If You Could Only Choose One Camera For The Rest Of Your Life Which One Would It Be?
Jun 19, 2017 14:54:50 #
Just Fred wrote:
I'd probably get the Unicorn model A. You know, the one that shoots full-frame RAW in 26MP as well as JPEG, comes equipped with a 10-2000 f/1.2 super zoom, has an articulating touch screen, full viewfinder, weighs just several ounces and fits in my shirt pocket. That one.
When you are ready to sell it PM me. Thanks.
Jun 19, 2017 15:11:01 #
The most I've ever spent on a camera kit is the $700 I spent on a Canon Elan kit in 1995. We're still not floating in money, so I guess I won't spend any more than that for my next one, which may be my last one since I'm currently 69. My current camera is a Pentax, so most likely i'll end up using a K-70.
Jun 19, 2017 15:24:19 #
Leica M Monochrom. I regret selling mine, but am saving for another. Simply magical file quality.
Jun 19, 2017 15:27:06 #
Jim Bob wrote:
Got it...twice. Obviously, I'm only referring to current models. Current models means those still available for purchase even if they are no longer in production.
Sorry, but the "forever" camera hasn't been made yet. I would say a micro four thirds camera the size of the E-M5 II with 6k video, 24MP sensor, 60fps video, and handheld hi-res. It would be delivered by the brown hovertruck, and would be used for shooting pigs in flight.
Jun 19, 2017 17:38:42 #
n3eg wrote:
Sorry, but the "forever" camera hasn't been made yet. I would say a micro four thirds camera the size of the E-M5 II with 6k video, 24MP sensor, 60fps video, and handheld hi-res. It would be delivered by the brown hovertruck, and would be used for shooting pigs in flight.
Jun 19, 2017 18:26:33 #
I currently have a D500 and D7200. At my age, I doubt there will be another camera in my life.
Jun 19, 2017 18:39:59 #
joer wrote:
I would probably choose a 1" sensor superzoom with a fast lens with close up capability if not macro. It would cost less than $1K and need no additional accessories.
If I had no equipment at all and was choosing a camera today that is what I would buy. I think I could do much of what I can with my current equipment with help from LR CC.
I'm tempted...
If I had no equipment at all and was choosing a camera today that is what I would buy. I think I could do much of what I can with my current equipment with help from LR CC.
I'm tempted...
What camera, my friend? Don't be shy.
Jun 19, 2017 18:40:40 #
Quinn 4 wrote:
I could only have one camera. No question Pentax K-1000. I have one for 33+ years, still going great and I got it second hand back 33 years ago. You can use it with out battery. Battery is only for light meter in camera, if the meter should go use 16 rulers of light. Lenses for Pentax K-1000 are found around for very little money. Known what speed film you use, take what every picture you want. You don't have to have PhD to work it. Quinn 4
Interesting choice and rationale.
Jun 19, 2017 18:41:13 #
rook2c4 wrote:
For me, it would have to be a camera I'd feel reasonably confident that it will still be operational (or at least easily repairable) 20, 30 years from now. So probably not a digital camera. Too many electronic components in them that can go bad, and from my experience, LCD display screens seem to have a somewhat limited lifespan. (Without the screen, a digital camera is just about useless.)
Perhaps a Rolleiflex or the like.
Perhaps a Rolleiflex or the like.
Understood.
Jun 19, 2017 18:41:55 #
Jun 19, 2017 18:42:29 #
Jun 19, 2017 18:43:00 #
LFingar wrote:
I would have to say my Canon 5DIV. I'm not sure I would want to give it up even for a 1DxII. The 5DIV is the best all-around camera I have ever owned.
Lots of folks would agree with your choice and with good reason.
Jun 19, 2017 18:43:57 #
Jun 19, 2017 18:45:06 #
IBM wrote:
Would that pick be a free camera , as paying for it out of your own pocket ,you would have a different out come if it was free , as then
You would get the hasablads and pentax 645. And the other that cost $35000 or more that most only dream of ,
You would get the hasablads and pentax 645. And the other that cost $35000 or more that most only dream of ,
Go with the thread as submitted, please. I think it is sufficiently clear.
Jun 19, 2017 18:46:29 #
wmurnahan wrote:
Well my choice would not be a digital since electronics won't last a lifetime. Out of cameras I own, it would be my Rollei or my 4x5 Graflex. If I could have any, it would be a Leica rangefinder. But not wanting to count on film being available for my lifetime, the final choice would be an 8x10 view.
Which one?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.