Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: marki3rd
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 44 next>>
Aug 6, 2017 12:08:05   #
Luckystrike wrote:
What does FF mean? I see it mentioned often.


Full Frame - meaning same sensor size as 35mm film camera image as opposed to "Crop Sensor" which applies to any sensor size smaller than FF.
Go to
Aug 6, 2017 11:24:44   #
rcdovala wrote:
Why do you say there is nothing to be gained by an upgrade? The D610 has 24.3 MP and the D810 has 36.3 MP. It seems to me there is significant gain to be had.


Pixel count is not the only thing that effects IQ. Many factors should be considered when evaluating desirability of an upgrade.
Go to
Aug 6, 2017 11:05:37   #
IsoBob wrote:
How did you get the shutter count. I have tried numerous ways and still can't get something that works for Canon!


There are utility programs that can be downloaded on the internet. The best one in my opinion is called "Digital Info" and it is free. You can use is as often as you want on as many Canon Cameras as you want. It doesn't work with all Canon cameras - some early models and some later models, but it works on this camera.

I am attaching an example of it's output.


Go to
Aug 6, 2017 10:57:38   #
Ghery wrote:
On my T5i I just use the file number for the pictures. I left the camera in its default mode for labeling pictures. And then remembered when I passed 10,000 pictures. :-)


Not an accurate way to get actual shutter count.
Go to
Aug 6, 2017 10:52:14   #
4OX wrote:
priced way too high...barely off the new one on the tele 1,4!


Another Troll that likes to shoot down other people. Makes them feel better and important - which they definitely are NOT!
Go to
Aug 6, 2017 10:39:50   #
WF2B wrote:
If anyone is looking at this lens, understand that it is a discontinued version based on my research on google.


There have been three versions of this lens:

1.) Had metal mount
2.) Same as 1 but plastic mount (the version being sold here. Since so small and light, plastic mount is plenty strong.)
3.) Has metal mount (again) and has the STM Focusing Motor.

Note: All three versions have identical optics
Go to
Jul 31, 2017 21:32:05   #
Gene51 wrote:
Wait until you try and sell it and the prospective buyer asks the question - Is this lens gray market? There goes your savings . . . Just sayin'


That's a crock. Warranties only protect an original purchaser, so Grey Market has absolutely no impact for someone buying second hand.
Go to
Jul 23, 2017 20:25:41   #
Apaflo wrote:

Back off your camera to subject distance and there will be less distortion. You might also try a full frame sensor using a similar focal length to achieve the same framing at a better distance.


I think you have it backwards. With a FF at the same framing the camera would have to be closer to the subject and it seems to me would therefore have more perspective distortion. No??
Go to
Jul 22, 2017 08:38:37   #
copladocus wrote:
I do principle photography for an auction company where all auctions are conducted on line. As such the photos are very important and we take a lot of them depending on the value of the item or group of items. I do a lot of table top work where we lay out a "lot" of items. We work mainly with on camera flash but do occasionally use large softboxes. In addition we take photos of furniture, automobiles and even houses that are up for auction. Since these are going on line we dfo not need a lot of megapixels and in fact most of our photos are 500KB or less as uploading large photo files is prohibitively slow and really doesn't add to the viewer experience.

I am currently using a Canon 10D with an EF 24-85 zoom and Speedlight 430EXII flash and getting good results but feel I am fighting the camera a lot and chimping is problematic with the small LCD panel and my tired old eyes.

I am thinking about getting the new Canon 6D MkII and the 24-105 f/4L IS II USM series lens that will be shipped as a kit. I thought about just getting the lens and tried it out at a local camera store but that does not solve the problem I have reviewing the shots in the camera. And it is a fantastic lens IMHO.

Please tell me I am nuts and need to save my money.
I do principle photography for an auction company ... (show quote)


Well, given your requirements as you state them, I would say a new camera would be a welcome improvement, so my advise is to buy a more capable new camera and possibly new glass as well. However, having said that, I believe a 6D MkII and 24-105 1:4L IS USM Lens is going way overboard for those requirements and a completely unnecessary expenditure. If the cost is not a consideration for you then I would certainly not discourage you, but you do not need to spend anywhere near that amount to more than satisfy your needs.

Therefore, my recommendation would be to go for something like a Canon EOS 750D/T6i which has a 24 Mp Sensor, and a 3" Articulated LCD as well as WIFI which would allow for Tethered use which you indicated might be a consideration for you. You might also pair that with any of the Canon EF-s STM Kit Zoom Lenses which would also provide IS for hand held shooting. Which STM Lens you selected would depend on what focal length range you feel would best suit your needs. The EF-s 18-55mm and/or 55-250mm for instance are superbly sharp lenses every bit as good optics as the L lens you mention. The only thing you would loose with the kit lenses is build quality, but the new STM Lenses are actually quite good in that regard while being lighter weight.

I suggest you Google these options and see what the expert reviewers have to say.

Good luck with your decisions.
Go to
Jul 21, 2017 15:39:18   #
harrimg wrote:
Look at a gimble instead of a ball mount, think you will like it much better.


Gimbals are ideal for large lenses that have a mounting foot attached to the lens but not so good for cameras with smaller lenses where the camera is attached to the head.
Go to
Jul 21, 2017 15:33:15   #
fotoman150 wrote:
Ok my batteries arrived today.

I read the instructions but they were not very thorough.

My question is: Do I want to completely discharge my batteries before I charge them again? Will I create a memory problem with the batteries only partially charging if I don't fully discharge them every time?


No, the batteries you have are Li-Ion and they have no memory problem unlike the old NiCad and to a lesser extent NiMh batteries. They there for require no deep discharge to prevent memory problems.
Go to
Jul 21, 2017 14:39:47   #
Coyote9269 wrote:
I started to have some issues with my Nikon Speed light. I did a little looking around and found that Neewer and Youngnuo flashes were significantly cheaper in price. I ordered both on Amazon, but I am finding that they get very hot with minimal use. Does anyone have any thoughts or experience on them ?


Define "minimal use".
Go to
Jul 20, 2017 12:31:25   #
cthahn wrote:
There probably is no way to do this.


Your wrong!!! Necessary converter readily available. Why do you insist on posting to so many threads you know nothing about???
Go to
Jul 17, 2017 09:10:56   #
rjwheaton wrote:
Hi,
I'm experimenting with high speed stop action photography. Currently, I'm designing a high intensity LED strobe, and pushing the envelope "just for fun."

My question is, how quickly can the LCD respond? For example, I'm currently producing LED flashes at 1 microsecond, and should be able to get down to much less than that.

Any thoughts?


I find it hard to believe "1 microsecond" duration LED Flashes. Your title mentions CCD's. CCD Digital Camera Sensors are not commonly used now days. As already asked, what do you mean by LCD (Liquid Crystal Display).
Go to
Jul 16, 2017 16:16:26   #
Peterff wrote:
If you can stretch to the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM it would be worth doing. Try used on KEH: https://www.keh.com/shop/canon-55-mm-250-mm-f-4-5-6-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-ef-ef-s.html It is abetter lens than the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II.

Good luck


Yes!! The Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM is a very good highly regarded relatively inexpensive zoom lens. Much much better than the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II. Google it to get a lot of opinions of how good it is.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 44 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.