Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: micro
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 73 next>>
Sep 8, 2012 10:14:28   #
sinatraman wrote:
what about the immoral abortions that have murdered over 50 million innocent children? not to mention barry trying to force catholic institutions to provide contraceptives and abortions even though it violates church beliefs. What about support gay marrage which the word of God calls an abomination. Then let us talsk about so called cuts toi the needy. Who just stole 750 millon dollars from medicare to fund obamacare when the majority of americans don't want it. Hint it is not the GOP. Who gutted the food stamp program to fund Michelles program about childhood obesity? again not the GOP. Aparently Michelle forgot about the President"s council on physical fitness. Finally we are 16 TRILLION dollars in debt, how fair is it to our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren to leave them this mess because the dems can't stop spending money they don't have. They need a 12 step program. " Hello, I am barack and I am a tax and spendaholic." 3% cut in the growth in spending is not draconian. Perhaps the nun should be more concerned with saving lost souls and bringing them to Jesus which is what they are supposed to be concentrating on. This is why the Vatican is resuming more direct supervision of the various orders of nuns.
what about the immoral abortions that have murdere... (show quote)


I don't believe she said anything to support abortion.
Why is it that some people care so much about a fetus, but don't care at all once the baby is born? So condem her for caring about the thousands of children growing up hungry?
This is not an either/or.
Go to
Sep 8, 2012 10:06:27   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
LOL Dems say that there is no such thing as voter fraud, but here we have a clear case of it and there have been many others, a couple of weeks ago I posted footage of a local Florida NBC station going to the homes of non us citizens in south florida who have voted in statewide elections where they confronted those illegal voters.... it is happening no matter what the message that the left would like to get out disputing that fact. it would not have prevented it in this case of absentee ballots, but it will prevent it in the 100'000's of thousands of cases of voter fraud taking place in polling sites across the country... This was not just anybody in this case, this was a NAACP executive, it shows the not only the willingness but also the sense of entitlement to commit such fraud.... This person knows better but it did not matter, both she and her organization have little to no respect for the sanctity of the franchise.
LOL Dems say that there is no such thing as voter ... (show quote)


Actually it is the Republicans who are so clearly trying to steal the election with votr superssion.
The most likely voter fraud can be perpetrated via absentee voting. Republicans do nothing for that because the believe that the military votes Rrpublican.

The least likely fraud comes from early voting, Republican Govenors are restricting early voting because Dems are more likely to vote early.

On site voter fraud is still unproven (admitted even by those defending it in court), but the requirement is most likely to effect the elderly and poor, Democratic leaning demographics.

Republican voter supression, win at any cost, has never been clearer.
Go to
Sep 7, 2012 23:24:06   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Reprint...

A Mississippi NAACP executive is in jail after being convicted of voter fraud for fraudulently casting absentee ballots, including for four dead people.

Lessadolla Sowers, who is a member of the Tunica County NAACP Executive Committee, was convicted and sentenced in April for what a judge said were crimes that cut “against the fabric of our free society.”

She was given a five-year sentence for each of the ten counts of voter fraud for which she was convicted, but the sentencing judge allowed her to serve the terms concurrently, according to the Tunica Times.
Reprint... br br A Mississippi NAACP executive is... (show quote)


You're mixing apples and oranges. Voter ID would do nothing to protect against absentee fraud.
What I (and most) have repeatedly said is that there is virtually no "on site fraud that voter ID would effect.
Go to
Sep 7, 2012 23:13:49   #
SteveR wrote:
admitting that God is against the Democratic platform.

A Democratic Christian....beginning to fall into the ranks of the oxymoron.


You may not have watched, but a Nun spoke at the convention, regrding the immoral cuts (for the the needy), that would result from the Ryan budget.
Go to
Sep 3, 2012 23:19:34   #
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Aug 31, 2012 18:33:32   #
I do like it :thumbup:
Go to
Aug 31, 2012 18:25:10   #
:thumbup: Nice ans sharp.
"no blur in those eyes"
Go to
Aug 29, 2012 21:21:12   #
The third one is a Buckeye.
Nice work.
Go to
Aug 29, 2012 16:37:45   #
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
FRENCHY wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (show quote)


Please define socialist and capitalism . It is not a trick question ,just want your opinions on this
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (show quote)


To start with I meant to say "I don't avocate communism any more that I advocate pure capitalism.

The defination of commusism, socialism and capitalism can easily be looked up, so I won't cut and paste.
What I mean by these terms are:
Communism - the government owns everything, no class structure, everyone equal.
Capitalism - private enterprise, rewarded for initiative and success.
Socialism - socal saftey net to educate our children, build infrastructure, protect citizens, care for the unfortunate.
Pure Capitalism - Corporation uncontrolled by regulations. Motivated by profit, uncaring, no conciece, no soul, no FDA, no EPA, corporate CEOs decide what is best. To me the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by "near" Pure Capitalism. This is the resurgance of Ayn Rand philosphy of individualism - take care of yourself, be successful, others are on their own.
Just MHO
quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=T... (show quote)


Micro,
Now you have really stepped in it! First of all, in a Communist System not everyone is equal. That is the big lie they preach. The Communist Leaders have everything and the people are all equally poor. Don't you remember what the world found when the USSR crumbled? Everything outside the cities was Third World or less.

Now I am sure you would like us all to believe that the evil banks are in bed with the Republican Party. I hate to ruin your day, but the banks have been bankrolling the Democratic Party for some time now. As for the 2008 Crash, who was controlling the purse strings of this Country? A totally Democratic controlled House and Senate. Who was it who changed the banking rules before GW Bush took office, so that people who could not and should not be able to qualify for a home mortgage got one? Clinton! The Attorney General under President Clinton even threatened Bank of America with a federal law suit, if they didn't comply with the new rules. I'm not making this stuff up guys. Do your own investigation. The Democratic Party and the big banks brought our economy down and Bush got the blame. Pretty good, if you can get away with it!
quote=micro quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gm... (show quote)


I steped in nothing (certainly not your not-so-clever trap), Communism in theory and Communism in practice are very different. Just as cipatilism in practice vs theory, etc. Only children believe there can be pure communism, capitalism, democracy.....
Both parties are beholden to their corporate contributors/owners. But if you have any level of consciousness you would know that a consistant objective of the Republican platform is deregulation (ie small government), except of course when it comes to peoples private lives. Democrats are traditionall for regulation of the boardroom not the bedroom.
You can believe that Bush did not let corporations run wild without any government oversight, as you can believe the earth is flat.
Now go try to fool me into another trap (I do admit I answered upon the assumption is that you were an honest person askng an honest question. Wrong on both counts.)
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=FRENCHY quote=... (show quote)


Do you people ever have a response that wasn't written for you by some political hack? I love how when you run out of intelligent things to say, you start with the insults to my intelligence. Which, by the way, I will put against anyone. I have been putting out information from my personal experience, on a subject that I know a lot about. I can't expect a Liberal/Progressive to understand or respect my position on anything. What is most dangerous about you people is that you are all for freedom of speech, as long as the person speaking is saying things you agree with. When they do not you call them Racists, Right Wing Nuts, morons, or what ever sounds more demeaning at the time. I'm through with you. As I said before. You wouldn't know a "fact" you didn't agree with, if it bit you in the ass. You also don't seem to understand what an anecdote really is.
quote=micro quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=FR... (show quote)


Just who is "you people"? I don't have to call you names, you mke it quite clear, who you are.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=ThomasS quote=... (show quote)


Third line down.
quote=micro quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Th... (show quote)


So you aparently think you know all about liberals, and all liberals are the same. How very simplistic.
Go to
Aug 29, 2012 14:22:11   #
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
FRENCHY wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.

Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.


Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?


Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.


Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.

Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (show quote)


Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (show quote)


Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (show quote)


Please define socialist and capitalism . It is not a trick question ,just want your opinions on this
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (show quote)


To start with I meant to say "I don't avocate communism any more that I advocate pure capitalism.

The defination of commusism, socialism and capitalism can easily be looked up, so I won't cut and paste.
What I mean by these terms are:
Communism - the government owns everything, no class structure, everyone equal.
Capitalism - private enterprise, rewarded for initiative and success.
Socialism - socal saftey net to educate our children, build infrastructure, protect citizens, care for the unfortunate.
Pure Capitalism - Corporation uncontrolled by regulations. Motivated by profit, uncaring, no conciece, no soul, no FDA, no EPA, corporate CEOs decide what is best. To me the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by "near" Pure Capitalism. This is the resurgance of Ayn Rand philosphy of individualism - take care of yourself, be successful, others are on their own.
Just MHO
quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=T... (show quote)


Micro,
Now you have really stepped in it! First of all, in a Communist System not everyone is equal. That is the big lie they preach. The Communist Leaders have everything and the people are all equally poor. Don't you remember what the world found when the USSR crumbled? Everything outside the cities was Third World or less.

Now I am sure you would like us all to believe that the evil banks are in bed with the Republican Party. I hate to ruin your day, but the banks have been bankrolling the Democratic Party for some time now. As for the 2008 Crash, who was controlling the purse strings of this Country? A totally Democratic controlled House and Senate. Who was it who changed the banking rules before GW Bush took office, so that people who could not and should not be able to qualify for a home mortgage got one? Clinton! The Attorney General under President Clinton even threatened Bank of America with a federal law suit, if they didn't comply with the new rules. I'm not making this stuff up guys. Do your own investigation. The Democratic Party and the big banks brought our economy down and Bush got the blame. Pretty good, if you can get away with it!
quote=micro quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gm... (show quote)


I steped in nothing (certainly not your not-so-clever trap), Communism in theory and Communism in practice are very different. Just as cipatilism in practice vs theory, etc. Only children believe there can be pure communism, capitalism, democracy.....
Both parties are beholden to their corporate contributors/owners. But if you have any level of consciousness you would know that a consistant objective of the Republican platform is deregulation (ie small government), except of course when it comes to peoples private lives. Democrats are traditionall for regulation of the boardroom not the bedroom.
You can believe that Bush did not let corporations run wild without any government oversight, as you can believe the earth is flat.
Now go try to fool me into another trap (I do admit I answered upon the assumption is that you were an honest person askng an honest question. Wrong on both counts.)
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=FRENCHY quote=... (show quote)


Do you people ever have a response that wasn't written for you by some political hack? I love how when you run out of intelligent things to say, you start with the insults to my intelligence. Which, by the way, I will put against anyone. I have been putting out information from my personal experience, on a subject that I know a lot about. I can't expect a Liberal/Progressive to understand or respect my position on anything. What is most dangerous about you people is that you are all for freedom of speech, as long as the person speaking is saying things you agree with. When they do not you call them Racists, Right Wing Nuts, morons, or what ever sounds more demeaning at the time. I'm through with you. As I said before. You wouldn't know a "fact" you didn't agree with, if it bit you in the ass. You also don't seem to understand what an anecdote really is.
quote=micro quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=FR... (show quote)


Just who is "you people"? I don't have to call you names, you mke it quite clear, who you are.
Go to
Aug 29, 2012 09:30:47   #
jkaye65 wrote:
You are so delusional. Ever heard the quote "use it or loose it"? If you don't start thinking for yourself you are gonna "loose" you mind. Your brain will be what your on-screen name already is.

Who the hell cares whatever ad you referenced. I don't even need to go to it. Top democrates were on TV saying Romney was responsible for the ladies death. Another liberal lie!


micro wrote:
BigBear wrote:
micro wrote:
Drigby1 wrote:
But Mitt Romney had nothing to do with it. He had left Bain, she lost her other insurance, but her husband's insurance did kick in. So the story meant to harm Mitt Romney is false, the incident of the cancer is true, but Mitt Romney cannot be held accountable. Why the story? Because the Obama camp cannot stand on it's 4 years. They have been the worst of any presidency. He shoots out lying blaming stories to keep the focus off of the real issues.
If you have read any of the releases of stories of Mitt Romney, true ones, then you would know this is a man that serves and helps others: Reference- when he was with Bain he shut down the company for a day and had everyone look for an employee's missing daughter. Please quit listening to Obama's lies, and look at the issues. Thank you.
But Mitt Romney had nothing to do with it. He had ... (show quote)


The ad never blamed Mitt Romney.
Every fact mentioned, was true. If Romney wins and congress repeals the Affordable Healthcare Act, many more will die.
quote=Drigby1 But Mitt Romney had nothing to do w... (show quote)


I really find it hard to understand how you can be so warped in your thinking and what you perceive to be true.
quote=micro quote=Drigby1 But Mitt Romney had no... (show quote)


Please, google the ad, it mentions Baine (which is true) and never mentiones Romney. He also lost his health insurance. If they lived in any other western country they would have access to affordable healthcare. That is what the Republican party wants to undo in the U.S. That is warped!


Now for warped, Romney says to a group ni Michigan, "nobody has to ask for my birth cirtificate to know I was born right here....."
quote=BigBear quote=micro quote=Drigby1 But Mit... (show quote)
You are so delusional. Ever heard the quote "... (show quote)


So disagreeing with you is not thinking for oneself.
I think you have a very arrogent perspective!
Go to
Aug 29, 2012 09:25:55   #
gmcase wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
micro wrote:
So here is what you are asking. First you "cut and paste" an exhaustive list of rediculous claims, with no proof or evidence, and you want others to spend the time to disprove all of them. I'm retired and I wont waste my time. Here is what I ask of you, please... Reread the list and tell me that you believe the charges. Mrs Obama has 200 servants, dog trainer on retainer.....
Please think about it.


I didn't post it Sherlock. Rixprick said none of it was fact and was only opinion. I asked for citations that show the claims are untrue and are only opinions.
quote=micro So here is what you are asking. Firs... (show quote)


Well Einstein, when one makes acqusations against someone, they should bare the burdon of proof.
Why sould anyone waste their time providing you with facts when you refuse to do your own research.
quote=gmcase quote=micro So here is what you are... (show quote)


Sherlock, come on now. Someone made assertions and I asked for proof. How am I being unreasonable? He said nothing on the list were facts, only opinions. I find broad statements usually are false so I asked for citations. If he wants to spout off false assertions then fine but others should be aware of it. Nothing more, nothing less. If he can,t back up his assertions then don't make them. Shouldn't free thinkers support such a position?
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=micro So here is... (show quote)


No Einstien, someone asked for proof of the origional assertions. You aparently decided that a charge has to be disproved even though there is no proof to support the charges.
quote=gmcase quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=mi... (show quote)


He didn't ask for proof of the original assertions but he made an additional assertion they weren't factual but only opinions. I asked for some proof/citations they were only opinions and not factual. I made no assertions. He did and I only asked for some proof like any free thinker would insist on when broad generalizations are made. No?
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=micro quote=gmc... (show quote)


Then you and I agree that both the origional posting and the charges that you note are unfounded without evidence.
We can move on.
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 23:10:17   #
Thanks :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 22:54:43   #
I would find that funny, if it didn't bring back so many bad memories :lol:
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 22:48:31   #
Count me in!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 73 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.