Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Dan De Lion
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 42 next>>
Sep 17, 2017 11:35:14   #
selmslie wrote:
I can think of only one other clueless windbag who is as ridiculous.


-----

Ah Selmslie, don't be too hard on yourself. You may be clueless but, you're not a windbag. Try reading and understanding my immediately above post. You know, the one about the 850 being a 25mp FF body. What's your reaction to that?

-----
Go to
Sep 17, 2017 10:56:25   #
Gene51 wrote:


-----

Hello all LKPs: especially, Gene51, Steve Perry, Vince68, and Haydon

Ah, I see the Low Knowledge Photographers (LKP) have roused themselves from their usual stupor in order to demonstrate their profound lack of knowledge.

So listen up, the 850 is a FF 25mp camera. Repeat that several times till it penetrates. This will be the setting to use with 95% of current lenses. It will be interesting to see the effect of down sampling on dynamic range. -- To take full advantage of the sensor the 3 high def. techniques must be observed. Test time, which LKP can list those common techniques. I’m betting none of you can!

It looks to me that the D850 will not only replace the D5 and D500, but also the D750.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 23:16:43   #
rehess wrote:
Another response: your title mis-represents what the article says.
It does not say "best pro camera"
It does say "best all-round DSLR camera", leaving open, for example, the possibility that there might be a {or even many} medium format MILC that would be a better choice for a pro.


-----

You should note that my headline is NOT in quotes. I wrote that same type of headline when I first got the specs from Nikon. That post got around 10 pages of responses. So this current post is reprised from that older post. The quote from photographyblog (the only thing in quotes) stands by itself and buttress' the headline but does not prove it.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 23:00:33   #
nikonbrain wrote:
I didn't say profile a printer , I said PROFILE a monitor.


-----

It takes me about half an hour to profile a new paper. That is, make all the required advanced printer settings adjustments and then save that in a file. A file that can be opened up any time I am using that paper again. Actually for any given paper I'll have 4 such files: Color grade 3, Color grade 2, BW grade 3, and BW grade 2.

Of course I profile my monitors. But I'm sure you recognize that it is not the way for the OP to go.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 22:23:55   #
nikonbrain wrote:
Look I am not going to beat around the bush , you can spend the next 6 months wasting ink and paper and listening to every concieveable way to adjust your printer , or as others has said PROFILE YOUR MONITOR trust me I have been there done that . I spent $300.00 ON a Eye One display 1 , and never looked back .You don't have to spend that much , but you need to do it . Any monitor profiler is better than none .Or simply turn down the brightness on the monitor for now until the print matches the monitor . Most monitors have a fast track or pro way to adjust color correction and brightness . Once done you will wonder why you didn't do it sooner . Remember , if your prints are dark you are looking at a too bright a monitor , if your prints are light your monitor is too dark , rarely happens that print are too light. The site I use is GretagMcbeth x- rite they also make the Color Munkey not sure on spelling . It is Color Munki on Amazon prime $168.99. Well spent money I personally would get the Eye One display pro $ 239.00
Look I am not going to beat around the bush , you ... (show quote)


-----

Re-read the original post. This post is about a 4 (four) color (CMYK), all in one Epson Printer. That's a copier, printer, fax machine with maybe a telephone. Check out my suggestion, you'll find it more appropriate.

BTW - It takes about half an hour to profile a new paper.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 22:08:11   #
Apaflo wrote:
If the Epson profiles do not appear correct, it is only because your monitor is not properly calibrated.

It is best to calibrate the monitor, though for less than perfection there is a generally good enough method.

Download any of several test images and print one of them without any editing at all. That print will be very very close to "right". Then adjust the monitor brightness to match the print.

That will get "correct" image brightness, but it won't (exactly) match color variations at different brightness levels. Frankly most photographers can't see the difference and when they learn how they are willing to do more proper monitor calibration.
If the Epson profiles do not appear correct, it is... (show quote)


-----

So you never touch Epson's brightness, contrast, saturation, C, M, Y controls? I do. I have for many years with many Epson printers. Doesn't seem to hurt my sales.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 17:40:16   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
Is that denial or blind sighted by you?


-----

Read the reviews and judge for yourself!

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 17:14:14   #
Dan De Lion wrote:
-----

The reviews are starting to come in for the Nikon D850. To quote from Photographyblog: "Offering a compelling balance of size and speed, the Nikon D850 is the best all-round DSLR camera that we've ever had the pleasure of reviewing. This is really the one camera that can do it all, from landscapes to action, reportage to weddings, the D850 handles it all with aplomb." I anticipate the three usual responses: 1)we don't have enough information, 2)there's no such thing as the world's best camera, 3)mirrorless cameras rock. What other bodies would you nominate for world's best?

-----
----- br br The reviews are starting to come in f... (show quote)


-----

There's a forth response I didn't mention - DENIAL!

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 17:08:08   #
burkphoto wrote:
Dan, every Epson I've ever owned has worked just fine, out of the box, so long as the images I fed it looked fine on a PROPERLY calibrated and custom ICC profiled monitor, and I used Epson papers with Epson inks and chose the correct printer driver settings.

It's all a system. If your prints don't match the monitor, and you absolutely know you are using the correct profile for that printer/paper/ink combination, then the monitor is not properly calibrated and profiled, OR there is a profile mismatch somewhere.
Dan, every Epson I've ever owned has worked just f... (show quote)


-----

You're the first person I ever heard about that was satisfied with the Epson profiles. Perhaps we have different quality standards. BTW I use only Epson inks and papers and profiled monitors.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 17:00:38   #
PixelStan77 wrote:
How much did this expert get paid to call it Best all aroundDSLR?


-----

The site and reviewer are quite reputable. It is an English site of long standing.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 16:52:57   #
-----

The reviews are starting to come in for the Nikon D850. To quote from Photographyblog: "Offering a compelling balance of size and speed, the Nikon D850 is the best all-round DSLR camera that we've ever had the pleasure of reviewing. This is really the one camera that can do it all, from landscapes to action, reportage to weddings, the D850 handles it all with aplomb." I anticipate the three usual responses: 1)we don't have enough information, 2)there's no such thing as the world's best camera, 3)mirrorless cameras rock. What other bodies would you nominate for world's best?

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 15:38:22   #
Mary Kate wrote:
Stupid little man. You made an assumption about me. When you make ASSumptions, you inherit the first three letters of the word. It suits you. Stick to your sheep and you will be ok.


-----

Ah, a disturbed NYC snowflake. It is fascinating to note you guys melting at the very slightest provocation. Tell me, did you vote for deBlasio, are you a global warming believer, do you know that the First Amendment is only for speech snowflakes approve of? These are keystones of NYC snowflakes world views.

Don't forget a melted snowflake is a drip.

As for my relations with sheep, it is none of your business!

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 14:58:36   #
-----

Geez, is this typical of Attic posts? So bland. So inconsequential. So boring. So long.

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 14:40:55   #
Mary Kate wrote:
At times this the Attic.


-----

Well, well. Do I detect an NYC snowflake? Competition and striving make for great results. Safe spaces and micro-aggression worries make dependent, ineffectual snowflakes. To quote Harry Truman: "if you don't like the heat, stay out of the kitchen."

-----
Go to
Sep 15, 2017 13:25:41   #
dieseldave wrote:
I got a new cymk Epson printer, it's an all in one so I don't expect the greatest results, but the printed copies are all darker than the ones on the monitor.Is this something that can be fixed by calibrating one or the other, or does it have to do with RGB v. CYMK? I may be able to save the RAW edited file to CYMK, I haven't tried that yet, hoping to get some direction from the hog first. I normally use Shutterfly, and sending them a jpeg is reproduced fine.
Thanks


-----

To keep it simple. Adjust your monitor till images on the web look great. Then leave your monitor alone. Adjust your printers settings (under "advanced" on the second page) for brightness, contrast, saturation, and color balance, to match your monitor.

Of the 20 or so Epson printers I've owned, not one has come out-of-the-box making good prints without adjusting the "advanced" settings.

Don't forget that ambient room light will change the look of the pics on your monitor. Try to keep the ambient light constant.

-----
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 42 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.