Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: pithydoug
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 224 next>>
Jan 24, 2024 10:01:43   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Free offers are nice, if they are actually free. Luminar is offering some subscription plans free for a short time. I'm not taking advantage of this because I don't want to be tempted to continue and have to pay every month. Also, these Gen features rely on the Luminar computers to do the processing. How many million users can they handle at once?

My processing is for me and me alone. I don't need exotic features that cost me money every month. Afterall, I'm a "Photographer." My pictures are good SOOC. 😂
Free offers are nice, if they are actually free. ... (show quote)


almsot all products that charge, tease one with a free entry. As you know, many get used to the product and tend to stay with it.

If you're satified SOOC, fine. That means 8 bit .jpg fulfills all your needs. You are satisfied with the camera doing all the editing and producing the jpg. In a way that is not SOOC but an edited file with the camera's propritarty program to produce a .jpg. For many others of us, we prefer raw and the 14 bits of data and edit to to what we want. This means pulling the lint out of our pocket to purchase an edit program.

Don't let your over frugal purse strings cloud your judgement. The $10 a month I pay for LR/PS has paid for itself times 10 in quality and sales. Remember you can't take it with you! Shake the lint out. :)
Go to
Jan 24, 2024 09:41:36   #
batchld75 wrote:
What is the difference in saving an image as tiff or jpeg? I generally capture RAW images, copy, and adjust with various software tools, then I have the option to save in different formats.


You save what you immediately plan to do with the picture. You leave it edited and export what you need and then toss it.
Go to
Jan 24, 2024 09:37:11   #
burkphoto wrote:
Taking responsibility for what we buy and use is, apparently, a controversial concept. Over the ten years or so I've been on UHH, and the 50 years of my "aware" life before that, I've noticed that a large number of people seem to gloss over the fact that technology is complex. They buy things that they think they want, but they don't do their research in advance, to be sure that THEY and their new devices, are compatible with what they want to do. They yank them out of the box, plug them in, turn them on, and get disappointed.

"Ready? FIRE!! (Uh, Aim, maybe? You just took out the neighbor's flower pot…)"

We're living in an age where our technical tools are not like hammers and screwdrivers, which are easily mastered by third graders. When you buy a hammer or screwdriver, it doesn't come with a manual, because it doesn't need one. It has a fairly singular purpose and a well-known and understood method of use. But technical gear — cameras, audio, video, computers, and cars — is different. These and many other tools and toys require serious consideration before buying, and serious study before use… IF we are going to get our money's worth from them.

Those of us who write user guides and technical manuals for products and software are usually the first to test the usability and viability of the product. If even the smallest detail doesn't work for us, we explain the issues we find to the product development team AND their directors. Making operation EASY for the customer IS HARD WORK for developers, engineers, and product design staff. It's just as difficult for trainers and training content developers.

One of the unfortunate assumptions companies make about their products is that customers WILL READ the documentation that explains proper use and care. Yet surveys have shown that up to 78% of customers never read it. Many users don't want anything to do with an 830+ page camera manual, or even any sort of a 20 page "Quick Start" guide.

I get all of that, but I also know from hiring many people in a photo lab — and from training school portrait photographers, office staff, and sales people — that understanding and mastering technology requires some quality time, focus, and a certain level of detail orientation. Patience with the documentation and with the entire learning process is usually rewarded with great results and long, trouble-free product life.

There is an old acronym that floated around the Internet BEFORE 1993, when the World Wide Web was born: 'R.T.F.M.' When users got stuck, and posted questions on a bulletin board forum for the tech support staff, the POLITE response was often, "Well, did you read the manual?" Soon enough, that got shortened to the acronym.

"Read The *Fine* Manual!" is the polite version of the acronym. After the tenth or eleventh call from the same user, with the same question, the tech support person would hang up the phone after a call, and yell into a paper bag, substituting whatever 'F' word suited his/her mood.

So here's my simple request to the universe of tech purchasers. Please read the documentation that comes with your purchase, or that you can download from the manufacturer's website at no additional cost. You will learn things you can do with your device that you never thought possible. You will avoid pitfalls that cause 80% of the issues people have with their devices. You will get more done, in less time, with better outcomes! You will trust the maker of the product more, because you understand what they do and don't expect you to do with their devices.

ESPECIALLY if you have used another brand of product in the same class, you need to read the manual just to UNLEARN how your old device of another brand worked. Don't expect brand L to work like brand N. Don't expect brand F to work like brand T. Terminology may be different, control placement may be different, and the way some of the functions work almost certainly will be different.

Don't try to make a Ford drive like a Toyota. It will just annoy you. Don't try to make a Windows PC work like a Mac. It will just frustrate you. They are different brands with different design philosophies and result from different ways of thinking about the same tasks. Take them for what they ARE, not for what they are not.

A little reading won't kill you. Operation may not be obvious, even when you think it should be. There's a reason for everything, and you need to know what it is, if you are going to get along with your new device. Read the freaking manual, and get your money's worth.
Taking responsibility for what we buy and use is, ... (show quote)


As with all your posts well said!!!!
Go to
Jan 18, 2024 09:30:21   #
scoundrel wrote:
I doubt that many hedgehogs use the cameras in their cell phones more than occasionally or in photographic emergencies where they don't have their main gear with them. If you are an exception to this rule, I want to hear from you. I don't even have a modern cell phone; just a clamshell phone that has a camera that I never used, even for a test shot.

Cell phones these days can produce decent enough image quality for casual work, such as family events and holidays. That said, how often do you use your cell phone in this way as opposed to a dedicated camera (if any)?

How controllable are its settings and which does it have: manual shutter speed, aperture, ISO sensitivity, white balance? Does it have scene modes and, if so, do you use them? Does it have a capture mode other than JPEG? Some have more than one lens. About what angle of coverage does your camera have for each? (Don't forget to specify long dimension, short dimension, or diagonal.) Does your phone have on-camera flash? If so, can you disable it? How is your camera's performance in dim light (How low can you go?) What is your flash's range, if you have one?

Does your phone have a photographic feature that you are especially proud of? That you wish it had but doesn't? That you use a lot?

Describe your favorite technique(s) for holding your phone steady when long exposures are expected.
I doubt that many hedgehogs use the cameras in the... (show quote)


There is a local pro that specializes in iPhones. Offers trips and classes just like those with SLR/Mirroeless, etc. There is market out there.
Go to
Jan 16, 2024 16:00:09   #
bigruckus wrote:
I am fairly new at this site and am just curious as to whether or not there is a section for unaltered shots with maybe the exception of cropping? Thanks.


Every shot is altered bar none unless you still have Kodac brownie.

Those thinking that shooting diital in .JPG is unaltered(aka SOOC) is simply false. Every digital camera presents each photo in .JPG whcih has been run through a propriety translator meaning ALTERED. Raw is just a bunch of data unreadable unless and unless changed to jpg, png, tiff ,xzy.

Unaltered, I.e. simply means your camera's translator with your settings. Not sure what that even translates to in quality. Ideal light will get you a better photo in general, but who the heck always has perfect light, whatever perfect light is?

Thank you but I'll pass.
Go to
Jan 16, 2024 15:41:20   #
Longshadow wrote:
The question was prompted by a comment in another thread.

INSTRUCTIONS: Post only ONE WORD: "RAW"; "JPEG"; or "BOTH".
No dissertations, no explanations as to why, no opinions, no recommendations,...
no matter how badly you feel you have to.

ANY response other than ONE of the three words will not be tallied.


RAW
Go to
Jan 14, 2024 09:01:22   #
MrBob wrote:
After being involved in a recent Math Puzzle regarding " Order Of Operations " it occurred to me that I should reevaluate my order of operations in editing a RAW file... A simple google gave me this list in order from top to bottom... What do you all think ? Maybe I have been doing things backwards ?

The new recommended order will be:
1. AI Denoise.
2. Content-Aware Remove/Heal/Spot.
3. Lens Profile Corrections (CA & Lens Profile if available)
4. Transform Panel.
5. Crop.
6. Profile.
7. Global Adjustments.
8. Local Adjustments.
After being involved in a recent Math Puzzle regar... (show quote)


I'd reverse 7 and 8
Go to
Jan 13, 2024 17:57:26   #


Mine has been great!
Go to
Dec 22, 2023 08:10:46   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I propose we invent a UHH convention to avoid confusion.

When the author (OP or reply) means the locally installed 'classic' software, just say "classic".

When the author (OP or reply) means the browser based software, just say "cloud".


How confusing would it be for those using the cloud version yet not using the cloud. :) Adobe seems to have a naming issue that keeps biting them in the ass. Would have called it LRL for lightroom lite. It is a subset
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 09:50:34   #
globetrekker wrote:
Just upgraded to LR Classic and would like to learn more about its features and improve my skills. I'll probably by Scott Kelby's Lightroom Classic Book. I have used his LR5 book for years and liked it. What other LR books would folks recommend?


Youtube is loaded with tutorials and free. Look for Morganti or Kelby or Kost etc. I'm a big morganti fan. Here is a link to his videos. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLllFqBuTM0WJTD4rpvf748Um9MMmbo4r9
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 09:45:59   #
fredpnm wrote:
Congratulation! Adobe has made it confusing, the difference between Lightroom and Lightroom Classic. Not smart marketing if you ask me, but they didn't ask me.

Further, they just made it even more confusing by letting Lightroom work on the local computer (without a catalog) instead of just on the Cloud.

Happy Post-Processing!!


I don't understand the direction or better yet, what they are trying to solve with light room. If thy are trying back away rom the cloud, tell the customer to get LRc and get more function to boot!
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 09:40:18   #
Ellen101 wrote:
I was upset that first she acused me of taking a "bad" "ugly" photo of her. She has not let me even speak to her.
I am 76 and have a few lines on my face...so what ...a part of being human. I am going to try to let this go i not history.
I thank everyone here for their support.


That is her battle with aging and vanity. If she wants to look younger suggest botox and call you when ironing is complete.
Go to
Dec 20, 2023 09:31:07   #
imagemeister wrote:
Another good reason NOT to shoot raw .....


Surely you meant to add a smiley face. Stay with 8 bit jpg files so you can use and antique tool. Do you have indoor plumbing? :) :) Once you take raw files and learn to appreciate the rich color spectrum available, you never go back.
Go to
Dec 14, 2023 19:27:19   #
lrm wrote:
After several years of good performance, my LRC is now crashing several times every day (past two weeks). Adobe agent conversations have not helped. After two hours of chat with an agent, NADA. He had me make adjustments to my computer graphics card which he thought was the problem. Needless to say, it didn't work. Also, I get a message from Adobe every crash, saying an error has occured, send my contact info, and they will be back to me.
Have never heard back. I am ready to switch to another program, but hate the idea of learning a new system. Any suggestions?
After several years of good performance, my LRC is... (show quote)


Don't blame the software on what my be your hardware or or a bad install.
Go to
Dec 14, 2023 19:25:20   #
Architect1776 wrote:
I got this photo of my grandfather, sitting on right, taken in Mexico where he grew up.
My cousin didn't do too well copying it.
For those who have developed amazing skills with PS is there a way to remove the reflection of light in the bottom corner?
I tried with PSE but I can't fix it.
PS the revolver he is holding I got from my father.
Thx


Generative fill in PS will handle a little. Two quick and dirties,the second run through NIK


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 224 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.