cwp3420

So are firearm owners, the NRA, and gun manufacturers.

cwp3420

Must be why you carry a .22 Short in your pants, midget.

cwp3420

You can’t own automatic weapons unless you go though a thorough background check by the FBI and have tens of thousands of dollars to pay for them. You really know nothing about firearms laws, do you?

cwp3420

Why don’t liberals ever advocate throwing the book at criminals who possess or use firearms in the commission of a crime? Would you support mandatory sentences for them of 25 years per violation, no parole? Also, no bail on those charges. That would stop some of this and not impact lawful owners of firearms.

cwp3420

Ok, SS. Explain to us how all the firearms in the U.S. will be seized by ATF, and explain how you will convince criminals to turn theirs in. Explain how you will stop firearms from being brought in from Mexico and Canada. Explain how long this seizure will take, who will be tasked with seizing firearms, and what the cost to our economy be. Also, explain how you can guarantee, in writing, how no one will ever get or obtain a firearm again.

cwp3420

So, if you are the victim of a home invasion by two or three people, you say you don’t need a firearm. What magic potion do you use in case that happens to you? Of course, I understand you’re a janitor and probably don’t have anything to defend, but play along and humor us with your moronic response.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

The safe is the insurance you fool!
There are plenty of people struggling and need the car to get to work but just can’t afford the insurances, it’s just not in their budget.
Why should they be penalized for what another driver might do?
Are you F*CKING serious?!?!?
Let’s make excuses for EVERY loser!!!
You are gun long and brain short!!! LoL
SS

Wellhiem Loc: Sunny England.

What do you mean by putting it all on responsible gun owners?
If you mean I'm trying to blame them, you should reread the post.


Once again try reading the post. I said we don't encourage kids to take semi-automatic rifles to show and tell.

cwp3420

You bring shame to every graduate of Berkeley with your idiotic reasoning. Why should law abiding gun owners be penalized for what another firearm owner might do? And you still haven’t answered my question about how you propose to get rid of all the guns. I know for certain you can’t do that. You have no idea about any of this, so save yourself the embarrassment of trying to speak to something you don’t understand, moron.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

If anybody says anything with a comprehension above a 3rd grader it just goes in one of your ears, ricochets around your small empty skull and then out your ASS, so why bother?!?!
The LAST thing I need to be worried about is a little hermaphrodeedee like you STONER!!! LoL
SS

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

That's the most intelligent thing you've ever said here, so you can just imagine how STUPID everything else you've ever said is!!!
SS

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Thom knows something you don’t understand...Life Is Wishy-Washy.

It is a constant “On The Other Hand.”

There is very little black or white, but innumerable shades of gray.

The better you understand the reality around you, the more you understand that everything has its good points matched by its bad points, and that the value of anything is measured by its good points counted against its bad points, and final judgement of value is almost always a compromise.

Sjfh

I didn’t say they should be penalized.

We had guns in our home without a safe. When our kids were teens, we got a “cheap” safe....not to keep them from our kids (they were taught gun safety very early because we had them in the house....they were also taught internet safety, which was our parental controls). The safe was to keep their friends away, just in case.

As we bought more, including “assault” rifles, we bought a heavy, expensive, proper safe to safeguard the weapons from falling into the wrong hands in the unlikely event we were burglarized. I’d have preferred a Caribbean vacation, but the safe was the responsible choice.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

I answered one of your posts and ended this way: “The better you understand the reality around you, the more you understand that everything has its good points matched by its bad points, and that the value of anything is measured by its good points counted against its bad points, and final judgement of value is almost always a compromise.”

So, banning video games as you suggest is a good idea in my book. They teach an irresponsible violence and have no constructive value as far as I’m concerned.

Water sports, boating but also swimming, are dangerous, but have practical as well as recreational value, so we try to control them, but banning them is probably impossible. Same situation with aviation, except its practical issues are more important than the water sports—airlines and national defense for example.

We can’t ban knives for the same reason we can’t ban weed or liquor—you can always make or find your own, But knives have good points and bad points (no intended pun) so we try to control them as much as we can.

We’ll never ban guns—there are (I think) 300 million of them in existence in this country, and they have a long life. They also have practical uses that we need—national defense again and law enforcement, for example. Now they have Supreme Court protection, so we’ll continue to use them, and try to control or lessen the bad points.

Now you see, or begin to I hope, life is complex, judgements have to be made, and accommodations made where necessary.

Cars and trucks have both good points and bad points, as do libraries; ditto religion. The same is true of antibiotics and glass, fire and forrests, rivers and lakes, highways and sidewalks, sugar and salt. Beefsteaks and garlic.

We tried to eliminate smallpox because it had no redeeming qualities and was very dangerous. But there is always the fear and probably the fact that countries maintain samples that might be useful in germ warfare. In other words, there might be good in some people’s eyes even in smallpox.

See how complex life can be?

[And Thom already knew that, didn’t he?]

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Grow up clueless one.

Hitler was a far left nut job as was Mussolini.

The NAZI party platform, minus the genocide, was essentially identical to the DNC platform of today. Hitler took his genocidal racist ideas from Marx and Engels.

Hitler and Mussolini hated the Russian international socialism solely because they weren't barking at the Moon loud enough.

The democratic goading FDR was very much Hitler lite and placed a Klansman on the SCOTUS while having 200K citizens placed in camps solely because of their skin color.

You have no clue as to the warped ideology that you support other than what the modern day VOLKISCHER BEOBACHTERS tell you.