen For His First Visit Has Deep Extremist Ties)

“This whole subject of homosexuality in the public sphere…is no longer a religious issue, unfortunately, as much as we want to use the religious card and try to defeat this, now it’s become a politicized issue,” Shaikh said in the hour-long sermon.

“Politicians are highly influenced by people who back them, and we find that these politicians who are calling for gay rights and marriage and supporting gay rights are lobbied and campaigned by gay activists, by gay groups. And they are throwing money at it left and right to gain some acceptance in society, to be considered normal people, to be treated normally.”

Shaikh also warned that children must be taught that homosexuality is “not okay.”

“We have to counter the efforts that are taking place elsewhere,” Shaikh says in the video, adding that “if our children are taught that [homosexuality is] okay, we have to teach them it’s not okay.”

But ISB’s extremist ties runs deeper than its relationship with Shaikh.

The mosque is also a member of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) network. That organization has long-standing ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation terror financing case. Five executives with the Foundation were convicted of funneling money to the terrorist group Hamas, which is the Palestianian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The mosque’s imam for much of the 1980s and 1990s also has close ties to extremists and terrorist groups.

Mohammed Adam el-Sheikh was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood in Sudan, his home country, in the 1970s. He also co-founded the Muslim American Society, which is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.

While in Baltimore, el-Sheikh served as a regional director at the Islamic American Relief Agency, which the Treasury Department designated as a terrorist organization in 2004. The organization’s African arm reportedly funneled money to al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden and other terrorists.

After leaving ISB in 2003, el-Sheikh served as imam at Dar al-Hijrah in Falls Church, Va. That mosque has numerous links to terrorists and terror sympathizers. Before el-Sheikh’s tenure, Dar al-Hijrah’s imam was Anwar al-Awlaki, the al-Qaeda recruiter killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen in 2011.

In 2004, el-Sheikh defended Hamas’ use of suicide bombers against Israelis.

“If certain Muslims are to be cornered where they cannot defend themselves, except through these kinds of means, and their local religious leaders issued fatwas to permit that, then it becomes acceptable as an exceptional rule, but should not be taken as a principle,” he said in 2004, according to a Washington Post article at the time.

Another one of the 13 roundtable attendees on Wednesday has espoused extremist, anti-Israeli rhetoric.

Rami Nashashibi, the executive director of the Chicago-based Inner-City Muslim Action Network, has gone on record supporting a movement to sanction and boycott Israeli companies and scientists. During a May 2015 speech supporting that movement, known as the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement, Nashashibi asserted that Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in disputed territories is a form of “apartheid.”

Why Is Obama Giving This Mosque A Free Pass?

He's Trying To Be Politically Correct ?

He's An Idiot ?

He's Incompetent ?

All of the above ?

Obama did not address any of the issues backed by ISB officials and some of his roundtable attendees. Instead, he sought to portray Islam as a religion of peace and offered thanks to American Muslims.
“So the first thing I want to say is two words that Muslim Americans don’t hear enough — thank you,” Obama said during his speech.

He also expressed sympathy over what he said is a spike in anti-Muslim bias.

“On top of that, as Muslim Americans, you also have another concern. And that is your entire community is targeted or blamed for the violent acts of a few,” Obama said.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/03/obama-says-mosque-with-extremist-ties-has-an-all-american-story/#ixzz3zAPVkFl3




My comments;

Watch Barry from now on until he is either impeached or leaves office; he's not even trying to hide being a Muzzie any longer; I'll bet the Secret Service had a hoot, protecting the POTUS in a Mosque!

He said, “like so many in this country, is an All-American story.”

You and I have a whole different idea about what constitutes "an All-American story", Barry!

This is really rich! Muslims hate gays, stone gays, kill gays, yet ANYONE who has ever been in ANY middle-eastern country knows that a huge majority of Muslim men use young boys as sex slaves; And one can only wonder......does Imam Yaseen Shaikh know who Larry Sinclair is? Does he know that about 75% of the people in the whole U.S. think that the POS who "visited" his mosque "might be" a "fudge-packer"?

Look at that expression on Obozo's face! He looks like a little kid who just met Santa Claus!

This is really rich......the libs all love gays, they want "gay this" and "gay that", they all love to see their Country being invaded and over-run by Muslims, then here's one of their Muslim "good buddies" telling their "hero" (The Bummer ), that "homosexuality is NOT OK"!
Unbelievable!

.

Obama With Islamic Society of Baltimore’s Anti-Gay Resident Scholar, Imam Yaseen Shaikh.

Quote; "Each of those assertions is false" (says Mr. Hawaii Keenan Twit )



And your source for that lie is?


Fact: Obama has no "VALID" birth certificate

Anyone taking the trouble to read my original post can see that's a FACT! (according to a certified document analyzer) Of course some liberal twit in Hawaii doesn't believe it. ) (not many people believe liberal twits in Hawaii either! )

Fact; ALL of Obama's "alleged" school transcripts have been SEALED, at the expense of several million dollars; (could it be that he went to school on a "foreign student" grant, as many believe?

Fact: Wayne Allyn Root attended Columbia University during the same years that Obama "claims" he did, yet Root or no one else going to Columbia during this time ever saw or even "heard of" Obama during this time.

Fact: Several people who were members of a homosexual "bath-house" in Chicago DO remember Barack Obama AND Rahm Emanuel from this "establishment", but inasmuch as they have subsequently been murdered, they are no longer able to "testify"

"And his own testimony that he was born in Kenya and raised as a muslim with his uncle".

Anyone taking the trouble to read Dr. Jerome R. Corsi's excellent book, "The Obama Nation" can read all about Barry Soetoro's early life in Kenya and all of his Kenyan "relatives" to their heart's content!


Perhaps you would care to reveal YOUR "sources" Mr. Hawaii Keenan Twit ?

More recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases. "We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it," Zullo told the World Tribune. "Mr. Obama's operatives cannot discredit [Hayes]," the investigator told the news outlet. "Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm's reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases." The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.


Gitzo says;
here we have the law firm that has been defending Obozo's "eligibility cases" hiring a "certified document analyzer" to help them "back up" their contention that Barry Soetoro (alias "Baracy Obammymammy) is in fact "eligible" to be POTUS, and all of the usual libtard, knuckle-draggers are "ok" with that..........but several years later when the SAME "certified document analyzer" declares that Baracky Obammymammy's phony birth certificate is a FORGERY, all of a sudden the SAME libtard, knuckle-draggers all have their panties in a wad, and are going "nutz" over this SAME highly respected and credible certified document analyzer saying that this "birth certificate" is a very crude (and very "forged" ) document!

So......I ask you.......why is it that all of these libtard knuckle-draggers get so upset, screaming and yelling, when the FÅCTS being presented are making them look like the imbeciles that all intelligent, well-adjusted, "normal people" know them to be?

And a few more questions come to mind;

Why are all intelligent, well-adjusted, "normal people" always referred to as "right-wingers", while all libturd knuckle-draggers generally referred to as "left-wingers" ?

Answer; Because all intelligent, well-adjusted "normal people" are usually RIGHT 99% of the time, while all libturd knuckle-draggers are always feeling "left behind"!

With intelligent, "normal people" it's all about FACTS!

With liberal knuckle-draggers it's all about "feel", as in when one of their main "heros", (Slick Willy) always sticks his hand up some young girl's dress and exclaims, "feels good"!


An even better question is.........(and one I have asked a thousand time with never an answer ), why do left-wing knuckle draggers always troll forum threads started by normal people they already despise?

Answer: as noted above, they "feel" "left-behind"! They have no FACTS, nothing of SUBSTANCE to offer, so their only alternative is to "assert themselves", like little school boys saying, "MINE is bigger than YOUR'S!"




"There is something wrong with this," Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says "based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources." "In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated," he says in the report.

Investigator Douglas J. Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network reported this month that in October an affidavit was filed in a court case, under seal, that purportedly identifies the creator of the Obama birth certificate. He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an investigation of the authenticity of document. Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted "exhaustive research of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood," Hagmann said.

"Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted extensive examinations of the 'copy' that was used as the basis for the PDF document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as an 'authenticated copy' proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in the affidavit," wrote Hagmann.


Gitzo says;
Obviously none of the liberal knuckle-draggers have bothered to read this, because they already "feel" anything posted by an intelligent "normal person" MUST be "wrong", so they always can be counted on to make stupid and ignorant replies that only cause
normal people to look at them in much the way they would look at a doggie-doo-doo lying on a sidewalk!

twurdlow.......speaking of "things that don't exist".........why don't you run down to the nearest hospital and ask them to X-ray your head? (then post the X-ray film here? ) I'm pretty sure we will all see that there is NOTHING "in there"!