tomad wrote:
Say what??! I owned several cameras throughout the 60's and none were even close to the complexity of using a digital camera. Even the most complicated one had three settings; ISO, aperture, and shutter speed. Go get your DSLR manual and count the different settings in the menu...
While at first blush, I agree with Tomad ... but ... How many of today's photogs - including some very good ones - know the "sunny sixteen" rule, as an example? How I would love to take my Canon A1 and adapt a digital back to it. Shutter speed...aperture...ASA. Use the built-in meter, read the scene, make adjustments (to include focus), and "zoom with your feet". Yeah, much simpler than now, but while I am one of those old farts, I am really happy about what is out there for equipment now, and while I'm not as quick about learning it as I used to be I am sure happy about what it can do.
To respond to Lee's original questions:
1) Yes. But most of us aren't
2) I'll respond further down
3) No. But good equipment helps
4) Something we have to live with. Some people are like that.
Now,
2) My adult granddaughter is quite a photographer and has built a nice, useful, kit and portfolio. HER 5-year old daughter received a Fuji Instax for Christmas because she showed an interest in "takin' pixers". Bragging aside, she has an eye for composition: She will move her subjects (including humans) around, get closer if necessary, and will take three or four shots before she'll show us that "this one is best", following what we call the various "rules of composition". What scares me, is that she probably has a better ratio of keepers than I do!!! (It may be that now, with digital, I can take a *lot* more to get that keeper LOL)
But there are some people who have a great eye, just as some who play the drums have no sense of rhythm, and some who drive cars got their license on Amazon. I really hope she is one of the first category.