dat2ra wrote:
Yup, typical pro-Trump response. So consistent. Thanks. And yes, my math is correct. Pax.
Typical anti-freedom response. You always start the political arguments, then cry when others call you out. I make it a rule to never ever start a political polemic. Why would I want to anger 50% of the population. I try to get along with everyone, but radical, socialist antifa BS is not going to go unanswered anymore.
mflowe wrote:
Typical anti-freedom response. You always start the political arguments, then cry when others call you out. I make it a rule to never ever start a political polemic. Why would I want to anger 50% of the population. I try to get along with everyone, but radical, socialist antifa BS is not going to go unanswered anymore.
Politics and religion have nothing to do with photography and should be kept out of it. There is always going to be a little bait thrown out but it's best not to rise to it whatever your personal politics. This board is fairly unique having the attic for people to 'discuss' politics. If you must do it do it there please.
It should be obvious that people who hold strong political viewpoints are not going to change their minds because of what anyone says to them especially in a photography section. Maybe it's time for this thread to be moved to the attic, it seems more about bad attitudes than photography, and getting further side tracked into politics.
If we try to be polite to each other then nobodys blood pressure should be getting raised, lets just stick to photography its why we are on this board after all.
sinatraman
Loc: Vero Beach Florida, Earth,alpha quaudrant
"there are people out there who do not love their fellow man, and I hate people like that"----- Tom Leahr.
You are mistaking the 2 meanings of a hater. I would suggest you're being labeled as the informal definition by disagreeing and critical. Sometimes people don't like being called out when they're just trying to be helpful. Oh and by the way, I would be considered a hater in the classical sense when it comes to Hillary, Bill, the Bamster, and Chuck Schumer and wish them no harm just wish they'd go away too. There is common ground!
hat·er
ˈhādər/
noun
a person who greatly dislikes a specified person or thing.
"a man hater"
informal
a negative or critical person.
"she found it difficult to cope with the haters"
tyedyetommy wrote:
So I could call the ones who bashed my posts, haters. I could block you all. I didn't and that's the f$#%king point.
Ah, another one who doesn't get common decency. Must have flunked kindergarten.
Longshadow wrote:
From the help file:
Users in your ignore list won't be able to send you private messages and can't reply in your topics.
You will not see topics by ignored users in the digest, Newest Topics, Active Topics.
(Users in your ignore list can reply in other users' topics in which you are also replying, and in such case you'll still see their posts. We consider third-party topics to be neutral territory.)
Ah, didn't know they couldn't reply in your topics. That's good.
mflowe wrote:
Aw, poor Buttercup. You forgot to mention he also hates little puppies. According to your math, 25% of the country made him president. What's that say about your candidate? You lost. Grow up. Deal with it.
It confirms Hillary couldn't muster even the right 25%. Stuff like that happens if you don't even go to States with electorial votes you need.
Fortunately she has clarified for us that it was the Russians and Comey that did it to her.
I wonder if she sent Trump a Thank You note for firing Comey?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.