Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: sheryloneal
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 next>>
Oct 12, 2012 10:08:24   #
rts2568 wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
rts2568 wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
rts2568 wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
I still like rts2568 the best. Pic dudes is really good too.



To Sheryloneal
From rts2568

Thanks Sheryl the feedback is appreciated, confirms that someone is watching.

The real lesson there though, was the point that the original imagery was not sharp. Now whether that came from the download to UHH, as one I tried last night to do and which came out on UHH as a complete disaster; or if the original shot was not sharp in the first place, is anybody's guess, other than the OP.



Thanks anyway Sheryl,

rts2568

PS - Sorry Sheryl, are you talking about the deer or the mother, we have a parallel running link here.
Whichever I suppose, it doesn't really matter as neither could be finished off because of the underlying problems.

rts2568
quote=sheryloneal I still like rts2568 the best. ... (show quote)


I'm talking about the mother one. I agree with you about the sharpness and clarity of the original. Its an old pic. I should have been more complete with my opinion. Yours gave the photo an almost "painted" appearance. With all the damage that was done, to me, came out looking the best with what was left of the photo to work with. If I was to restore it I would have done the same as you but done it all over. Make it more uniform. It had a more "intended" look about it. Like brush strokes not blended completely because the artist was going for that certain look.
quote=rts2568 quote=sheryloneal I still like rts... (show quote)


To Sherylopneal
Fron rts2568

Thanks for clearing that up Sheryl. After sending my question to you I realised there are three examples in this thread - getting very complicated.
You are right though, I think mine is best also but then, I would, wouldn't I? Only you and me though, so we seem to be a minority - never mind eh?

Ok, mine is/was un unfinished by far but at the time I felt the best advice that could've been given was to help Harvie through to the learning of his own version of Photoshop, however, I'd not realised he only had an SE version of Photoshop which does limit the tools functions. Maybe he will go for the full version some time and benefit from learning to do his own retouching: or download something like GIMP to put him on the right path.

The Sepia too, needs to be dropped, especially now that we know the original was in B&W. Mother will have remembered this one in its original state too, so in B&W it should be, unless she requested otherwise; Mothers being what they are though, who'se to know.

This theme has brought out the best and the worst and also hopefully, will have been a learning experience for many; here's to the latter.

rts2568
quote=sheryloneal quote=rts2568 quote=sherylone... (show quote)


Thanks rts.
Im still using Picasa so what im learning from everyone here is awesome.
quote=rts2568 quote=sheryloneal quote=rts2568 ... (show quote)



to Sheryl
From rts2568

Hi again Sheryl,

Some people sware by Picasa, so all I can say is for you to practice, then practice some more, it is quite a useful application and one that easily gives you the first step up towards rewarding post processing.

Wish you luck with it.

rts2568
quote=sheryloneal quote=rts2568 quote=sherylone... (show quote)



Thank you rts. I'm new so Picasa is fun, for now... I'm already itching to do more. I'm looking at stepping up soon.
Go to
Oct 12, 2012 01:35:18   #
sheryloneal wrote:
katymom wrote:
I would like to know how I can go about fixing the highlights in this photo of the Hotel Coronado in San Diego. Can anyone help me? Thanks!


Did this in a few seconds with Picasa.


Picasas free!!! Double awesome!! :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 12, 2012 01:34:26   #
katymom wrote:
I would like to know how I can go about fixing the highlights in this photo of the Hotel Coronado in San Diego. Can anyone help me? Thanks!


Did this in a few seconds with Picasa.


Go to
Oct 12, 2012 01:12:10   #
jim charron wrote:
Picassa changes.


I like this. I use Picasa for all my sports post editing. Like this one:


Go to
Oct 12, 2012 00:32:11   #
gonate wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
gonate wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
TrishV wrote:
Can anyone tell me why I get this affect on some of my photos please? I am using a Canon 7D and this photo was taken with a EFS 15-85mm lens with the correct Canon hood. It has happened with and without the sun in the picture.
Thank you.


I have the Canon D60 and noticed the other day that when i took the hood off and flipped it around to store it was on cockeyed. It had a slight tilt to it. Thats what this looks like to me. :?


OK!!! so fine fix the hood.
quote=sheryloneal quote=TrishV Can anyone tell m... (show quote)


Dont yell at me gonate. Im new here. :-(
quote=gonate quote=sheryloneal quote=TrishV Can... (show quote)


Problem solved.
quote=sheryloneal quote=gonate quote=sherylonea... (show quote)


I think so.
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:58:33   #
rts2568 wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
rts2568 wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
I still like rts2568 the best. Pic dudes is really good too.



To Sheryloneal
From rts2568

Thanks Sheryl the feedback is appreciated, confirms that someone is watching.

The real lesson there though, was the point that the original imagery was not sharp. Now whether that came from the download to UHH, as one I tried last night to do and which came out on UHH as a complete disaster; or if the original shot was not sharp in the first place, is anybody's guess, other than the OP.



Thanks anyway Sheryl,

rts2568

PS - Sorry Sheryl, are you talking about the deer or the mother, we have a parallel running link here.
Whichever I suppose, it doesn't really matter as neither could be finished off because of the underlying problems.

rts2568
quote=sheryloneal I still like rts2568 the best. ... (show quote)


I'm talking about the mother one. I agree with you about the sharpness and clarity of the original. Its an old pic. I should have been more complete with my opinion. Yours gave the photo an almost "painted" appearance. With all the damage that was done, to me, came out looking the best with what was left of the photo to work with. If I was to restore it I would have done the same as you but done it all over. Make it more uniform. It had a more "intended" look about it. Like brush strokes not blended completely because the artist was going for that certain look.
quote=rts2568 quote=sheryloneal I still like rts... (show quote)


To Sherylopneal
Fron rts2568

Thanks for clearing that up Sheryl. After sending my question to you I realised there are three examples in this thread - getting very complicated.
You are right though, I think mine is best also but then, I would, wouldn't I? Only you and me though, so we seem to be a minority - never mind eh?

Ok, mine is/was un unfinished by far but at the time I felt the best advice that could've been given was to help Harvie through to the learning of his own version of Photoshop, however, I'd not realised he only had an SE version of Photoshop which does limit the tools functions. Maybe he will go for the full version some time and benefit from learning to do his own retouching: or download something like GIMP to put him on the right path.

The Sepia too, needs to be dropped, especially now that we know the original was in B&W. Mother will have remembered this one in its original state too, so in B&W it should be, unless she requested otherwise; Mothers being what they are though, who'se to know.

This theme has brought out the best and the worst and also hopefully, will have been a learning experience for many; here's to the latter.

rts2568
quote=sheryloneal quote=rts2568 quote=sherylone... (show quote)


Thanks rts.
Im still using Picasa so what im learning from everyone here is awesome.
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:48:16   #
Rustybucket wrote:
jerryc41 wrote:
I'm working on some dog pictures taken with flash, and there is the inevitable green eye. Is there a way to deal with that in LR4.1?


Aaaaah...so cute, I couldn't help trying to fix them. I desaturated the green fringed eyes (with sponge tool set to De-saturate)then painted a little bit of brown on the Iris area. Made a new layer and painted in the blown out pupils with near black. Made new layer and painted in the tiny catchlights. Job done. I've had the same problem many times when I've had to shoot with on-board flash. Necessity forced to to find a cure :-). Hope this helps you with the problem.
quote=jerryc41 I'm working on some dog pictures t... (show quote)


This one is awesome!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:45:41   #
alann wrote:
I am new to photoshop. Did my best.;)


OMG Hahahahahahaha!!! Thats funny!!
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:14:32   #
DANthephotoMAN wrote:
Sheesh, bad attempt, but better than green eyes...


Dan thats just creepy. :shock:
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:13:11   #
jerryc41 wrote:
russelray wrote:
Are you wanting to turn those alien dogs into Earth dogs? lol

No. If I did, they would lose their super powers.


LOL!
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:08:25   #
gonate wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
TrishV wrote:
Can anyone tell me why I get this affect on some of my photos please? I am using a Canon 7D and this photo was taken with a EFS 15-85mm lens with the correct Canon hood. It has happened with and without the sun in the picture.
Thank you.


I have the Canon D60 and noticed the other day that when i took the hood off and flipped it around to store it was on cockeyed. It had a slight tilt to it. Thats what this looks like to me. :?


OK!!! so fine fix the hood.
quote=sheryloneal quote=TrishV Can anyone tell m... (show quote)


Dont yell at me gonate. Im new here. :-(
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 23:02:14   #
rts2568 wrote:
sheryloneal wrote:
I still like rts2568 the best. Pic dudes is really good too.



To Sheryloneal
From rts2568

Thanks Sheryl the feedback is appreciated, confirms that someone is watching.

The real lesson there though, was the point that the original imagery was not sharp. Now whether that came from the download to UHH, as one I tried last night to do and which came out on UHH as a complete disaster; or if the original shot was not sharp in the first place, is anybody's guess, other than the OP.



Thanks anyway Sheryl,

rts2568

PS - Sorry Sheryl, are you talking about the deer or the mother, we have a parallel running link here.
Whichever I suppose, it doesn't really matter as neither could be finished off because of the underlying problems.

rts2568
quote=sheryloneal I still like rts2568 the best. ... (show quote)


I'm talking about the mother one. I agree with you about the sharpness and clarity of the original. Its an old pic. I should have been more complete with my opinion. Yours gave the photo an almost "painted" appearance. With all the damage that was done, to me, came out looking the best with what was left of the photo to work with. If I was to restore it I would have done the same as you but done it all over. Make it more uniform. It had a more "intended" look about it. Like brush strokes not blended completely because the artist was going for that certain look.
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 22:14:11   #
I still like rts2568 the best. Pic dudes is really good too.
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 21:41:59   #
mmajor48 wrote:
Help - New member and new to digital photography. Acquired a Sony NEX7 recently. Ploughing my way through David Busch's excellent book. Can't believe all the latest gadgetry this camera has - will take a long time to master half of it!

However, shortly after buying the camera I took some family pictures (one attached) where the colours were all wrong - a lot of mauve where there wasn't any. Assuming this is not a hardware fault, and it's user inadequacy (!), can anyone tell me what I did wrong/why it happened? Thanks.
Help - New member and new to digital photography. ... (show quote)


Im new as well. Many mistakes and still many to go im sure but ive never seen this. Not on photos them selves or on the LCD screen. And Ive had my settings on some CRAZY settings just to see what happens.
Go to
Oct 11, 2012 21:19:27   #
TrishV wrote:
Can anyone tell me why I get this affect on some of my photos please? I am using a Canon 7D and this photo was taken with a EFS 15-85mm lens with the correct Canon hood. It has happened with and without the sun in the picture.
Thank you.


I have the Canon D60 and noticed the other day that when i took the hood off and flipped it around to store it was on cockeyed. It had a slight tilt to it. Thats what this looks like to me. :?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.