Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: timcc
Page: <<prev 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 next>>
Jan 24, 2018 09:38:39   #
I expect that my photos in hard drive and cloud backup will disappear into the ether before my grandchildren ever see them.

I periodically print my favorites in Shutterfly albums, all duly labeled. I have also kept our photo Christmas cards from over the years. Assuming some offspring have an interest at some point down the road, those two will be ready hard-copy sources.

In going through the collections of various ancestors, the only photos my siblings and I kept were those in which the people and places were clearly identified (or identifiable, in which case we labeled them).

I am taking my lesson from that experience - knowing that someone felt that a picture merited being saved, but being frustrated at not having any idea of who or what we were looking at. In which case the photo is lost forever.
Go to
Jan 23, 2018 10:36:07   #
Gene51 wrote:
I am a Lightroom/Photoshop user. I have used PS since 1998. However, one of the simplest, fastest image editors I've come across in a long time is Capture One Pro v11. If you shoot raw, it is even better, but it will work with jpeg files - the editing process is exactly the same. It provides excellent results with it's automatic settings for exposure, shadow, highlight, contrast, brightness etc. One button to set those parameters. It takes a little bit to get it set up and understand it's logic, but once you spend a couple of days learning it, you will be able to process your images to a better level of quality than just about anything else.

I recently became reacquainted with it when I purchased a Sony RX10 MIV - which provided an "Express" version of the software. I was getting better results with the limited Express version than my "go to" PS/Lr. You can add handwritten notes, or a text overlay.

Here is a quick example of the overlay approach with an older version - https://blog.phaseone.com/composition-overlay-with-capture-one-pro-7/

The big advantage is that you can shoot raw files which can be adjusted for better results than a jpeg, without giving it a second thought.

You can download a trial from Phase One - https://www.phaseone.com/en/Download.aspx?gclid=CjwKCAiA15vTBRAHEiwA7Snfcxv_1K4axKtceMMCgTtqhin5OoKEJLHs-0JM1xAeRm4naJ1LdbZhwRoCaDUQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

They offer a choice of perpetual license for $300, and period upgrades typically cost $120, or you can pay a $20 monthly fee for all updates and upgrades. Over a three year period, Capture One will be upgraded twice, for a total cost of $540, and the monthly plan will cost you $720, making the perpetual license cheaper to purchase.
I am a Lightroom/Photoshop user. I have used PS si... (show quote)


I've been using Capture One Pro for several years, and it's great PP software. The initial learning curve is a little steep if you are new to PP, but probably no worse than any other comprehensive program. There are lots of free webinars and YouTube videos that make learning easy.

If you shoot with Sony, the express version and periodic updates are free, and the Pro version and its annual upgrades are eminently affordable.
Go to
Jan 21, 2018 13:41:26   #
👍👍Very nice!
Go to
Jan 10, 2018 18:21:36   #
For studio work, no filter is probably necessary.

For outside work, the hood is your best protection against most types of physical damage. But in some environments (dust, strong winds, salt spray, beach sand, rain, etc.) a UV or clear lens makes sense for additional protection if you're not using a polarizer or ND filter.

If you get a UV or clear lens, get a good one from Hoya, B&W, etc. Unless you are an extreme pixel peeper, you will not notice any degradation in your images as long as you keep the filter clean.
Go to
Jan 10, 2018 17:28:21   #
connievloutely wrote:
I am thinking of taking the inside passage cruise in Alaska.

I have no idea where to start in planning this adventure.

I do know I want to come back with wildlife and landscape pictures.

I have the equipment just need to know which cruise line is best. I mean value for the money spent.

Want to leave from Seattle, WA.


As mentioned in previous posts, if you can afford a small ship cruise, you will probably get a lot more out of the trip. Lindblad National Geographic cruises usually carry 50-60 people, offer great land and Zodiac excursions, and like other small ships, can quickly maneuver into small ports or to get closer to wildlife spotted on shore or in the water.

Nat Geo ships always have certified photo instructors on board, and they will lead special excursions for photographers that hit the most photogenic sites, provide constructive advice, and let you take the time to get the shot you want.

Besides a good telephoto lens, I suggest you invest in a lightweight rain suit (jacket and pants). We went in early June, which had excellent weather but was too early to see the bears fishing for salmon.

Have a great trip!
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 11:05:54   #
Go to
Jan 9, 2018 11:01:08   #
current wrote:
This image was taken at a nearby river that I often fish. My favorite go to camera is the Canon 5D mark III that has a decent tripod glued to it - so to speak. On this particular day, it was safe at home. I carry my Iphone on the off chance I land a fish, take its picture and release it.
The time of day was at sunrise. I came across this delapidated farm equipment overlooking a section of water flooded by the morning sun. With a burst of shots I took this with the phone and later edited it using Snapseed - a free download. I was reminded it's not always about the equipment we use but the scene we capture.
This image was taken at a nearby river that I ofte... (show quote)


Have you been talking to my wife? She scoffs at the time I take to make a shot, while she quickly clicks off a picture with her Galaxy S-8 and moves on. I try for a rebuttal, but her smartphone takes excellent photos -- sometimes better than mine (though I think I have more fun). I have partially caved, buying a Pixel 2 to replace a dying Samsung. It is supposed to have the best smartphone camera (at the moment), and the mantra here is that the best camera is the one you have with you. Nice shot, and welcome to the forum!
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 18:46:35   #
If you're not planning to take a photo tour, be sure to use a local guide for the parks, as another poster has suggested. In our case, in Arenal Volcano and Manuel Antonio national parks, the guides spotted wildlife that we never would have seen in the dense foliage. They know where the sloth was yesterday (and is likely to still be there today!), they were in touch with other guides by radio and shared current sightings, and if your spouse carries a smartphone, as mine did, some guides have telephoto spotters that a cellphone can be connected to for great closeups. Other good locations in Costa Rica are Puerto Jimenez (where we saw hundreds of dolphins performing off the coast), the mangroves of Bahia Drake (lots of monkeys and colorful birds), the Tarcoles River for the large groups of big crocodiles, La Fortuna (a town spared by the massive Arenal volcano blast in 1968), and treetop zip-lining wherever you can find it (we did it in Alajuela). Have a great trip -- lots of fantastic opportunities for photos! Just carry a telephoto lens, and avoid the rainy season.
Go to
Jan 8, 2018 18:25:19   #
With that budget, you'll need to buy refurbished if you go with a DSLR, and then try to get fast-enough lenses (used) for your indoor sports. As others have suggested, the Sony a6000 is an excellent alternative. You can get the body (new) for well under $500, and spend the rest of your budget on quality lenses. Even less-expensive used/refurbished a6000s are more available now that Sony has come out with the a6300 and a6500 models. They are light-weight and great for traveling -- just make sure you carry an extra battery. Either way -- DSLR or mirrorless -- you'd be wise to focus on getting the best lenses you can afford.
Go to
Jan 6, 2018 14:16:31   #
LittleRed wrote:
It appears to me that the B&H ad contradicts itself. As shown in the copy of the ad posted by MT in the main body of the said ad (at the very bottom) B&H says "The item is in pristine condition and INCLUDES THE MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY". One would presume from this statement it would be the Nikon company one.
However, in the area that shows what is included "in the box" B&H shows something a tad different, this being the lens comes with only a LIMITED 1 YEAR B&H WARRANTY. Doesn't add up, does it😵.
I think that possibly B&H made an error in their posting of this ad and that the last line in the main body of the ad should have been omitted. It appears this ad is for a USA-Nikon lens and not a grey market one. Remove this one line and it would fit the description of grey market.😜
However, saying all that, if the purchaser would have read all the ad the fact that 2 different warranties are shown in the ad should have raised a red flag. A further investigation by contacting B&H would have been advisable in order to clear up the problem. When making any online purchase one MUST read everything posted on the item to make sure you are getting exactly what you want. If all does not appear to be kosher, then one MUST seek further information. But, at the same time the seller has to make sure what is selling is advertised correctly, something that B&H in this case IMHO they failed to do.

LittleRed (Ron)
It appears to me that the B&H ad contradicts i... (show quote)


I agree. It sounds as if there was lack of diligence by both parties: B&H misrepresented the deal by stating that the purchase "includes the manufacturer's warranty" (probably inadvertently) and the OP failed to read the ad carefully enough to spot the contradiction and ask about it. Both made mistakes, and I think it is sad to see some on this forum try to rip apart one or the other with unnecessary nastiness.

My experience with B&H over the years has been consistently good, and I believe they are about as honest as retailers come. That said, I also think they could have been more explicit in this case. "Open box" often means new but has been on display, as opposed to "used." In that case, it may be fair to expect a manufacturer's warranty to stand. Again, I suspect they made an honest mistake in preparing the ad.

I would also add that contrary to some of those who have attacked the OP, it has been a useful post and thread for most of us. A good reminder of what to ask vendors when making such purchases, and a mostly thoughtful discussion on the pros and cons of buying gray market products.
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 11:56:43   #
kinde wrote:
Would this set up work with a Sony a6300 and a Sony 100-400 mm lens?


It should, but for most travel you would need a 100-400 mm lens only infrequently. I shoot about 95% of my travel images in the 16-70 mm range, and about 3% with a 12 mm prime (inside cathedrals and other buildings, wide-angle landscapes, etc.). Most street scenes require wider angles than 100 mm, the exception being discrete close-ups of people from a distance. The telephoto is also useful for compressing landscapes, but I am more inclined to use the 16-70 at its long end. Unless you are shooting a lot in the 300-400 mm range or in low-light conditions, Sony's in-lens stabilization, a slightly higher ISO if a higher shutter speed is needed, and a steady hand should suffice.
Go to
Jan 2, 2018 10:49:32   #
Maybe better photographers than I can glean all they want to know from simply looking at an image, and I am fine with that. I prefer to see the EXIF data, not as the end-all and be-all source of information but as a clue that can stimulate my thinking on how to take various photos, such as low-light. I've noticed that one of the first things UHHers look at when analyzing a photo posted on this forum is the EXIF data, which can be instructive even if it does not tell the whole story, i.e., it does not inform us how an image was post-processed.
Go to
Jan 2, 2018 10:07:01   #
It's the usual trade-off: weight/size vs. capacity. The NP-FW-50 battery used in the a7R2 and a6xxx series doesn't last for a full-day shoot or a busy day of travel in cold weather, but it is light and small, so carrying an extra battery or two in your pocket or bag is an easy solution. A bigger battery would be more convenient, but also add weight to a camera that we bought, at least in part, for its relatively small size and light weight.
Go to
Dec 29, 2017 23:34:07   #
Corsica fox wrote:
Generally happy with a Sony RX 10 for travel but with kids the write speed/cycle time misses the moment for the perfect smile/gesture too often. Wondering if the A 6000 + series would correct/improve that. I used my Nikon D610 with pop up at Christmas and it was a chore and distraction. Thanks.


Not sure that I understand your question, but if you are having a buffer issue, the a6500 has a buffer sufficient to handle quite a few shots (the number depending on whether you're shooting JPEG or RAW) on continuous shooting. This means virtually no delay between shots, so you'd likely get the momentary smile/gesture, especially if you set the continuous shooting mode on medium or high speed. The a6000 also handles multiple shots well, but has a smaller buffer. Not sure where the a6300 stands.
Go to
Dec 29, 2017 22:14:58   #
Nice concise summary, Elmo.

Elmo wrote:
This will be presumptuous, especially for a newcomer here, but I couldn't help but sympathize with Bill in his desire for a brief, useful introduction to shooting "manual,:" so I thought I'd try writing one. It is below. It goes without saying that I shall be deeply grateful for any corrections and/or additions all the talent here may have:

How to shoot on “manual:”

1. Light comes in packets called “photons.” The more photons that fall on a camera’s sensor, the brighter the image is. If too few photons fall on the sensor, the image is too dark, and we say it is “underexposed.” If too many photons fall on the sensor, the image is too light, and we say it is “overexposed.”

2. When you double the number of photons falling on a camera’s sensor, we say you have increased the exposure by one stop. When you halve the number of photons falling on the sensor, we say you have decreased the exposure by one stop. A one stop change in exposure makes a noticeable difference in the brightness of the image, but it does not double or halve the brightness. Indeed, you usually have a usable image if your exposure is within one stop of the optimum.

3. The sensitivity of the sensor in a camera is governed by the “ISO” setting. Setting the ISO for a low number means it will take more light (more photons) to produce a usable image; setting it for a high number means it will take less light to produce that image. Very high ISO settings, however, are prone to produce noise, so should be avoided unless there is a compelling reason to us them. For most everyday photography, an ISO setting of 200 should be adequate.

4. Once the ISO of the sensor is established, the camera has two controls that determine the brightness of the image: aperture and shutter speed. When you shoot on “P” the camera’s computer adjusts both of these controls to yield a usable image. When you shoot on “M” you adjust the controls manually. When is it to your advantage to do so? There are many circumstances when “M” is best, but perhaps the most common are these: a) your subject is moving rapidly and you need a fast shutter speed to “stop” it, and b) you want to control the “depth of field” (the zone of sharp focus) in your image, and you do this by adjusting the aperture: a large opening (low f-number) produces a shallow field of sharp focus; a small opening (high f-number) produces a deep field of sharp focus.

5. In practice, then, when shooting in the “M” mode, having chosen the ISO you might then choose a trial shutter speed and aperture (f-number) and check the exposure. If the exposure is too low, you can increase it either by reducing the shutter speed or increasing the aperture (by selecting a lower f-number). You continue making these adjustments until your exposure meter tells you you have a suitable exposure. In adjusting shutter speed and aperture, NOTE THAT halving the shutter speed increases exposure by one stop, and doubling the shutter speed decreases exposure by one stop. Similarly with aperture: exposure decreases by one stop when you decrease aperture from f1.0 to f1.4 and from there to f2.0, then f2.8, then f4.0, then f5.6 then f8.0, then f11.0, then f16.0, then f22.0, and then f32.0 (see https://binged.it/2DwwSJ3).
This will be presumptuous, especially for a newcom... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.