For you are shooting film, color positive or color negative? Why?
Color positive (as well as lots of b&w) - at this time it seems less expensive than slides and more widely available.
Positive, for the saturation.
rjaywallace wrote:
Color positive (as well as lots of b&w) - at this time it seems less expensive than slides and more widely available.
Isn't slide film a positive?
AndyH
Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
Positive (slide) film. As Longshadow said, for the saturation. I also think that transparency film scans into digital better than negative film, but that's just personal opinion. I'm looking forward to the return of Ektachrome.
Andy
I don't do B&W because I am a bad B&W photographer. I used to shoot color negative film because I had a full color darkroom. Since I bought my DSLR I got rid of the darkroom so now when I shoot film I shoot slides.
safeman wrote:
For you are shooting film, color positive or color negative? Why?
Prints (negative film). I dont' shoot slide film because: (1) I do not have a slide projector anymore; (2) Digital and the computer/HDTV have replaced the slide projector; (3) Modern processing labs offer great scanned products; (4) slide film has a narrower exposure latitude than negative film. Slide film is similar to digital imaging in that respect. So I just shoot digital instead.
I use positive film for negatives the saturation is perfect and can make an excellent print.
Leicaflex wrote:
I use positive film for negatives the saturation is perfect and can make an excellent print.
What film, what chemistry?
I generally shoot black and white because the process of developing and printing is less hassle (and much faster). If I DO shoot color, then it's negatives. I can process both color and black and white but I'm lazy so I generally stick with black and white unless there is a good reason not to.
I have a darkroom set up for both but because I use an Analyzer for exposure (Analyzer Pro) I can go in, put the neg in the enlarger, take a reading of the light with the analyzer, and make a print that's dead on and be done; no test prints, no monkeying around with 10 sheets of paper to get a print.
Interestingly enough, it's cheaper to shoot color.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
safeman wrote:
For you are shooting film, color positive or color negative? Why?
When I shot film I shot both, depending on the situation. Negative color film was more forgiving on exposure than color slide film. BUT, color slide film gave me a different color rendering than color negative film. If I was going to do a lot of post work in my darkroom I wanted to work with color negative film because I could do more with it than slide film. But that's just me. You may fine the opposite true.
safeman wrote:
For you are shooting film, color positive or color negative? Why?
I only shoot B&W on film. I have never taken the color out of one of my digitals to make it a B&W, because there is a difference between a silver oxide paper print and an ink jet B&W. An ink jet cannot reproduce the silver metalic black, it is flat, no depth.
Slides (positive) only. Best saturation, shows my mistakes better thus helping me learn more/faster, like the challenge of the narrower exposure latitude.
safeman wrote:
For you are shooting film, color positive or color negative? Why?
Neither. B&W negative and mostly digital color.
But I occasionally use color negative, especially for medium format. It has more resolution than small format digital. Medium format has the advantage of a larger "sensor" size. Negative film has more latitude and plenty of highlight capacity.
Saturation has nothing to do with whether you shoot positive or negative film. That is determined by how you process it after you scan it - where you map the colors during post processing.
Any of the choices. Really depends on the purpose.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.