Posts for: whitewolfowner
Nov 10, 2017 01:53:01 #
The Watcher wrote:
Over the past year I've found the daily digest in my spam folder a number of times. Why they ends up there is beyond me. I just transfer them to my main file and move on. Haven't missed a day.
Yes, and that is exactly my point. No other site works this way. It's like we are punished liked kindergarten children because an email ended up in spam. And, as you see, I'm not the only one this is happening to. It's not something I'm doing, but yahoo mail is doing and I get the corner for it. I'm not a child and resent being treated like one. It's that simple and to top it off, what is being done is wrong.
Nov 10, 2017 01:49:47 #
SteveR wrote:
Having read this I now understand what is happenin... (show quote)
It does not work that way; go back and read my post.
Nov 10, 2017 01:49:04 #
speters wrote:
Never happened to me yet, but I absolutely understand your frustration and I agree with you, if that is in fact how that is handled it should stop!
Thank you. Someone who actually read my post. And yes, that is the way it works. I got cut off October 20 and still am being blocked. I've sent two notices to the admin already.
Nov 10, 2017 01:47:28 #
G Brown wrote:
You get emails from UHH?
I just go online to UHH, my log in is automated ands everything works fine.
Perhaps I did not tick the box for emails OR I used a now defunct email that is crammed with the damn things.
Just search for the site and log in ...when your browser asks if you want to save your log in details click yes....end of problem
Have fun
I just go online to UHH, my log in is automated ands everything works fine.
Perhaps I did not tick the box for emails OR I used a now defunct email that is crammed with the damn things.
Just search for the site and log in ...when your browser asks if you want to save your log in details click yes....end of problem
Have fun
Nope, not the case. You, must be on a windows machine; my mac does not have that option either.
Nov 10, 2017 01:46:11 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
If that's the case, I have Yahoo email, and the only way I can see something would go to spam instead of the trash is if you hit the "spam" button instead of the "delete" button. The buttons are right next to each other. I have never hit "delete" and had the item go to spam.
Consider yourself lucky; it has happened to me at least three times.
Nov 10, 2017 01:45:21 #
SteveR wrote:
Having read this I now understand what is happenin... (show quote)
Again, go back and read; you are coming from fantasy land.
Nov 10, 2017 01:44:26 #
MT Shooter wrote:
So, you want some cheese to go with that whine? After more than 6 years here its never happened to me, sounds like you are causing your own issues here.
Again, another who can't read.
Nov 10, 2017 01:43:56 #
JohnSwanda wrote:
Have you put UHH's e-mail in your contacts? That will usually keep stuff out of spam. i use Yahoo and I've never had one of their e-mails go to spam.
I'm on a mac, not a windows machine and yahoo has nothing of the kind on my email.
Nov 10, 2017 01:40:45 #
mikeroetex wrote:
Oh please, only someone extremely naive thinks that a recommended list is a mantra. My sports car manual "recommends" only premium, high octane gasoline. That doesn't mean it won't run just fine on regular. Can I notice a bit of difference ion pickup between fuels? Sure... if i jam the accelerator to the floor. But normal everyday use, imperceptible change. Same with "recommended" lenses. Unless of course you think BMW has pulled the automobile scam of the century!
Compare your gas mileage between the premium and regular. My point here is that there is more than one side to a story, and yes, it's not naiveness, it's new people trying to learn and seeing that list and falling for the bull. That is the people I am alerting. Some people have budgets and spending money on camera gear is a serious venture for them and they take a long time saving the money for it. NOt like so many here who order something new every day to satisfy their.....who knows what....
Nov 10, 2017 01:31:59 #
mleuck wrote:
If you fall for Nikon's "marketing" tactics, you are a fool! I use many of Nikon's past great lenses (on D810) with outstanding results. Historically, autofocus (though a great option) was a tactic to get people to "upgrade" Many of my manual focus Ai-s lenses are far, far better than today's "high tech" plastic lenses.
Don't be a sheeple and be get fooled by "marketing" !
Don't be a sheeple and be get fooled by "marketing" !
Finally, another person that knows the line up and the truth.
Nov 10, 2017 01:30:25 #
RWR wrote:
I might have added that I’ve not seen where Nikon has said that any lens not on their list would not also be satisfactory. Undoubtedly there are many older Nikkors and third party lenses perfectly suited for use on the D850.
I might have added that I’ve not seen where Nikon has said that any lens not on their list would not also be satisfactory. Undoubtedly there are many older Nikkors and third party lenses perfectly suited for use on the D850.And that is my point exactly.
Nov 10, 2017 01:29:41 #
Festus wrote:
I agree with you David. It is a moronic rant! Whitewolfowner has no idea what he is talking about! Both Nikon and Thom Hogan are "suggesting the best lenses for the Nikon D850". They're listing lenses that are technically better than other Nikkor lenses. Neither one is saying that other Nikkor lenses will not work.
This is where you are wrong. There dozens of older lenses that are better than some of those listed. I'll bet the list is made up of the ones that are most backed up in stock.
Nov 10, 2017 01:25:55 #
Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
I could be wrong, but I think it would be fairly s... (show quote)
You haven't been on this forum long, have you?
Nov 10, 2017 01:24:14 #
Jim Bob wrote:
I think you are overreacting and skewing the facts. Take a step back, re-focus and come again.
I'm posting a warning to those who could be taken in by this bull and spend a fortune when they didn't have to in most cases.
Nov 10, 2017 01:22:47 #
Gene51 wrote:
You can use any lens you want with a D850, that is... (show quote)
I don't feel scammed; I see it to be the BS it is. Seems I didn't get that point across. And I know the good lenses from the not so good to the crap. Yes, lately, compared to what they always put out, they are making crap lenses now.