Both. Lens shade, and appropriate filter.
Nope. You're not the only one. Been a print subscriber for years. I think the magazine continues to get better.
3 deceptively simple words. Quality (equipment), Age, and Experience.
Hope that was your wife's toothbrush and not yours....
And you and I are in the same boat!
Mirrorless. Please buy the new Olympus OM 1 ii and send it to me.... Please????
Couldn't agree more! I have a 7DII and a 5III with the usual 70-200 2.8 and 2X extender, and 25-85. BUT!!! Getting older and the pack seems to be getting heavier. A couple years ago I bought SX50HS. It's great! Since then bought a refurb for my wife. The quality is great, and the size means it's always there and handy. Friend has Nikon 900. We both prefer the Canon.
I'm interested in your reasoning. Thanks for your input.
Thank you. Having started with Olympus film (OM1) way back when, I'll go back.
Had finally decided to trade my Canon gear for the new Olympus 1 ii. Local camera store (Midwest Photo Exchange) employee tried to steer me away from Olympus to a Fujifilm equivalent. Getting older and wanted to downsize. I had Only OM1 in the past, and liked their stuff. I like the new Pro series lenses. Didn't buy anything that day because the sales guy was so negative. That day he lost a $3500.00 sale. Opinions?
Hands down, 70-200L. So versatile, and so great for wildlife and rodeo.
I'm a Canon guy, but I bought a 2.0 tele for my 70-200 f2.8L lens. The pair has worked flawlessly for years. BTW, the 2.0 is also a white barrel from Canon.
I'd always go the extra $100.00 for the extra quality.
I'm a Texan trapped in Ohio. Finally got some miles on the Heritage today.