Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How do you watermark/copyright your photos?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Nov 30, 2017 13:02:09   #
2Much Loc: WA
 
eliasharrisphotography wrote:
How do you put in the bottom right or left corner your name or some other watermark?


A good article on the subject:

https://photographylife.com/how-to-watermark-images-in-lightroom

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 13:03:15   #
chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA
 
I used to watermark (sign) *everything* but one day just stopped, at least for my casual and artistic efforts. For commercial, where I sell pics of marching band kids performing, I use an unobtrusive Lightroom sig located bottom right and easily covered if matted (I don't have time to change this while processing, so sometimes, when the colors don't line-up, it gets lost). But, make no mistake, I think any time my eye is drawn to *anything* other than the art, it's ugly. I've recently gotten into framing and mounting some of my stuff and of course there's no watermark or sig...but on the backside of the piece I put the title and my name. I think that's enough.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 13:08:15   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Distracting yes, but watermarks such as this are not easy to remove.
Dngallagher wrote:
Adding info thru the camera is not doing anything special, it is simply adding a "copyright" notice to the EXIF data - 100% editable very easily.

A Watermark is not any kind of protection either - just a signature stamp - I choose to put my name on all the shots I upload to my Flicker Account - Personally I see no detraction by placing a graphic with my initials and name in the lower right of one of my shots. I would not put a watermark on a printed image though.

Watermarks are very easily removed by almost anyone. Protection of copyright is that you maintained the original image and/or you registered the image as a copyright. Lots of discussion about which method is best.
Adding info thru the camera is not doing anything ... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2017 13:27:42   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Distracting yes, but watermarks such as this are not easy to remove.


Really?

And I do not consider myself all that skilled, but there are plenty of easy tools available that anyone can easily use.





Reply
Nov 30, 2017 13:30:31   #
chasgroh Loc: Buena Park, CA
 
Dngallagher wrote:
Really?

And I do not consider myself all that skilled, but there are plenty of easy tools available that anyone can easily use.


...yes for textured monochromatic surfaces it's quick and easy...but put a face in there or any kind of detail...this is what he puts up for sale, pretty sure, the customer doesn't receive it this way...

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 13:35:16   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Good job. How long did it take?
Dngallagher wrote:
Really?

And I do not consider myself all that skilled, but there are plenty of easy tools available that anyone can easily use.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 13:50:42   #
eliasharrisphotography
 


Thank you everybody for your help and opinions! This link helped me greatly! I did not realize this would turn into such a heated debate. :)

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2017 14:07:09   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Fotoartist wrote:
Good job. How long did it take?


Maybe 15-20 seconds....

Opened it up in Snapheal and erased the copyright symbol.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 14:13:24   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
chasgroh wrote:
...yes for textured monochromatic surfaces it's quick and easy...but put a face in there or any kind of detail...this is what he puts up for sale, pretty sure, the customer doesn't receive it this way...


Agree - it depends, but with enough practice and the right tools it may be worth some thieves time and effort. :)

Pretty much, if you post anything anywhere, no matter what you do, it can be stolen. Digimark embeds copyright data within the image data, but that is changing the data, so it might very well degrade the image.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 14:21:11   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
As a tool do you think Snap Heal does a better job than Photoshop's Content-Aware Healing brush?
Dngallagher wrote:
Agree - it depends, but with enough practice and the right tools it may be worth some thieves time and effort. :)

Pretty much, if you post anything anywhere, no matter what you do, it can be stolen. Digimark embeds copyright data within the image data, but that is changing the data, so it might very well degrade the image.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 14:26:11   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Fotoartist wrote:
As a tool do you think Snap Heal does a better job than Photoshop's Content-Aware Healing brush?


It depends - snapheal is fast, but Photoshop is finer control I think.

Reply
 
 
Nov 30, 2017 14:45:47   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Thanks, I'll save the $35 then.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 16:24:38   #
Ike Gittlen
 
really like this shot

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 16:57:11   #
Yankeepapa6 Loc: New York City
 
eliasharrisphotography wrote:
Thank you everybody for your help and opinions! This link helped me greatly! I did not realize this would turn into such a heated debate. :)


You haven't seen anything yet. Wait.

Reply
Nov 30, 2017 16:59:52   #
YvesNY
 
Not always true. I have dozens of paintings without a visible signature on them.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.