Why does it take to be a great photographer?
Jan 19, 2018 12:59:04 #
alx
Loc: NJ
Peterff wrote:
Yes, since the court adjudicated that copyright law did not apply to animals. Perhaps we should be discussing more of the "what does it take" rather than the "who takes" to address Lee's question.
Yet the courts will say that a Corporation can hold a copyright. Frequently less than a collection of monkeys. Go figure.
Jan 21, 2018 07:25:33 #
gnawbone
Loc: Southern Indiana
BebuLamar wrote:
1) No! Anyone that takes pictures is a photographer but not neccesarily a great one.
2) No! In my experience great photographers are not really very intelligent.
3) No! Better equipment does help taking better pictures but the photographer is the same not better. That is there could be a great photographer but takes lousy pictures because his camera is too bad.
4) What rude comments you're talking about? What that has to do with photographer good or bad?
2) No! In my experience great photographers are not really very intelligent.
3) No! Better equipment does help taking better pictures but the photographer is the same not better. That is there could be a great photographer but takes lousy pictures because his camera is too bad.
4) What rude comments you're talking about? What that has to do with photographer good or bad?
In response to #2, the best picture taken of anyone in our family, ever, was taken by my niece and she is a blithering idiot.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.