Only one recommendation... try out friends' tripods (or shop a store) to determine what head (ball or pan), and what type of leg release ("twist the leg" release or "flip a lever") you prefer working with before you make any decisions about a specific brand, model, or even quality.
I had an old aluminum tripod I bought 40 years ago. It had only a 1/4" head mount, and a pan head, with flip lever release for the legs. Last year I decided it wasn't good enough for my new digital pursuits. So, I paid several hundred dollars for a good (not great) carbon fiber tripod with a ball head and twist release legs. Several other nice features, too (taller, lighter, can disconnect & use one leg as a mono-pod, center column is reversible to shoot macro with it upside down, etc). I like the ball head, and the other features, but I absolutely hate the twist off legs to the extend that I really want to replace it for that reason alone. Had I been smart enough to do what I said above before jumping on what I though was a good deal, I would never have gotten the one I did--my stupidity--so learn from it.
People only fear giving up private information to the government. They don't realize that their biggest TRUE risk to their privacy is their own self contentedness, and that driving their rampant participation in social media, not from the government (which is still flawed, for sure, but many checks & balances at all levels).
The title should not influence the decision on whether or not it is a good photograph. Photos entered in competition should have titles, but the title should not be known to the judges until after the judging. (Just my two cents.)
Edgar Allen Poe house....
I've bought a couple of Avanquest products. Each one is specialized, and do what they say, but I haven't tried this specific one. Usually, if you get on their list, you'll eventually get a discounted price offer in e-mail. I wouldn't pay up for ANY of their products. To do so, you'd end up paying a feww hundred dollars to build a set of capabilities you can get in a full featured editor (PS, PS Elements, Luminar, Paint Shop Pro, etc.) Usually, if you have a fully capable editor, the sharpen function that will probably work as well. If not, then go with the version of this rjaywallace mentioned on eBay.
mrjcall wrote:
As an ex Navy Combat Photographer (CombatCamGruLant) out of Norfolk Naval Air Station in the 60s, I am saddened to see the demise of these elite photography groups in the Navy….. I suppose this kind of move is symptomatic of cutbacks in the military in general even though our current administration is pushing to increase funding. 😰 Most of our photographic history of wars was recorded by these guys..... There's a link to the article in 'Links and Resources' forum.
And yet they still have bands!
Dziadzi wrote:
I respectfully recommend that you consider the program, Quicken as an alternative to the aforementioned other two as far as ease of use and price point.
FYI... Quicken is now subscription only (and pricey at that) unless you buy an old version.
Wasn't that Miss Muffet? Or did the spider eat her, and Jack Horner "horned" (pun intended) in on her curds & whey after he finished his Christmas pie?
Nice shot regardless!
Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
You need to think about the Depth of Field you need or want. A DOF calculator app can help greatly with that understanding. ... See the example at 20 feet from my DOF calculator.
Todd Ferguson
Todd,
What is the name of the app you use? Available for Android, iOS, both?
Thanks!
traderjohn wrote:
... What are some the things you got "duped" into paying more for??
Adobe subscriptions, Microsoft Office subscriptions, Quicken subscriptions... Wow!! I think I'm seeing a trend here.
Why care about the math? If you want to keep it simple, then think of it this way... It's an SLR (digital or not). What you see through the view finder is what you get!