I think your proposed image is undersized. With 24 being the combined width, you will be short by the width of the spine.

If I am misunderstanding I offer my humblest of apologies.

several comments - Whether or not this is a composite may be unimportant, but the download makes me think that it is.

Although there is green, it is not a major player in the image.

I was confused about why this is in the wedding section.

Les look at your rhetorical question a bit differently. No matter what level of skill a professional possesses, he is a surrogate for someone who is paying him. Why should he have any expectations that he is more important than those of the "mob". This may be appropriate for a wedding where he is hired by someone who is paying for an event. As a general statement, however, why should a professional have any preference not offered by anything but his own sense of arrogance and entitlement.

I am not going to agree that this is a throwaway shot. This is one of those images that I capture on vacation when I don't have time to work the scene. If I were considering a lot of work in post, the cost of printing on fine art paper, museum glass, a frame and a mat - it would be one of those times when the finger wouldn't touch the shutter release. Its value rests with the purpose.

Because this was put up to garner opinions, I will add a few more thoughts. In addition to the cars parked off to the left, there are 3 or 4 to the right and another 3 or 4 on a road in the background. The main part of the picture as I see it is the stream and the well. I believe the image would be greatly strengthened if a significant amount of the foreground were removed and there was a much shorter run to the well. Whether one were to remove the tree on the left or retain it is a matter of opinion. The problem is that there is just too much to the left of the well and too much in front of it. Much of the problem with the cars on the right can be improved with judicious cropping.

My solution to the whole matter is really simple. Use a lens of proper length ( perhaps something that approximates normal) and get closer. From the proper distance and with considered angulations of the lens, most of the excessive areas to the left, right and vertical can be eliminated. It is a matter of choosing the most desirable composition and setting the crop in advance by lens choice and foot placement.

Many of my thoughts are in agreement with Steve. But it has often been said that one man's junk is another's treasure.

Steve, I hear what you are saying and I understand. I think a greater problem is the tree. I am a proponent of framing and trees often work well - when utilized with consideration to the entire image, they are wonderful tools of perspective. This one is problematic for the image: it is too dark and takes up too much viewing area. Simply, when considering balance, it is too overwhelming.

Although the lighthouse is thought to be the focus of attention, its presence has been downplayed. Keep the lighthouse, but call a tree surgeon. Then give consideration to the position and elevations of the camera.

I think this is assa9

There was a comment regarding the sky. Residing in Pittsburgh, I could have thought that the statue of Fred Rodgers was merely an attempt show off this rare, blue phenomenon.

I can understand why some would think that this sky is a distraction; it is, however, a descriptor of Mr. Rodgers television persona.

This subject requires a very simple presentation - and you have provided one.

I am not sure what you mean by professional service. However, Costco will print to the maximum size their machines allow and then cut the paper to the size you specify. If you are satisfied with their printing, you will be more than happy with the price.

The image is an urban scene and the lettering on the awning and the hydrant are parts of that scene. I find the hydrant, however, a bit distracting because it is what draws me into the image - not the intended clock.

I generally prefer to leave cityscapes as they are: they are a particular place at a particular time. It is like taking the picture of a stranger on the street who happens to have a flower on his lapel. I would tend to not remove it because it belongs - even if a distraction. It helps to define the main subject.

Regarding the reflections, it is a pity that some consider them to be a distraction. Many of us work very hard to capture them. Here, they show that in a complicated cityscape, there is still a blue sky.

With all that said, I like the picture because I am fascinated by these old clocks that represent a previous era. They are signs that name the building or signify its purpose. They are, however, difficult to photograph because they are often not easy to visually extract from their background. Without a greater level of separation, the whole image is just too busy.

I have shot box car loads of film. I thought it was great when, for practical purposes, that was all there was. Now I shoot digital and don't want to go back.

That said, besides being a niche, there is great value in teaching and learning film. It is not just art, it is a view and appreciation of art history. Technology has changed and film and film technology is the stepping stone that was used to build the lessons of today.

The problem seems to be that the student is not getting an insight of today by not getting an appreciation of what has gone on before.

You may be disappointed because you have failed to realize the relevance of her efforts and those of the school. As you expand your own mind, you can help your granddaughter's to grow.

Perhaps not the best camera or lens, but probably adequate.

Instead of adding to he number of sections, I suggest that we consider combining many and use the title that is often used for the original thread:" Help". This category could easily accommodate General Discussion, Analysis, Post Processing, Wedding and even Critique.


Sorry, Mogul, I added this prior to seeing your second entry in this thread.
You are the first one that I remember having this suggestion. I would be pleased to support you if you accept the position as moderator.

I am just one who has grown tired of your repetitive BS.

Simplest thing that has always worked when I have had this problem: check to see that the card has been fully inserted into the slot.

Would you care to share your thoughts on this?