Gitzo Loc: Indiana

Judge Nap: Hillary 'Wants to Be President, and She's A Felon'


Feb 07, 2016 // 1:04pm
As seen on Justice With Judge Jeanine
Judge Nap: Hillary Should Be More Worried About the FBI Than About Sanders





Why should the American public be concerned about Hillary Clinton’s email scandal?

Judge Andrew Napolitano pulled no punches when he gave Judge Jeanine Pirro his take on Saturday.

“Because she wants to be the president of the United States, and she’s a felon,” he said plainly.

Judge Napolitano sat down on Justice on Saturday to weigh the dangers of a potential President Hillary Clinton.

Clinton’s emails “are important, because they show the manner and methods by which the United States government acquires foreign intelligence,” he explained.

Judge Napolitano said that Clinton “has shown a cavalier attitude about preserving these secrets,” as well as the names of “people, who if their names came out, would be dead.”

This “violates an oath she took when she became Secretary of State, which violates the same federal criminal statute that was used to prosecute General Petraeus,” he said.

“She should be indicted for it.”


'A Devastating Blow to Her Credibility': Judge Nap on New Hillary Email Fallout


The State Department has deemed that 22 of Hillary Clinton’s emails are "too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances

Fox News chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge now reports this morning that the emails contain “operational intelligence” and their presence on the unsecure, personal email system jeopardized “sources, methods and lives."


Judge Andrew Napolitano discussed the new developments with Stuart Varney this morning, explaining that the latest report reveals a new twist in the scandal.

He said that up until now, the State Department has been agreeing with Clinton's repeated assertions that she never sent or received emails "marked classified."

The State Department is now disagreeing with the former secretary of state, he said.

"They're saying, 'We, the State Department, found 22 top-secret emails, highest category,'" said Napolitano.

"Not only were they top-secret, they were operational. ... They were characterizing and they were about intelligence projects that were going on as the emails were being written," he pointed out.

Clinton has recently claimed that the email scandal is similar to Benghazi, with Republicans trying to damage her politically.

But Napolitano said that there was never a team of 150 FBI agents looking into Clinton's actions with respect to Benghazi, as they are doing with her private email server.

"She has more to worry about from the FBI than she does from Bernie Sanders," he concluded.



The State Department has deemed that 22 of Hillary Clinton’s emails are "too damaging" to national security to release under any circumstances





My comments;
This really must be tough watching for all of the Hildebeeste butt-kissers around here!




.

The Wear & Tear From All Those Years Of Lying?


Damn That GD F.B.I.! I Had This Sewed Up Until Those Pricks Got On My Ass!


I Did NOT Have Textual Relations With That Dog!


Hillary The Hippie?


Hillary During Slick Willie's Monica Lewinsky "Affair"?


Hillary Before This Is All Over With?


Hillary's New "Roomie"?

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

As one of the "Hildebeeste butt-kissers around here," I know you will allow me to reply.

First of all, I didn't even read the post, and I won't. This is why:

"Napolitano regularly substituted for television host Glenn Beck when Beck was absent from his program. After Beck announced that he would be leaving Fox News, he asked Napolitano to replace him.[8] Napolitano regularly provides legal analysis on top rated shows both Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network, such as The Kelly File, The O’Reilly Factor, Varney & Co., The Fox Report with Shepard Smith, Fox & Friends, and Special Report with Bret Baier."

I wouldn't read any post or poster who cites the dishonest Glenn Beck, master of shilling gold to old folks in their retirement, gold which was recently down $200 and ounce, and which investment undoubtedly devastated the elderly investors. Shame on him.

Further, of course I would not read anyone who's legal career depended on Fox News and its various irresponsible proponents.

But, more importantly, Judge Napolitano, who apparently claims the title honestly, has such vast chasms in his legal education and thought, that his opinions mean nothing.

Let me give an example.

"Judge Andrew Napolitano pulled no punches when he gave Judge Jeanine Pirro his take on Saturday.

“Because she wants to be the president of the United States, and she’s a felon,” he said plainly."

This is a quote from above. Verify it.

Now, here is a legal definition of "felon" from Wikipedia:

"A person convicted in a court of law of a felony crime is known as a felon or convict. In the United States, where the felony/misdemeanor distinction is still widely applied, the federal government defines a felony as a crime punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year."

Anyone reading this post KNOWS Hillary, whatever her actions and whatever the reader's judgement is, Has Never Been Convicted Of Anything!

She Is Not A Felon Or Convict!

Should not a "Judge" know this?

Does not this "Judge"--particularly a libertarian "Judge"--understand that a person in this country--anyone!--is innocent until convicted in a court of law.

This is the most fundamental concept in jurisprudence, is it not?

"Judge" Napolitano forgets this, or ignores this, as an everlasting blotch on his name and reputation, which condition attaches itself to those programs which further his views and feed on his 'knowledge.'

This character assassination is not worthy of my time reading it; others may choose for themselves.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

:hunf:

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

Hillary is a pro at character assassination, ask any woman that was stupid enough to have fooled around with Bill.

Then she plays the word game.

Only a democRAT ignores that.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

The post isn't about Hillary, but about the "judge" and gitzo's choices of whom to believe.

Checkmate Loc: Southern California

The Judge over your lying whore 100 times. Your love for Hillary tells us about how you view your own family.

bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona

You heard Madeline and Gloria, sexist sows that they are.

Well I understand Bernie said I've known a lot of women and there's a rumor going around that you Hillary are no woman!

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

How sophisticated.

You must be proud.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

What an interesting idea.

Why don't you expand on that?

Gitzo Loc: Indiana

I think you better go have your head X-rayed now, Twurdlow! Your imbecilic attempt to make Judge Andrew Napolitano look like some "schmuck" is going to be a very tough sell!


Andrew Napolitano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Judge of the New Jersey Superior Court
In office
1987–1995
Appointed by Thomas Kean

Born Andrew Peter Napolitano[1]
June 6, 1950 (age 65)
Newark, New Jersey

Alma mater Princeton University
University of Notre Dame
Occupation Judge (1987–1995)
Attorney (1975–present)
Media Personality (1998–present)
Professor of Law (1980–1981; 1989–2000; 2013–present)
Religion Roman Catholic[2]

Andrew Peter Napolitano (born June 6, 1950) is the Senior Judicial Analyst for Fox News Channel, commenting on legal news and trials, and is a syndicated columnist whose work appears in numerous publications, such as Fox News, The Washington Times, and Reason. Having served as a New Jersey Superior Court Judge, he now teaches constitutional law as a Distinguished Professor at Brooklyn Law School. Napolitano has written nine books on constitutional, legal, and political subjects.

Early life and judicial and academic career

Napolitano was born in Newark, New Jersey. He is a graduate of Princeton University and Notre Dame Law School. He was admitted to the New Jersey State Bar Association in 1975.[3] After law school, Napolitano entered private practice as a litigator. Napolitano first taught law for a brief period in 1980–1981 at Delaware Law School (then-Widener). Napolitano sat on the New Jersey bench from 1987 to 1995, becoming the state's youngest then-sitting Superior Court judge.

As a judge, Napolitano issued several notable decisions. In State v. Barcia, Napolitano found that random DWI roadblock checkpoints were unconstitutional under both the Federal and New Jersey state constitutions, and sustained a motion to suppress drug and drug paraphernalia evidence found at such a stop.[4] In the case In re K.L.F., Napolitano found that New Jersey’s Frivolous Pleading Statute could be applied against the state as well as private litigants whose claims were frivolous.[5] In Cusseaux v. Pickett, Napolitano decided that a woman who was abused and mistreated by her husband has a civil cause of action against her abuser for the resulting battered woman syndrome.[6]

He resigned his judgeship in 1995 for private practice. He later pursued a writing, teaching, and television career. He also served as an adjunct professor at Seton Hall University School of Law for 11 years from 1989–2000. Napolitano is a distinguished visiting professor at Brooklyn Law School where he teaches courses on advanced and introductory constitutional law and jurisprudence, and has begun a renewed endeavor to developing his natural law jurisprudence.

Before joining Fox as a news analyst, Napolitano was the presiding judge for the first season of Twentieth Television's syndicated court show Power of Attorney (2000–02), in which people brought small-claims disputes to a televised courtroom. Differing from similar formats, the plaintiffs and defendants were represented pro bono by famous attorneys. Napolitano departed the series after its first season.

From 2006 to 2010, Napolitano co-hosted a talk radio show on Fox News Radio with Brian Kilmeade titled Brian and the Judge. Napolitano hosted a libertarian talk show called Freedom Watch that aired daily, with new episodes on weekdays, on Fox Business Channel. Frequent guests on Freedom Watch were Congressman Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell. Napolitano has promoted the works of Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig von Mises on his program. The show originally aired once a week, every Wednesday at 2:00 p.m. on Fox News' Strategy Room.
On September 14, 2009, it became a show that aired three to four times a week. On June 12, 2010, it debuted as a weekly show on Fox Business. The show was one of several programs dropped in February 2012, when FBN revamped its entire primetime lineup.[7]

Napolitano regularly substituted for television host Glenn Beck when Beck was absent from his program. After Beck announced that he would be leaving Fox News, he asked Napolitano to replace him.[8] Napolitano regularly provides legal analysis on top rated shows both Fox News Channel and Fox Business Network, such as The Kelly File, The O’Reilly Factor, Varney & Co., The Fox Report with Shepard Smith, Fox & Friends, and Special Report with Bret Baier.

Napolitano is a well-known libertarian who is a strong advocate of constitutional protections against government encroachment on natural and legal rights, as well as a strong advocate of broad constitutional liberties themselves. Napolitano has demonstrated affinity for many libertarian thinkers, such as John Locke, Friedrich Hayek, Murray Rothbard, Robert Nozick, Randy Barnett, Ayn Rand, and Ludwig von Mises, and a broad array of libertarian ideas aimed at a minimal state aimed at the preservation of personal liberty. Napolitano is noted for stalwartly disagreeing with conservatives on questions of personal freedom, national security, and equality, while also engaging in full-throated defense of more conservative ideas of economic freedom and scope of government.

Napolitano describes himself as pro-life and holds that abortion "should be prohibited."[9] He reasons while a woman has a natural and undeniable right to privacy in her personal choices, the rule of necessity causes the right to life of the fetus, which he believes to begin at conception, to take priority for the duration of gestation. Napolitano believes the Supreme Court's ruling on inter-racial marriage in the 1967 case Loving v. Virginia set a precedent that would also require state recognition of same-sex marriage.[10] He also opposes capital punishment: "I don't believe that the state has the moral authority to execute."[11] Napolitano is also a believer in the separation of Church and State.

With respect to both Presidents Bush and Obama and their handling of civil liberties in the War on Terror, Napolitano is a strong critic. In both his recent scholarly work, appearing in the New York University Law School Journal of Law and Liberty, and in his book Suicide Pact, Napolitano delivered detailed criticisms of the actions of both Presidents and their parties with respect to torture, domestic spying, unilateral executive action, and encroachments on political power.

Two weeks after a segment on Geraldo Rivera’s program in 2010 about how the collapse of the 7 World Trade Center appeared more consistent with controlled demolition than collapse, Napolitano made comments on the Alex Jones show that have been interpreted as sympathetic to 9/11 truthers.[12] The extent to which his statements expressed sympathy with those who were skeptical of the events, finding them “hard to believe” because of Geraldo’s program, rather than acceptance of a conspiracy theory, has been a topic of debate.[13] His most extensive work on the topic of 9/11, Suicide Pact, does not express any sympathy with the position, nor have any of his public statements since.[original research?]

Napolitano believes that President Obama’s recent Executive Order on immigration is an unconstitutional use of executive power. He argues that as the president’s exercise of prosecutorial discretion is directly opposite to the will of the United States Congress, it cannot be sustained as an exercise of prosecutorial discretion pursuant to an act of Congress, but rather is an independent presidential act.

Judge Napolitano ascribes to a natural law jurisprudence that is influenced with a respect for originalist ideas and method. He has expressed strong sympathies with the Randy Barnett new originalist vein of originalism, as it incorporates the Natural Law through an original understanding of the Ninth Amendment. He has published a favorable column on Barnett’s idea of a constitutional presumption of liberty.[15] While Napolitano’s academic work as of late has tended to focus on issue-specific concerns of the Natural Law and rights,[16] he aims to more fully develop a jurisprudential theory around his conception of the demands of the Natural Law.

Napolitano’s philosophy generally has a strong originalist bent, while not accepting the limitations of the older types of originalism espoused by Robert Bork and Justice Antonin Scalia with respect to the Constitution’s open-ended provisions like the Ninth Amendment. Napolitano finds such limitations too restricting on a judge’s ability to apply the Natural Law to decide cases where the liberty of the individual is at stake. Napolitano is a strong believer in economic liberties and argues that the decision Lochner v. New York was overruled in error in the West Cost Hotel case, as the Contracts Clause and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process clauses protect a sphere of personal economic liberty.[17

Napolitano’s Natural Law jurisprudence incorporates some Living Constitutionalist decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education and Loving v. Virginia as proper expressions of the Natural Law in terms of personal autonomy and equality. While not ascribing necessarily the reasoning underlying the Supreme Court’s decisions in the area, Napolitano finds that there is a natural right to privacy.

Napolitano’s recent academic and popular work has work asserted that, similar to Randy Barnett’s presumption of liberty, there is a bias in favor of freedom incorporated into the Constitution for when courts are faced with a question of liberty versus security.

In September 2015, Napolitano was the featured speaker at a conference held by the conservative, government watch-dog group Judicial Watch.[18]


Now, there's a little bet about Judge Nap;

In the other corner, we have the eminent, well known (in his dinky hick town in Arkansas ), the one, the only, (than you, Father!) Twurdlow!

Below is Mr Twurdlow's record of accomplishment..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^**************************************************************************************************************************************************##################################################################################################################<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

And there you have it, Ladies & Gentleman, libturds, trolls, and various other "progressive" TRASH!

And the WINNER clearly is.....................................................................Da Judge!

Gitzo Loc: Indiana

Twurdlow, I have to ask you something......just a simple, "yes" or "no" will be fine!

Are you QUEER, Twurdlow? (I'll tell you later why I ask )

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

And in spite of all this, he doesn't know what a "felon" is.

Some judge.