Gitzo Loc: Indiana

Hillary Clinton's campaign is reportedly unhappy with Hillary Clinton



There is trouble in Hillaryland: According to anonymous sources who spoke with Politico, Hillary Clinton is frustrated with her campaign staff — and vice versa. With the too-close-for-comfort win over Bernie Sanders in Iowa and a New Hampshire victory for the Vermont senator on the horizon, Clinton is reportedly looking to reassess the staff at her Brooklyn headquarters sooner rather than later.

One source who is close with both Hillary and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, said, "The Clintons are not happy, and have been letting all of us know that. The idea is that we need a more forward-looking message, for the primary — but also for the general election too… There's no sense of panic, but there is an urgency to fix these problems right now."

There is dissatisfaction among Clinton's staffers, too:

Over the summer while her campaign was bogged down in the email controversy, Clinton was deeply frustrated with her own staff, and vice versa. The candidate blamed her team for not getting her out of the mess quickly, and her team blamed Clinton for being stubbornly unwilling to take the advice of campaign chairman John Podesta and others to apologize, turn over her server, and move on. The entire experience made her a deeply vulnerable frontrunner out of the gate, and underscored a lack of trust between Clinton and her operatives, many of whom were former Obama staffers that she didn't consider part of her inner circle of trust.

Her advisers were also frustrated by having to play roles they hadn't been hired for and were ill-suited for. From the beginning, [the campaign's top pollster and strategist Joel] Benenson was frustrated that he was forced to split his time between defending his boss on emails and defining a path for her candidacy. Clinton, meanwhile, longed for a chief strategist in the Mark Penn mold who could take on a more expansive role than playing pollster.




My comments;

"Over the summer while her campaign was bogged down in the email controversy"? I have bad news for these schmucks........if they think Shrillary was "bogged down" over the summer with her email fiasco, they haven't seen anything yet! I wonder what they think all of those 100 to 150 FBI agents are doing, picking their noses? The FBI has just announced publicly that it's their intention to seek an indictment of their arrogant "boss"; and Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet" at the DOJ has already been informed by the FBI that if she is "unwilling to do her job", that the "SWHTF"!




.

Hillary Is Really Pissed Off Now!


Hillary With & Without Her "False Face"?


What Hillary's Staff Put Up With Daily?

Bobbee

Love the 'False Face' Compare.

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

I read an article which stated that when you keep changing staff but get the same result, perhaps it's the product.
--Bob

sb Loc: Florida's East Coast

Yeah, reality sux...

The alternate Hillary picture is from the movie "Mars Attacks". For any of you who have not seen it - it is as funny as Hillary is not!

sb Loc: Florida's East Coast

And doesn't Hillary epitomize the old saying:

"Oh what a tangled web we weave, when at first we do deceive"..... ?

Bobbee

Yes, one of the stupidest movies that was ever made. Worth watching once. Guess that is why they used the picture as comparison!!!

It is amazing, we used to be a nation with high ethics. We never let things go. Look at Nixon, look at all the other things that went by in history. Now a days. politicians prove over and over again they are the worse lot of people. It is our fault we let them get away with it. With all the Clintons have done. They show up at a rally and people go nuts over them. Sez a lot for us. And then we turn around and complain about others. 'Two Face'!! We should all be Indians with that name.

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

that was a great movie!

Hillary's campaign should fire Hillary!

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

This story may be true, or it may not. What politician would say "Our people are doing well and we need make no improvement?"

Perhaps things are going well; perhaps they are not. The campaign has been going for months and still has almost eight months more to run.

Presumably any candidates still standing in November will be more informed, tried and tired, and will have a much sharper view of the electorate, it's problems, and remedies.

This takes on a life of its own.

But you...what about you?

"My comments;

"Over the summer while her campaign was bogged down in the email controversy"? I have bad news for these schmucks........if they think Shrillary was "bogged down" over the summer with her email fiasco, they haven't seen anything yet! I wonder what they think all of those 100 to 150 FBI agents are doing, picking their noses? The FBI has just announced publicly that it's their intention to seek an indictment of their arrogant "boss"; and Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet" at the DOJ has already been informed by the FBI that if she is "unwilling to do her job", that the "SWHTF"! "

Clearly you bring hostility to the discussion, without adding understanding.

"Schmucks?" That's about you, not Hillary. Is that the best you can bring to the discussion?

"I wonder what they think all of those 100 to 150 FBI agents are doing, picking their noses?" That's not too mature, is it?

The FBI will do what the FBI does, in its own time, and in its own way.

I can almost guarantee you Hillary will not be indicted. How can they arrest Hillary for doing what Colin Powell and Cond Rice's people did?

She sent emails in real time that were classified sometime later. Big deal.

She couldn't possibly submit those real-time documents to a classification committee beforehand.

But you stew in your moral morass, irrational and assuming--that is, hoping--for trouble.

Big wast of time, buddy.

"The FBI has just announced publicly that it's their intention to seek an indictment of their arrogant "boss";"

I have no idea who you refer to as the FBI's arrogant "boss;" it certainly can't be Hillary. She was never the head of he justice department, and isn't now.

And the FBI doesn't announce their "intentions" to seek an indictment of anyone. They just do it, or they don't.

And, who announced it?

Show me.

Only conservative half-wits predict publically what they would Love the FBI to do. We've seen several of those unknowing guys lately, predicting what they would love to see happen, without knowledge, legal precedent, and practical politics.

You are dreaming, wishing, and lusting, just for trouble, just like they.

Reality is a much better place to be.

Remember, Dick Nixon committed actual crimes, bombings, breaking and entering, etc., etc. He was never indicted, was he? That's not the way things work.

George Bush was never indicted, just shunned (and now his brother is, too).

"and Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet" at the DOJ has already been informed by the FBI that if she is "unwilling to do her job", that the "SWHTF"! "

See, "Omarxo;" that's projection again. Not what is real, but what you lust for.

"Fat ass," and "puppet," ditto.

And finally, "Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet at the DOJ" is not informed what the FBI is going to do; he permits it, if he approves. That's why he is head of the Justice Department; he tells the FBI what to do. Period.

And this threat of her being "unwilling to do her job," is rather empty. She has no job except to run for President.

Consider President Hillary Clinton addressing the FBI about their vengeance during her election campaign.

Hmmmm.

What you dream of, what lust for, what you demand...just ain't gonna happen.

This post isn't about Hillary, or the FBI, what she did or is doing, or what the FBI might do, or will announce it will do; it's about your hostility, your misunderstanding and your intransigence.

Think about it.

You'll be happier for it.

BTW, what the hell is "SWHTF"?

Opus Loc: South East Michigan

Think back 8 years ago, yes boys and girls history does repeat. In 2008 some of her staff complained that she was a deer in the headlights when things got tough and Obama started winning. Now she figures that firing staff will change things, it won't. Sanders may not beat her but it will be closer that anybody thought. Her shortcomings as a campaigner and candidate are not the fault of her staff, it's totally on her. She has neither Bill's political skill or personal appeal. The first thing she needs to do is stop yelling. Every time she yells she sounds like an insane bitch with no sincerity.

Just to be clear I wouldn't vote for her for dog catcher (she would have to arrest herself). She is everything that is wrong with politics because:

1.) She doesn't believe in anything. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

2.) She is the ultimate Wall Street whore.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

Spot on Homer! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Your best post so far this year! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

:thumbup: Exactly my thoughts - fire her.

Gitzo Loc: Indiana

Twurdlow..........

You simply can't get anything straight, can you? You can't even follow a discussion without getting everyone mixed up! If you refuse to believe that Shrillary's campaign is "going to hell" and is like a train that's "off the tracks", that's perfectly OK with me! (I really wouldn't have expected anything else from an idiot like you! Here's an idea for you; if you don't believe this story, why don't you call up a few of Shrillary's "schmucks" and ask THEM "how things are going?

You keep talking about "Dick Nixon".......may I remind you, Mr. Nixon is DEAD......has been for quite some time now.......and anything he "did" or "didn't do" has nothing what-so-ever to do with the daily crimes being committed by YOUR "hero", Shrillary Clinton! Like ALL liberals, when anyb of YOUR compatriots get caught with their hands in the cookie jar, YOU immediately start blathering about "what someone else did" many years ago! With your ridiculous line of reasoning, I suppose you must think that if you were caught robbing a bank, all you would have to do is start grumbling that "people have been robbing banks for years and years now, so I'm just "doing what everyone else is doing"!

The next time you get caught robbing a bank, I suggest you try that Twurdlow........and please be sure to let us all know how that "worked out"! BTW......your pathetic attempt to discredit Judge Andrew Napolitano........I posted many years of his accomplishments, his sterling record, has admirable and scholarly reputation, and attempted to compare it to your's..........(even though YOU don't have anything to brag about!) But you still think peoplem are going to pay attention to you when you attempt to "bad-mouth" someone with a distinguished background like Judge Napolitano has?

And you reference to "what I bring to the discussion".......may I remind you Twurdlow, I'm the one who STARTED this "discussion"! ) And I don't recall anyone inviting a half-wit such as yourself to participate! So.....if you have a problem with "what I bring to the discussion", please feel to go jump into the nearest lake! Lol! ROFLMAO! (You do know what "ROFLMAO" means don't you, Twurdlow, or do I need to explain that to you also? )

Oh.....quote; "And the FBI doesn't announce their "intentions" to seek an indictment of anyone. They just do it, or they don't.

And, who announced it?

Show me". unquote;

There was a whole news story about it Twurdlow! I'll go back and see if I can find it again and post it....(just for you! )

Quote; "And finally, "Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet at the DOJ" is not informed what the FBI is going to do; he permits it, if he approves. That's why he is head of the Justice Department; he tells the FBI what to do. Period. Unquote;

Twurdlow.......you have just demonstrated your complete and total lack of knowledge about what you are attempting to talk about! First....Omarxo's fat-ass "puppet at the DOJ" is not a "he"........his fat-ass "puppet" at the DOJ is a 4th rate black female attorney named Loretta Lynch; Second: L.L. is: The A.G. of the U.S. (That stands for "Attorney General", Turdlow; Third; you are completely "full of crap" when you say that the AG "tells" the F.B.I. "what to do"! The Federal Bureau of Investigation is quite unlike most (if not all) Federal Bureaus; it has a "Charter"......this "Charter" "tells it what to do"......and fortunately for the American people, the Director ofv the F.B.I., James Comey, is an honorable man, (quite unlike Loretta Lynch I might add), and is "doing his job" just like the F.B.I.'s Charter "instructs" him to do it!

As to "who announced it"......the F.B.I. "announced it" you idiot! I have't even had time to read the damned story yet! I'm still wasting my damned time here, attempting to "educate" a moron (named "Twurdlow! )

BTW........I asked you a direct question yesterday.....are you or are you not, queer? I have a reason for asking this....you'll be very surprised "when & if" I decide to tell you my reason for asking if you are of the "limp wrist" category.......

Gitzo Loc: Indiana

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

I love it! If she was elected to "dog catcher" she would have to arrest herself! That's the funniest thing I've heard so far this year!



.

If That's Not An Insane Bitch I've Never Seen An Insane Bitch!