FRENCHY wrote:
micro wrote:
gmcase wrote:
ThomasS wrote:
micro wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
RMM wrote:
Hal81 wrote:
I can not and will not respect a man that lies through his teeth to the american people. He only gets the respect thats due him. None. I respect the office not the man in it.
Then don't expect any respect for your opinions. And don't expect anyone to pay any attention to you.
Wow! you speak for all or just for the libs?
Noone speaks for all liberals. Liberals are free thinkers.
Hal I'm afraid you are "beating a dead horse." They actually do not understand. Perhaps they are new here and just don't understand why this country was so successful in the first place. They don't understand how bad Government Policies can take away a person's desire to work and better themselves. There are generations of people out there who have never held down a job for more than a few weeks. It's not totally their fault. They have fallen into the slavery trap of our screwed up welfare system. When you can make more money not working than you can working, it is human nature to sit on your butt. At least it is for some people. These same groups of people are often heavily into drugs and alcohol (because they are bored) and this leads to crime. I see it every week, when I handle my criminal case load. It is depressing to see people in their 40's who have never held down a job and even more depressing when you read their family background and find that their mothers and fathers (who often weren't married to each other) didn't work either. These people have been failed by The System. Why does this continue? Because these folks are a guaranteed vote for a "special" group of people. The Founding Fathers knew this could become a problem and even wrote about it.
Are you aware that some of our earliest colonies actually tried a form of Communism? The experiments failed rather badly and that is why we haven't tried it since. You can find this information in the Library of Congress. It now appears some people in this country want to try Socialism or Communism again, even though it has failed everywhere it has been tried. Look at the USSR, Europe, Asia. Even the Communist rulers in China have had to embrace a form of Capitalism to survive. The funny thing is that these are the people who call the "rest of us" stupid, uninformed, brain dead, etc, when they are the ones who can't read and understand a damn history book.
quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RMM quote=Hal81 ... (
show quote)
Well said.
quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=Hal81 quote=RM... (
show quote)
Communism is no more effective that pure capitalism.
This is typical of life, extreme positions are seldom effective.
How do you define socialism - Social Security?, National Healthcare?, Police Department?, Federal Highway System?
Mititary Draft? Fire Department?........
I'm a liberal, I don't advocate socialism, nor pure capitalism.
quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=micro quote=H... (
show quote)
Please define socialist and capitalism . It is not a trick question ,just want your opinions on this
quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=ThomasS quote=m... (
show quote)
To start with I meant to say "I don't avocate
communism any more that I advocate pure capitalism.
The defination of commusism, socialism and capitalism can easily be looked up, so I won't cut and paste.
What I mean by these terms are:
Communism - the government owns everything, no class structure, everyone equal.
Capitalism - private enterprise, rewarded for initiative and success.
Socialism - socal saftey net to educate our children, build infrastructure, protect citizens, care for the unfortunate.
Pure Capitalism - Corporation uncontrolled by regulations. Motivated by profit, uncaring, no conciece, no soul, no FDA, no EPA, corporate CEOs decide what is best. To me the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by "near" Pure Capitalism. This is the resurgance of Ayn Rand philosphy of individualism - take care of yourself, be successful, others are on their own.
Just MHO
quote=FRENCHY quote=micro quote=gmcase quote=T... (