Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What made you choose the brand of camera you use?
Page <<first <prev 10 of 11 next>
Feb 9, 2017 18:20:56   #
adamsg Loc: Chubbuck, ID
 
1969 - Nikormat Ftn
1980 - Nikon F (gift from former student)
2012 - Nikon D3100

I started on Nikon products and have found them to be absolutely reliable and ergonomically handy. The glass is great and I have had no problems beyond what 37 years of careful use on the first two camera bodies had done in the way of normal wear and tear. I expect my D3100 to be just as sturdy and productive.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 18:37:40   #
treadwl Loc: South Florida
 
I started with a Nikon because of the lighting system. At the time I started Nikon had the best and the only integrated flash system. By the way, I shoot wildlife and nature. I still went with the flash system. (used for fill)

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 20:11:02   #
weedhook
 
First camera was a Canon TL-QL (easiest camera to load film), added an original Canon F1, added a Canon AE-1P, added a Canon Elan, then jumped to digital with a Canon 60D. The F1 would be my favorite. Probably would have started with a Nkkormat, but everything Nikon was expensive in the film days.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2017 20:58:42   #
FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga
 
EdJames81 wrote:
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I went with an open mind, but after trying out some of the entry level models I decided to settle on the Canon 450d. I liked the way it felt in the hand, I liked the layout of the buttons and I found it user friendly.

Over time I invested in Canon glass (many L series lenses) and accessories so when it came to upgrade it seemed natural to stay with Canon. Besides changing over to another brand would have cost a fortune.

Had my entry level dslr been the Nikon D3300 I would be shooting Nikon, had it been the Olympus I would now be shooting Olympus

I’m interested – what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I wen... (show quote)




Like WF2B it was a Miranda sensorex , must be here hiding somewhere ,also a 5005 Nikon then a Nikon F2as Photomic ,a D70 a D90 then a D7000 plus some other point and shoot camera

Nothing made me choose the camera to start with, after , the name Nikon was mentioned by a person who was working for a magazine and the name stuck with me , not being a pro I didn't have the urge to try anything else to compare it to others, but I am learning everyday !!

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 21:10:41   #
jimmya Loc: Phoenix
 
EdJames81 wrote:
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I went with an open mind, but after trying out some of the entry level models I decided to settle on the Canon 450d. I liked the way it felt in the hand, I liked the layout of the buttons and I found it user friendly.

Over time I invested in Canon glass (many L series lenses) and accessories so when it came to upgrade it seemed natural to stay with Canon. Besides changing over to another brand would have cost a fortune.

Had my entry level dslr been the Nikon D3300 I would be shooting Nikon, had it been the Olympus I would now be shooting Olympus

I’m interested – what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I wen... (show quote)


My first dslr was a Canon. Like you I really liked the layout so I stuck with Canon.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 21:40:24   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I have a number of cameras, both film and digital. I chose them because they were the best I could buy at the time. They still are productive and I plan on keeping them a very long time.
--Bob

EdJames81 wrote:
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I went with an open mind, but after trying out some of the entry level models I decided to settle on the Canon 450d. I liked the way it felt in the hand, I liked the layout of the buttons and I found it user friendly.

Over time I invested in Canon glass (many L series lenses) and accessories so when it came to upgrade it seemed natural to stay with Canon. Besides changing over to another brand would have cost a fortune.

Had my entry level dslr been the Nikon D3300 I would be shooting Nikon, had it been the Olympus I would now be shooting Olympus

I’m interested – what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I wen... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 23:17:18   #
Animallover03
 
I started out with Canon. I first did my research on which cameras I was interested in, then I went to best buy and tried them out a little bit. The Canon felt the best and I felt that I understood it better.

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2017 00:20:15   #
GENorkus Loc: Washington Twp, Michigan
 
EdJames81 wrote:
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I went with an open mind, but after trying out some of the entry level models I decided to settle on the Canon 450d. I liked the way it felt in the hand, I liked the layout of the buttons and I found it user friendly.

Over time I invested in Canon glass (many L series lenses) and accessories so when it came to upgrade it seemed natural to stay with Canon. Besides changing over to another brand would have cost a fortune.

Had my entry level dslr been the Nikon D3300 I would be shooting Nikon, had it been the Olympus I would now be shooting Olympus

I’m interested – what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I wen... (show quote)


Since you only wanted to know about DSLR's, my 1st was a Pentax and the reason is two fold but simple.

1) I already had a couple Pentax lenses although that wasn't the true reason since I was very willing to switch. The Nikon line ran a close second and I almost went that way but after doing my homework on cameras, I found the Pentax much more comfortable and easies to operate.

2) My second reason was simple. The Nikon menu system was really confusing where the Pentax menu just a little confusing.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 00:29:55   #
tvbob
 
Without boring everybody, I had three film Nikons with manual focusing. Great glass. Also purchased a dedicated (and very expensive) Nikon flash unit. When time came for digital, I wanted to stay with Nikon, but since the new cameras were autofocus, I realized that new glass was in order. I also discovered that my expensive flash was incompatible with the digital Nikons. At that point, I felt no loyalty to Nikon. Went to Canon.
After two Canons (most recent a 60D), I just purchased an Olympus mirrorless 4/3 (M1 Mark 2) with some serious Olympus glass and a dedicated Olympus flash.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 00:42:34   #
RonM12 Loc: Washington State
 
My first camera was a Minolta, from there, a Nikon. Put my photography aside to take up scuba diving, could only afford one expensive hobby at a time. Eventually after several years years, sold my dive gear to get back to photography. I looked at both Canon and Nikon, both are excellent cameras. Bought a Nikon D7000, replaced that with a D600, and presently have a D810, which I love.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 01:19:15   #
duck72 Loc: Laurel Ridge, PA
 
burkphoto wrote:
Let's see:

1968 --- borrowed a Canon FX
1969 --- bought a Nikkormat FTn
1970 --- had a Yashicamat 124G at school
1971 --- inherited a Nikon FTN
1979 --- had a Nikon FM at work
1979 --- had a Camerz Classic long roll portrait camera at work
1980 --- had a Yashicamat 124G at work
1981 --- added a Nikon F3 at work
1983 --- added a Calumet 4x5 at work
1985 --- added a pin-registered F3 body at work
1986 --- added a Bronica ETRSi at work
1986 --- added a Canon A-1
1996 --- added a Camerz ZII long roll portrait camera at work
2002 --- added a Nikon D100 at work
2003 --- added a Nikon D70 at work
2004 --- added a Canon 20D at work
2005 --- added a Canon 30D at work
2006 --- added a Canon 5D at work
2007 --- added a Canon 40D at work
2009 --- added a Canon 50D at work
2010 --- added a Canon 7D at work

2012 --- started training project management consulting... looked at everything out there for three years... Waited until someone built what I needed...

2015 --- bought a Panasonic Lumix GH4

There were many, many reasons to buy or use a particular camera along the way. I was brand loyal to Canon and Nikon for decades, and for different reasons.

I bought the GH4 for its balance of features... I do a mix of video and stills, and the GH4 is absolutely perfect for that. When I was at Herff Jones Photography, I had a Nikon D70 and a Canon EOS Dxx of some sort (see above). I also had a separate, heavy Canon GL2 video camera. It drove me crazy that the color of the video and the color of the still camera NEVER matched. It drove me crazy to use three completely different cameras with different menu structures, different lenses, different everything. It drove me crazy to use CF Cards and tape!

The GH4 has solved all that. One bag with two LED lights, two mics, a body, two lenses, spare batteries and SD cards, gray card, ColorChecker, two shoe-mount flashes... and it fits under an airline seat! Add my iPhone 7 Plus to the mix, and that's a guerrilla training content development kit.

The GH4 is 1/4 the size, bulk and weight of a full frame kit, and 1/3 the size, bulk, and weight of an APS-C kit, similarly configured. It has more depth of field at a given aperture, which is usually a GOOD thing for documenting processes. It performs satisfactorily in every respect for the purpose I intended it for when I bought it. The ergonomics are first rate. The body is solid, die-cast Titanium, with weather sealing throughout. The lens OIS is great.

I have the 12-35mm f/2.8 weather-sealed pro zoom and the 35-100mm f/2.8 weather-sealed pro zoom, both of which are light, sharp, and great performers. I know I can get any kind of lens I need to put on the GH4 body, because there are around 90 Micro Four Thirds lenses. Adapters fit just about any full frame lens on it, from the likes of Canon, Nikon, Sony, Alpa, Contarex, Contax, and others.

I can record excellent 4K video, from which I can extract matching 8.2MP JPEGs. Or, I can record video and separate, full resolution matching JPEGs. Or, I can record raw images, and raw plus JPEG images. The options let me do what I need to do.

If I did something else — some other kind of photography — I would have bought something else. Every system is a compromise of some sort. You give up the strengths of some other system to get the strengths you need for the work you do most.

There is plenty of information available on the Internet these days, between YouTube and review sites. You can know every feature about a camera, even download the manual, before you buy or rent to try. I read the reviews and skimmed the manuals of the top choices I had. I tried the GH4 and instantly knew that was "it." I had tried a Sony A6000, and a Fujifilm X-Pro1, and an Olympus OM-D EM-1, each of which was strong in other areas, but none of which had what I needed.

I knew, from borrowing a Canon 5DIII, that the video was good in low light, but average in good light. And I hated the 5DIII's audio limitations, and the lack of an electronic viewfinder. I usually work in bright, controlled light. So the small sensor of the GH4 was not an issue.

I will probably stick with Micro Four Thirds as my platform of choice. It's only going to get better, and I'm only going to get older and want to carry less. I carried a 42 lb. bag of Nikons and lenses and filters and flashes and film and batteries and... back when I was in my 20s. That got old, however. My need then was full frame slides for projection to huge screen sizes, and that kit was great for it. My need now is for images to use in letter-size booklets and PDFs of those booklets, plus video clips that reside on corporate web sites, plus personal work (portraits, still life work, travel...). I don't need full frame or APS-C gear for that. I made 700 exposures at my niece's wedding last April, and liked 500 of them, a shocking yield for me! I was used to 1 of 6 with older gear. So I'm set...
Let's see: br br 1968 --- borrowed a Canon FX br ... (show quote)


Well said. Old guy :>) Carry less, capture images even if not "true" 35mm - which some persons on this UHH seem to be obsessed with.

Reply
 
 
Feb 10, 2017 02:40:15   #
kb6kgx Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
EdJames81 wrote:
what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?


I’m a Nikon guy. Why? Because that’s what my dad had, and I inherited his Nikon F when he decided it was too bulky and replaced it with an FE. I later had an FE2 and now a D7100.

But my first “real” camera was an Agfa-Karat. Manual everything. It didn’t even have a light meter.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 07:20:48   #
Psergel Loc: New Mexico
 
EdJames81 wrote:
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I went with an open mind, but after trying out some of the entry level models I decided to settle on the Canon 450d. I liked the way it felt in the hand, I liked the layout of the buttons and I found it user friendly.

Over time I invested in Canon glass (many L series lenses) and accessories so when it came to upgrade it seemed natural to stay with Canon. Besides changing over to another brand would have cost a fortune.

Had my entry level dslr been the Nikon D3300 I would be shooting Nikon, had it been the Olympus I would now be shooting Olympus

I’m interested – what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I wen... (show quote)


Basically the same thing that made you go with Canon made me go with Canon.

I read a bunch of review of entry level DSLRs then I went to Best Buy and handled the cameras on my short list. The canon felt right in my hand, the controls seemed logically placed and the menu system seemed intuitive.
The nikon felt awkward and unnecessarily complex to me.

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 09:05:00   #
Archiefamous Loc: Manhattan
 
First SLR was a canon ft ql that I loved using but it scratched the film. Camera was ent back for warranty repair with no resolution. Switched eventually Nikon F2as and never looked back. Then F3 F4 F5 F6 d200 now d800. This development was also sprinkles with hasselblad and Leica. I still own almost every camera I ever bought except for Nikon fe

Reply
Feb 10, 2017 10:21:56   #
beorn80 Loc: Battle Creek, Michigan
 
I still have my srt 101,and201, a200 I think,aperture preferred adjustments,then a autofocus ,now Sony A33, then present A65.Always happy with minolta/Sony.All work super to this day tons of old nice minolta manual lens to me ,not spouse ! Lol !All nice to look at in my showcase of photo stuff. A77 or 99 series on the radar then done!!!Stay Blessed All!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 11 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.