Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What made you choose the brand of camera you use?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 11 next> last>>
Feb 9, 2017 08:27:49   #
plessner Loc: North Dakota
 
When I went digital I had no idea what camera I wanted. That year all the photo magazines were calling the Sony A100 the camera of the year--so that's what I went with. Now a number of lenses and a few upgrades later I am still a Sony shooter

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:30:25   #
Impressionist
 
First SLR was a Minolta 202. It got stolen after eight years. Stayed with Minolta and got a X700. Financial times got better and steady. I was able to get a XD-11 and Canon A-1. Have since gotten Nikon FM2n titanium. A Minolta 5ds and several Sonys after along with Nikon 7200. Last my Sony a6000 which with adapters brought most of my old glass back to life. Found a Minolta 202 in mint condition and Wow. The Minolta allowed me to build a system and family. The a6000 got me in touch with my collection. There is better out there but wouldn't have been as complete. Address situation, desire for growth, and a person should come up with a solution that will serve them well.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:33:21   #
Jeffers
 
I am very good with Photoshop Elements which can do wonders with images. So when I bought my current camera I had five criteria:
1. It had to fit in my pocket like a cell phone
2. It had to have a good Auto mode
3. It had have decent Zoom capability
4. It had to have an automatic lens cover
5. It had to be inexpensive enough that if I lost it, it wouldn't be a big deal.
I bought a Canon Powershot ELPH34HS and I love it. You can get it on Amazon for about $225.
Upsides:
a. It's easy to use and generally takes good images
b. You can set the aspect ratio to fit your needs - like the aspect ratio of your electronic picture frame
c. Lapse time from button push to snap is pretty short
d. It takes excellent videos. I have some Ziplining shots that friends think were taken with a GoPro.
Downsides:
a. In Auto mode it has Flash Auto or Flash off - No Flash On. I use Elements to fix backlit images.
b. It doesn't have an optical viewfinder, just the electronic image finder. But it's 16 Megapixels. I've learned to point and shoot, then crop my result as necessary.
The purists will cringe at this but I've taken a lot of great shots with simple, highly flexible camera.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2017 08:42:13   #
steve03 Loc: long Lsland
 
I retired and was doing a lot of backpacking and wanted a camera to record what I was doing. So I went to Target and Nikon d 40 was on sale.My father and brother were photographers and Nikon men so I bought one and have been a Nikon user ever since.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:43:44   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
burkphoto wrote:
Let's see:

1968 --- borrowed a Canon FX
1969 --- bought a Nikkormat FTn
1970 --- had a Yashicamat 124G at school
1971 --- inherited a Nikon FTN
1979 --- had a Nikon FM at work
1979 --- had a Camerz Classic long roll portrait camera at work
1980 --- had a Yashicamat 124G at work
1981 --- added a Nikon F3 at work
1983 --- added a Calumet 4x5 at work
1985 --- added a pin-registered F3 body at work
1986 --- added a Bronica ETRSi at work
1986 --- added a Canon A-1
1996 --- added a Camerz ZII long roll portrait camera at work
2002 --- added a Nikon D100 at work
2003 --- added a Nikon D70 at work
2004 --- added a Canon 20D at work
2005 --- added a Canon 30D at work
2006 --- added a Canon 5D at work
2007 --- added a Canon 40D at work
2009 --- added a Canon 50D at work
2010 --- added a Canon 7D at work

2012 --- started training project management consulting... looked at everything out there for three years... Waited until someone built what I needed...

2015 --- bought a Panasonic Lumix GH4

There were many, many reasons to buy or use a particular camera along the way. I was brand loyal to Canon and Nikon for decades, and for different reasons.

I bought the GH4 for its balance of features... I do a mix of video and stills, and the GH4 is absolutely perfect for that. When I was at Herff Jones Photography, I had a Nikon D70 and a Canon EOS Dxx of some sort (see above). I also had a separate, heavy Canon GL2 video camera. It drove me crazy that the color of the video and the color of the still camera NEVER matched. It drove me crazy to use three completely different cameras with different menu structures, different lenses, different everything. It drove me crazy to use CF Cards and tape!

The GH4 has solved all that. One bag with two LED lights, two mics, a body, two lenses, spare batteries and SD cards, gray card, ColorChecker, two shoe-mount flashes... and it fits under an airline seat! Add my iPhone 7 Plus to the mix, and that's a guerrilla training content development kit.

The GH4 is 1/4 the size, bulk and weight of a full frame kit, and 1/3 the size, bulk, and weight of an APS-C kit, similarly configured. It has more depth of field at a given aperture, which is usually a GOOD thing for documenting processes. It performs satisfactorily in every respect for the purpose I intended it for when I bought it. The ergonomics are first rate. The body is solid, die-cast Titanium, with weather sealing throughout. The lens OIS is great.

I have the 12-35mm f/2.8 weather-sealed pro zoom and the 35-100mm f/2.8 weather-sealed pro zoom, both of which are light, sharp, and great performers. I know I can get any kind of lens I need to put on the GH4 body, because there are around 90 Micro Four Thirds lenses. Adapters fit just about any full frame lens on it, from the likes of Canon, Nikon, Sony, Alpa, Contarex, Contax, and others.

I can record excellent 4K video, from which I can extract matching 8.2MP JPEGs. Or, I can record video and separate, full resolution matching JPEGs. Or, I can record raw images, and raw plus JPEG images. The options let me do what I need to do.

If I did something else ā€” some other kind of photography ā€” I would have bought something else. Every system is a compromise of some sort. You give up the strengths of some other system to get the strengths you need for the work you do most.

There is plenty of information available on the Internet these days, between YouTube and review sites. You can know every feature about a camera, even download the manual, before you buy or rent to try. I read the reviews and skimmed the manuals of the top choices I had. I tried the GH4 and instantly knew that was "it." I had tried a Sony A6000, and a Fujifilm X-Pro1, and an Olympus OM-D EM-1, each of which was strong in other areas, but none of which had what I needed.

I knew, from borrowing a Canon 5DIII, that the video was good in low light, but average in good light. And I hated the 5DIII's audio limitations, and the lack of an electronic viewfinder. I usually work in bright, controlled light. So the small sensor of the GH4 was not an issue.

I will probably stick with Micro Four Thirds as my platform of choice. It's only going to get better, and I'm only going to get older and want to carry less. I carried a 42 lb. bag of Nikons and lenses and filters and flashes and film and batteries and... back when I was in my 20s. That got old, however. My need then was full frame slides for projection to huge screen sizes, and that kit was great for it. My need now is for images to use in letter-size booklets and PDFs of those booklets, plus video clips that reside on corporate web sites, plus personal work (portraits, still life work, travel...). I don't need full frame or APS-C gear for that. I made 700 exposures at my niece's wedding last April, and liked 500 of them, a shocking yield for me! I was used to 1 of 6 with older gear. So I'm set...
Let's see: br br 1968 --- borrowed a Canon FX br ... (show quote)


First and all of 'em!

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:44:04   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Over the years it has been Nikon my primary camera gear.
In 1962 I bought a Konica camera with a 50mm lens. Although that 50mm lens was very good and the camera was well built and had one of the first metal shutters I had been fascinated owning a Nikon since the SP rangefinder model debuted in 1957. At the time I did not have the money to buy the SP and it was in 1963 that my wife bought me the Nikon F, a camera that served me well and I still own.
Over the years reliability and service have been good and today I have a pretty good assortment of old and new lenses.
Modern cameras in general are excellent and so are their lenses. Like you I could easily go with Canon, Pentax, Olympus or Sony but as you said it is not worth it since I have to start all over again.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:45:35   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
nitrophil wrote:
My first film camera was a Pentax Spotmatic, I loved it and have since bought several, I still have 3 of them, so when it came to a DSLR, the Pentax was a no-brainer, I have 2 of those. For me, there is no other brand, I'm a Pentax guy for life.


Well there are at least two Pentax fans on here...

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2017 08:48:47   #
edhjr Loc: Needham, MA
 
Bought my first camera - a Nikkormat -- in Pleiku, Vietnam in 1966. No reason ro change brands since then! Now Nikon D5, D500, D810, D800, AW1 underwater camera and a Lumix zs60 for a pocket camera

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:49:28   #
bobmcculloch Loc: NYC, NY
 
WF2B wrote:
My first film slr was a Miranda Sensorex. When that gave up the ghost, I replaced it with a Canon Rebel, so when I went to DSLR I chose a Canon XTi since I already had Canon lenses. Never looked back. I now have both a 60D and a 6D.
Bud


My first SLR was also a Miranda, a G , then I had a Sensomat and a Sensorex, all well used good cameras, my kids learned on them, always wanted a Canon, esp the F1, aside from Miranda the best feeling in my hands and the F1 the best system at the time, and I had my choice of handling and checking out the cameras as at the time I was a Photo Retail Manager, always felt that Canon made the best camera for the money, I have owned others , to fill in gaps that Canon didn't have , from a Crown graphic down to a Ricoh Hi-Color 35 and two Minolta 16's.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:49:53   #
RKL349 Loc: Connecticut
 
My first camera was a Yashica TL-Super that was given to me. When I wanted to upgrade, I tried out a friend's Nikon in the late 70's, early 80ms and started with a Nikon FG. Been with Nikon ever since.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 08:51:29   #
dickparkans Loc: Arizona
 
30 years ago, I was using Canon. Then Nikon came out with cameras that has a 1/250 second flash sync and I sold everything and went with Nikon. Been that was ever since, except for point and shoot cameras. I liked the G series Canon. Not very happy with the G-16. The pictures are not as good as they should be. I am interested in the Sony A6000. I have heard some very good things about that camera from a friend.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2017 09:11:14   #
Morning Star Loc: West coast, North of the 49th N.
 
EdJames81 wrote:
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I went with an open mind, but after trying out some of the entry level models I decided to settle on the Canon 450d. I liked the way it felt in the hand, I liked the layout of the buttons and I found it user friendly.

Over time I invested in Canon glass (many L series lenses) and accessories so when it came to upgrade it seemed natural to stay with Canon. Besides changing over to another brand would have cost a fortune.

Had my entry level dslr been the Nikon D3300 I would be shooting Nikon, had it been the Olympus I would now be shooting Olympus

Iā€™m interested ā€“ what was it that made you choose the brand of camera you use?
When I went looking for my first dslr camera I wen... (show quote)


Almost exactly the same route you took: My first digital camera was an Olympus - a gift from my husband; Second digital camera, when I had"outgrown" the first one, also Olympus, also gift from my husband. I am now on my fifth Olympus camera and think I will stick with that brand.
I have tried other brands from time to time (borrowed from friends or relatives when the opportunity was there), but even in comparison, I have always been happy with my Oly!

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 09:14:06   #
Jack 13088 Loc: Central NY
 
First real camera was a hand me down from my father Argus C2 (C3 w/o flash sync). Prewar like myself. First SLR was Honeywell Pentax H1a. Then added a Leica M3 (best camera ever made). When I wanted to ditch awkward screw mount lenses I picked Nikon. Why? I don't actually remember. Let's go with the devil made me do it. But now I am invested in a lens system. (I don't use any of the original lenses anymore). D70s was first DSLR and now D7100 is second and latest. I am not exactly a gear collector!

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 09:27:11   #
RKL349 Loc: Connecticut
 
Morning Star wrote:
Almost exactly the same route you took: My first digital camera was an Olympus - a gift from my husband; Second digital camera, when I had"outgrown" the first one, also Olympus, also gift from my husband. I am now on my fifth Olympus camera and think I will stick with that brand.
I have tried other brands from time to time (borrowed from friends or relatives when the opportunity was there), but even in comparison, I have always been happy with my Oly!


Just recently added a Olympus to my collection, primarily for travel. Very happy so far. I am not advanced enough to find any faults with their system.

Reply
Feb 9, 2017 09:33:52   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
Dngallagher wrote:
First SLR was a Minolta SRT 101 - had several lenses with it - great camera. Years later had to buy a Nikon - maybe because of Paul Simon? :) My first DSLR had to be a Nikon too... no thought of anything else.


labels labels labels

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.