Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jrushphoto
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Jul 15, 2015 07:53:21   #
Yes, a perfect 90 degree angle......and a beautiful family as well! Cherish them and take all the photos you can of these special moments. Nice capture of this little angel.
Go to
Jul 6, 2015 17:40:21   #
nat wrote:
Thank you. Good advice. I'm interested in shooting water (ocean, rocks, piers) and getting that real smooth effect. Will look into the stepdown rings.


You want to get step-"up" rings. Get the filter to fit your largest lens and use the step-up rings to go from your smaller lenses "up" to the size of the filter.
Go to
Jul 1, 2015 11:50:25   #
Great stuff, Erv. Makes me look forward even more for the trip my wife are taking out there in late September. Part of our 40th anniversary summer, first time going there. Well done.
Go to
Jun 22, 2015 14:09:22   #
Great shots! Going there myself in mid-July with my wife as part a 40th anniversary trip! Hope I can match your results.
Go to
Jun 22, 2015 07:45:46   #
18-250.
Go to
Jun 22, 2015 07:45:46   #
18-250.
Go to
Jun 20, 2015 07:52:27   #
Check out some of the cloud services like Dropbox, OneDrive, or Google drive. They sound like what you are looking for.
Go to
Jun 14, 2015 17:47:24   #
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2408207,00.asp
Go to
May 20, 2015 12:08:41   #
Beautiful shot. Well done.
Go to
May 20, 2015 12:08:00   #
Beautiful shot. Well done.
Go to
May 20, 2015 11:19:41   #
billnourse wrote:
Looking at this bracket to keep the flash centered above the lens when in both landscape and portrait modes. Any one use this or have thoughts?
http://www.custombrackets.com/products/camera-flash-brackets/cb-folding-sa.html

Thanks,

Bill


Custom Brackets are excellent. I would seriously suggest checking out their RF-PRO model. Its more expensive, but WELL, WELL worth it. I can almost guarantee you will never want for any other type. I would recommend it to anyone, anytime. Check it out and you can contact me anytime if you have any questions about how I use it.
Go to
May 16, 2015 13:22:01   #
Mogul wrote:
I really am sorry! I made the comment in a moment of irritation and regretted it later. But I do have a problem with the manner in which the OP asked the question; too curt and impatient. Oh, and when I interpret the acronym, I substitute a much less offensive word, often "forgotten" instead of the gutter language. My apologies to the OP and the other members of the forum.


If I have any type of philosophy in life it is that the measure of a man is not the mistakes he makes (because we ALL make them) but what he does about them. Kudos to you, Mogul, for stepping up. Well done.
Go to
May 16, 2015 07:19:12   #
Mogul wrote:
Welcome to the Hog.

I always get in trouble when I say this, but I'll get it out of the way early. No offense intended, but RTFM. Then you can ask specific questions and will receive good answers from a great number of very knowledgeable people.


RTFM. Really? Grow up. How can that be anything but offensive? Your response would have actually been helpful without that.
Go to
Apr 24, 2015 09:56:11   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
It wouldn't be impossible with just a raw file. The raw file contains a preview which is equivalent to a straight out of the camera jpg. There are programs that will extract the jpg with minimal time investment. The jpg is a basic quality jpg, not the best thing if you want prints, but adequate for a slide show. I assume you have to do a little editing anyway to eliminate duplicates and real duds.

However, memory is cheap, so raw+jpg is still probably the easiest way to do it.


Understood. I use a VERY old Panasonic Toughbook laptop to run the shows and it doesn't even have a raw editing program installed so there isn't any way for it recognize the raw info. I have, from time to time, looked into other ways but I do the slideshow just as a little extra for my clients ( I don't even tell them I'm going to do it, I surprise them with it, almost always a big hit!). Since I'm doing fewer and fewer weddings these days, there is no really good reason to change what has worked for so long. Always looking, though, so thank you very much for the observation, I had forgotten about the embedded preview, maybe I'll try looking into it again.
Go to
Apr 24, 2015 07:16:32   #
Bill Houghton wrote:


Hands down the absolutely best, easiest to understand explanation of the advantages of the raw file. Without question the JPEG format is extremely useful and should never be dismissed ( I always shoot both at my weddings because I run a slideshow at the reception showing the images we've done from the day up to the start of the reception which would be impossible with just a raw file ). I, too, enjoy the post processing aspect of my photography just as I did with darkroom work in my film days, but I freely admit that today's cameras do a very, very respectable job of producing a final, or almost final, image in most cases. Thanks for posting this link, Bill, I have it bookmarked, it's a keeper.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.