Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: elandel
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 37 next>>
Dec 29, 2014 13:16:41   #
Boney wrote:
Could be a burn on one of your shutter curtains, but didnt burn thoroughly. Check to see if it worsens with the mirror up and lots of light. In fact remove the lens to see if you can see it when the mirror is up, MUP command.


If this is true, how can it happen?
Go to
Dec 29, 2014 13:07:17   #
Hi all, I just saw there is a problem with my D7100. There is a circle in the mid of the photos. I'll post a sample here. It is very evident when there is a bright backgound.
In there first you can see it in the second it seems 'hidden' by the background.

Can anyone tell me what it could be? I think it is sensor problem. I bought it used with one year guarantee.




Go to
Dec 28, 2014 17:52:55   #
jmizera wrote:
The RX100 is more of a point and shoot camera. No doubt very good for what it is designed to do. The Canon is a mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses. The a6000 would be the counterpart in the current Sony line.


Thanks
Go to
Dec 28, 2014 13:13:56   #
jmizera wrote:
I have an EOS M with the 22mm lens, as well as an EF-S adapter. I've shot images and video that looks as good, and possibly better than a Rebel DSLR. I bought mine after the price cut, and it did fall short of the Sony competiton at the original price. Even after a BIOS update, the focus is still a tad on the slow side. For the going price now, I think it's well worth it.

I actually use this camera primarily to shoot video. I have Magic Lantern installed, which adds some pretty cool features.
I have an EOS M with the 22mm lens, as well as an ... (show quote)


Thanks. Do you think it could be a substitute of the Sony RX100?
Go to
Dec 27, 2014 13:32:44   #
Hi all.
I am thinking about buying a Canon M because prices dropped dramacillay here in Italy. I have a special offer of a Canon M+22mm+flash+adapter for 199 euro new. The price is really tempting but I read that there are some issues and quirks on this camera.
I use a sony RX100 for compact portable camera but not very much. I only use it on holidays as a light travel camera when I don't bring around my E-P5 or D7100.

Can anybody who owns the too make a comparison or give some feedback on IQ and handling for the Canon?

Do you think it can be a viable alternative to the Sony?

Thanks
Go to
Dec 26, 2014 05:18:55   #
Had the for D700 for a year or so. Sold it for the D600 which was a real failure. sold the D600 and still regretting not having my D700.
Go to
Dec 26, 2014 03:32:31   #
Like most say the D750 is a superb all-rounder and one of the best buys.
Go to
Dec 25, 2014 16:34:12   #
Dana C wrote:
I would go for the D7000. It has become affordable and can be bought new for a tad over $600.
I have one and haven't been bothered by over exposure. I use Light Room and Photo Shop to adjust almost all my pictures to what I think looks best anyway. The D7000 is a great value and you can't go wrong with it. I would not buy a camera without an internal focus motor. The 5000 series are great camera but for me have the fatal flaw of no motor. There are a ton of great used or refurbished lenses that will work on the D7000 but not on any of the D3000-D5000 series.
I would go for the D7000. It has become affordabl... (show quote)


Also for me no internal focus motor is a major flaw.
Go to
Dec 25, 2014 13:01:59   #
I'd go for the D7000/7100. Had the same decisin and went for the D71000.
Awesome.
Go to
Dec 8, 2014 11:28:42   #
Forgot to mention there are walkarounds but you loose af. Is it fine for you?
Go to
Dec 8, 2014 11:26:56   #
Like said above you must consider the system. If you need long zooms I think dslr is the way to go but if you can live with max. 210mm focal length then A6000 is a very capable camera. I had the same dile mma and went for the Nikon D7100 because I often shoot at 300mm. So its all up to your needs and style.
Go to
Dec 8, 2014 05:50:37   #
A6000 vs D3300? No contest. A6000.

They are really in two categories. One is entry level other is mid-level.
Go to
Dec 7, 2014 14:54:19   #
I had the same dilemma and went D7100. Why? Because the number of photos I shoot now cannot justify the price of a FF system.
Is the 7100 good enough for me? Well yes, more than good enough.
If I had much money to spend maybe I would have gone FF and maybe someday I'll go, but I'm perfectly happy with my D7100.

Maybe you can make another choice. Only you can tell.
Go to
Nov 17, 2014 14:32:48   #
Dave R. wrote:
Yep....Me thinks you're reading much...
LOL


Me too.LOL
Go to
Nov 9, 2014 14:22:59   #
Bill Houghton wrote:
Yes there is a big difference in the RAW file if you at the Best setting. But that is due to the increase in 16.2 meg sensor to the 24 meg senor. The advantages or the larger senor size gives you more depth in your photos, and the ability to crop your photos tighter.

I use a D40X which has 10 meg sensor, allowing limited cropping. I also use the D5300 which has the 24 meg sensor and there is no comparison between the two. I would go for the newer D7100 since I'm spending your money. LOL
Yes there is a big difference in the RAW file if y... (show quote)


:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :D :D
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 37 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.