Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DebAnn
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 461 next>>
Mar 16, 2024 11:18:27   #
drsdayton wrote:
I've got an ET-7700 that I have been trying to resurrect (Nozzle Cleaning / Power Cleaning) to provide (just) acceptable prints. I thought I was having some luck...but after a couple decent prints it reverted back to ink spray and color problems. Frustrating...

I've been contemplating trading up to an Epson ET-8550. All I read indicates it should be a much stronger photo printer. Does anyone have any experience to share?

Would hope to be able to get to a space where I don't feel like I am always fighting the printer.

Thx in advance.

Doug
I've got an ET-7700 that I have been trying to res... (show quote)


I had to give up on my Epson 3000 printer a few months ago. It was past redemption. It worked wonderfully for a very long time but such printers have a lifespan. I did have it professionally cleaned a couple of times but an Epson rep at a professional photography show told me honestly that after a few years and the beginning of problems, it's time to buy a new one.
Go to
Mar 16, 2024 11:10:25   #
Anthony padua wrote:
Magazine would not accept.Kate.Middletons photo.because it was edited she admitted she had done it herself where does this leave all you hoggers


The Kate affair is all so stupid. The British press is the worst of the worst when it comes to invading famous people's lives. Even a future queen is entitled to some privacy. Nobody has the right to know everything about her. So what if she made a few tweaks to the photo? That doesn't mean that she wasn't really in the shot, that she's dying or hiding somewhere. The dastardly so-called photojournalists should leave her alone. Oh, and i'm a Brit.

Sorry for the rant.
Go to
Feb 23, 2024 17:53:53   #
Blenheim Orange wrote:
I watched a video on YouTube tonight of colorized Civil War era photos. Most of the photos I have seen many, many times over the years, and I am amazed by the difference it makes to see them in color.

I'll put the link in the next post.


For me, seeing historical photos in colour is not necessary. I think they look inaccurate. Colour isn't needed to see life as it was. In fact, there are lots of photos that are so perfect in black and white that they need nothing else introduced to make them better. That's my personal opinion, of course. Can you tell that I prefer B&W over colour?
Go to
Feb 23, 2024 17:47:42   #
Longshadow wrote:


Kinda like a pair of pants.....
Ever see someone wearing one pant?


Such a good point. I'm a copywriter who produces copy for a clothing retailer's website. They continually send me information that talks about a pant or a jean. They say that the client is always right. Rather than get into an argument about what marketers put on the web these days (apparently they know what's what!) I quietly change the composition so it's acceptable to two-legged shoppers.
Go to
Feb 22, 2024 18:28:16   #
srsincary wrote:
The visits are often after sunset, so the light is so-not-golden!

Comments and critiques welcome.


Beautiful!
Go to
Feb 14, 2024 18:24:36   #
markngolf wrote:
How about you in your "yut"

Mark


Yep - I remember that!
Go to
Feb 14, 2024 18:23:49   #
tramsey wrote:
If someone posts a photo on the internet it becomes public domain, that's been understood since the internet was created


I really don't think that's true. Even if you post someone's photo somewhere for info purposes, you still should say who shot it.
Go to
Feb 11, 2024 07:06:45   #
Horseart wrote:
thing I have painted for myself in a very long time. Now that I have retired ...almost ...maybe from doing commission work, I had a blast painting just what I wanted to instead of something to sell. Oh what fun!!!!


Great job!
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 14:44:01   #
kpsk_sony wrote:
OOOH! take me with you! I'm a good cook and promise not to whine much about the bugs!


There weren't any buzzy bugs in October!
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 12:05:46   #
gtilford wrote:
I went out on January 28, 2024 to a new area for me at a spot called F.W.R. Dickson Wilderness Area just because the day was so nice for the end of January, it was about 4 degrees Celsius (about 40 Fahrenheit) and the sun even tried poking thru the cloud cover a few times. I had seen that there had been a few Tufted Titmouse seen in this location and since it had been a few years since I had seen any and this area was only about 30 minutes from home I thought why not.

It ended up being one of those fantastic days when you are out birding that it seems like you can do no wrong and even the bird that for the past 8 years I have spent the entire year trying to get a decent photo of showed up and showed off. Everything was shot on my old Nikon d300 using the Sigma 100-400mm, edited in Affinity and Topaz Photo AI

Hope you enjoy the photos and since this is my first post of the new year I wish you all the best in 2024.
I went out on January 28, 2024 to a new area for m... (show quote)


Nice to see so many pretty birds in Ontario. In Toronto, haven't seen anything much except crows every few days. No cardinals or even sparrows lately. No snow either - sunny day with blue skies today.
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 12:02:21   #
Bubalola wrote:
Gerritsen Beach, NY

Please Download and
Thanks for Viewing

Eugene


Lovely shot!
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 12:01:38   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Sorry, but this doesn't apply to people. Small dogs with long snouts tend to live longer that flat-faced dogs. That seems to be true in my experience.

Smaller dogs with long noses, like miniature dachshunds and shiba inus, live the longest, according to an analysis of over 580,000 dogs in the UK. After studying data from various sources, including vets, pet insurance companies and animal welfare charities, researchers found that small, long-nosed dogs of both sexes had the highest life expectancy, surviving 13.3 years on average. With an expected lifespan of just 9.1 and 9.6 years old, male and female medium-sized, flat-faced dogs had the worst outcomes, respectively. “Many flat-faced breeds, small or large, don’t do well, for example French bulldogs, St Bernards and presa canarios,” says Kirsten McMillan at Dogs Trust, a welfare charity in the UK.
NewScientist
Sorry, but this doesn't apply to people. Small do... (show quote)


That's simply because the breeding of flat-faced dogs interferes with their breathing ability so they are more likely to get poor health outcomes at an earlier age. Breeders should be blamed for wanting looks rather than health.
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 11:59:08   #
Terje76 wrote:
Came across this Heron. My god I almost pissed my pants😳🤪. He was huge and looked like he was ready to fight. 😳 He flew away a couple of seconds later 😇


That's funny - but I expect he was just drying off his feathers.
Go to
Feb 3, 2024 11:57:38   #
jaymatt wrote:
Madison County, Indiana


Go to
Feb 3, 2024 11:56:31   #
azted wrote:
Two nights ago I did a gig at a Chamber of Commerce event at a very high end community center. I was hired by the chamber, as was a social media guy, and a video guy. There was also an independent person taking photos. What we all had in common (and this has never happened before!) was we were all using Sony equipment. Now I know this will ruffle the gentle feathers of so many on this blog, but the reality is that market share is everything, and I as a Sony shooter am even amazed at how much is changing in the professional sphere. Years ago it was rare to find a pro shooting Sony, and now it seems that we are the majority. For there to be four image makers at an event and all of them using Sony had me pretty shocked. People vote with their feet and their money, and the other brands have to be on notice to up their game.
Two nights ago I did a gig at a Chamber of Commerc... (show quote)


It really doesn't matter. The best camera is the one that the individual photographer likes best.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 461 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.