Haters (Page 2): I hate when people use the PHOTOGRAPHY discussion forum to cry about the way they were treated. Particularly after they took the time to tell somebody they were...

Bill_de Loc: US

I hate when people use the PHOTOGRAPHY discussion forum to cry about the way they were treated. Particularly after they took the time to tell somebody they were unimpressed with what had been posted. Would have been better to move on without saying anything. You reap what you sow. ;)

--

bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.

There are only two people on this board that make any difference,one is you and I am the other.
My only replys to posts are constructive advice answering a specific question. Then of course someone always comes on and tells me I'm wrong.
I just ignore em.

Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States

MtnMan wrote:

As I understand it blocking only affects what the OP sees. Everyone else can see your posts.

...

From the help file:
Users in your ignore list won't be able to send you private messages and can't reply in your topics.

You will not see topics by ignored users in the digest, Newest Topics, Active Topics.

(Users in your ignore list can reply in other users' topics in which you are also replying, and in such case you'll still see their posts. We consider third-party topics to be neutral territory.)

Basil Loc: New Mexico

Um, alrighty then.

Jim Bob

Longshadow wrote:

There is no connection between Trump and Nikon. They are list items of things that he is not worked up about.

Well they both suffer from a lack of good character.

Jim Bob

tyedyetommy wrote:

The point is, I was called a hater. I may not car... (show quote)

Hatred is like a cancer eating at one's soul. Unfortunately, thousands of Americans suffer from it.

Retired fat guy with a camera Loc: Colorado

So I could call the ones who bashed my posts, haters. I could block you all. I didn't and that's the f$#%king point.

chaman

tyedyetommy wrote:

So I could call the ones who bashed my posts, haters. I could block you all. I didn't and that's the f$#%king point.

You need a psychiatrist. If you already have one consider talking him/her about the possibility of increasing your dosages. Your posts contents are a bunch of disorganized, disjointed, nonsense typical of some mental conditions. Good luck

dat2ra Loc: Sacramento

Riiight! And Trump and Co. is setting such a great example of commitment to country, integrity, respect for science and education, jounalism, concern for the un-wealthy citizens, truth and honesty. And don't even get started trying to deflect by comparing with any other administration as the pro-Trump crowd is prone to do. Own your own. There is a reason Trump faces such opposition, and it has nothing to do with Colbert. It has to do with the 3/4 of the country who didn't vote for the guy.

mflowe Loc: Port Deposit, MD

dat2ra wrote:

Riiight! And Trump and Co. is setting such a great example of commitment to country, integrity, respect for science and education, jounalism, concern for the un-wealthy citizens, truth and honesty. And don't even get started trying to deflect by comparing with any other administration as the pro-Trump crowd is prone to do. Own your own. There is a reason Trump faces such opposition, and it has nothing to do with Colbert. It has to do with the 3/4 of the country who didn't vote for the guy.

Aw, poor Buttercup. You forgot to mention he also hates little puppies. According to your math, 25% of the country made him president. What's that say about your candidate? You lost. Grow up. Deal with it.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

dat2ra wrote:

Riiight! And Trump and Co. is setting such a great example of commitment to country, integrity, respect for science and education, jounalism, concern for the un-wealthy citizens, truth and honesty. And don't even get started trying to deflect by comparing with any other administration as the pro-Trump crowd is prone to do. Own your own. There is a reason Trump faces such opposition, and it has nothing to do with Colbert. It has to do with the 3/4 of the country who didn't vote for the guy.

Where did you get the idea that 3/4 of the country didn't vote for president Trump when ONLY 60% of the of our nation's 232 million eligible voters actually voted in 2016? You could in fact also say that 3/4 of the nation didn't vote for Hillary either. Why is this on the Main Photography Section? This will most likely be moved to the attic section, please lay off the bottle or the drugs. :)

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

tyedyetommy wrote:

This earned me a title of hater, and without the ability to reply, as I was blocked.
I do hate snobs.
Tom

LoL, Tom, lots of cowards here. You're just a little new here still, you'll get used to it!
Welcome to the Hog!!!! LoL
SS

dat2ra Loc: Sacramento

Yup, typical pro-Trump response. So consistent. Thanks. And yes, my math is correct. Pax.

blackest Loc: Ireland

Jim Bob wrote:

Well they both suffer from a lack of good character.

He said trump and nikon not trump and nixon :)

Rbode Loc: Ft lauderdale, Fla

dat2ra wrote:

Riiight! And Trump and Co. is setting such a great example of commitment to country, integrity, respect for science and education, jounalism, concern for the un-wealthy citizens, truth and honesty. And don't even get started trying to deflect by comparing with any other administration as the pro-Trump crowd is prone to do. Own your own. There is a reason Trump faces such opposition, and it has nothing to do with Colbert. It has to do with the 3/4 of the country who didn't vote for the guy.