It’s most definitively NOT a brown recluse.
Thanks. This was (is) my first Father’s Day away from my kids. Currently in the Denver Airport waiting for the last leg of my flight.
Best wishes to all of the fathers out there.
Peterff wrote:
If you wish to make political comments, Comey isn't the top. Another individual holds that position. Perhaps we should keep politics to the attic.
Agree. But since the reference has been made it’s the SOBOTUS....
AndyH wrote:
More importantly, you CANNOT create the polarizer effect in PP. If detail is lost behind reflections, it's just not there for resurrection. Not even Lazarus could bring back that which does not exist.
Andy
FWIW, Lazarus brought back nothing. He was he who was brought back from the dead, according to the story.
But I agree on the point you were making...
I believe it was called “focus lock”.
I really like the composition of 5his one. Can you click “store original” so I can examine more closely?
Thanks, allen
The Garden Spider on the web is excellent. Love the designs in there.
Any of the choices. Really depends on the purpose.
Any of the choices. Really depends on the purpose.
Steve Perry wrote:
I actually did a video all about them - answers all your questions and more - plus lots of demos:
https://backcountrygallery.com/how-to-use-a-polarizing-filter/
Thanks, Steve. Another fine tutorial. It never hurts to review things you think you know.
BebuLamar wrote:
When someone ask a question and I answered the question. I asked the OP whether he would answer a couple of questions without first saying which questions the OP put me on the ignore list.
I know this thread will be moved to the attic where nobody read. But I try.
Some posters want an answer—even if it’s not what they were asking.
Kuzano wrote:
Fujifilm firmware is beyond excellent. It has allowed me to avoid upgrade purchases because before a new model comes out, firmware often has the preceding model matched to the next upgrade.
One example is that those looking for the Fujifilm X-E2s are only paying more money for an X-E2 with all the firmware updates to either 4.10 (or 4.11).
The X-E2 really has NO substantial feature advantage over the X-E2, yet is selling for more money. I am currently using An X-E2 with latest firmware and see not advantage to change up until I get the 24MP XT20, or the new budget 24mp Bayer XT100 at $699 w/new focal length zoom.
If it weren't for the 24MP, I'd probably still keep shooting the latest firmware X-E2. The next most aggressive firmware update MFR is Olympus in my experience. My second choice MFR.
Fujifilm firmware is beyond excellent. It has allo... (
show quote)
Maybe. I basically got mine for the cost of the lens. But I d agree: other camera makers release a new model; Fuji does a firmware upgrade which is free. They know customer service.
Well I’m breaking the “rules” here, because I’m not a Canon user, so here goes (from the rule breaker):
First of all the link to DPReview with their side-by-side comparison:
https://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=canon_eos200d&products=canon_eos800d&products=canon_eos77d
The differences I noticed, some of which are small:
SL2 has 9 AF points, the other two have 45.
SL2 shoots 5 FPS, the other two 6.
SL2 has a battery life of 650, the other two rated at 600
SL2 comes in at 453 grams, the T7i @ 532 and the 77D @ 540
SL2 @ $549; T7i @ $749; 77D @ $899. These prices are likely to vary... but should be somewhat comparative
None of these are noted as environmentally sealed.
Happy brown trucking....
Photocraig wrote:
Old School Bricks and Mortar has its advantages. A camera in had is worth more than an Upgrade on a brown truck!
Not only that, but prices are much the same. I always buy local when they have what I’m looking for which is almost always