Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Natural selection doesn't create!
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Sep 24, 2015 02:40:29   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Definition of Intelligent Design
What is intelligent design?
Intelligent design refers to a scientific research program as well as a community of scientists, philosophers and other scholars who seek evidence of design in nature. The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. Through the study and analysis of a system's components, a design theorist is able to determine whether various natural structures are the product of chance, natural law, intelligent design, or some combination thereof. Such research is conducted by observing the types of information produced when intelligent agents act. Scientists then seek to find objects which have those same types of informational properties which we commonly know come from intelligence. Intelligent design has applied these scientific methods to detect design in irreducibly complex biological structures, the complex and specified information content in DNA, the life-sustaining physical architecture of the universe, and the geologically rapid origin of biological diversity in the fossil record during the Cambrian explosion approximately 530 million years ago.

Is intelligent design a scientific theory?
YES!. The scientific method is commonly described as a four-step process involving observations, hypothesis, experiments, and conclusion. Intelligent design begins with the observation that intelligent agents produce complex and specified information (CSI). Design theorists hypothesize that if a natural object was designed, it will contain high levels of CSI. Scientists then perform experimental tests upon natural objects to determine if they contain complex and specified information. One easily testable form of CSI is irreducible complexity, which can be discovered by experimentally reverse-engineering biological structures to see if they require all of their parts to function. When ID researchers find irreducible complexity in biology, they conclude that such structures were designed.

http://www.intelligentdesign.org/whatisid.php

So YES! Intelligent Design is based on science and is Observable and testable.
b Definition of Intelligent Design /b br What is... (show quote)


Unintelligent design is just a nonsense bullshit idea. There is no science involved, just bullshit and more bullshit. "Unintelligent design is a scientific research program", What a load of shit. There is no proof now nor has there ever been any thing even resembling proof of unintelligent design and there will never, ever be any proof, its just bullshit. Rac is a lunatic creationist and thats that. http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/

Reply
Sep 24, 2015 03:22:47   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
THE END......TRUTH WINS OVER DARWINISM ONCE AGAIN!! God bless to all!

Reply
Sep 24, 2015 03:34:55   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
Racmanaz wrote:
THE END......TRUTH WINS OVER DARWINISM ONCE AGAIN!! God bless to all!
Your wish to make it so, does not make it so..........

Reply
 
 
Sep 24, 2015 08:23:33   #
LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley
 
Racmanaz wrote:
THE END......TRUTH WINS OVER DARWINISM ONCE AGAIN!! God bless to all!


slocumeddie wrote:
Your wish to make it so, does not make it so..........





True non the less

Reply
Sep 24, 2015 10:17:44   #
James Shaw
 
Quote:
Wellhiem wrote:
I can refute and have refuted everything you say. I can't refute it in terms you will understand, because you refuse to understand the basics. You're like a kid that wants to build a car, without learning about the wheel.
Racmanaz wrote:
You have never refuted anything I postef, you only reject what I post. Only thing you do is ask more questions about what I post instead of answering the question itself. so you try and attempt to divert that question to me instead of answering the question yourself. Creating more questions about my post instead of refuting it and answering it is not a victory on your part.

Rac, most of what you post is "rejected" all of the time, because most of what you post is total nonsense.

Reply
Sep 24, 2015 10:23:24   #
James Shaw
 
Racmanaz wrote:
THE END......TRUTH WINS OVER DARWINISM ONCE AGAIN!! God bless to all!

Thanks, God, for giving us the brains to come up with the theory of evolution, so we can better investigate and understand how all of the various and beautiful forms of life came to be on this planet.

And thanks for allowing us to recognize those like Rac, for what they are, for constantly attempting to denigrate your beautiful mechanism in the eyes of others.

Please give us the wisdom to take care of and not waste away our planet's life-string and beauty. - Amen.

Reply
Sep 24, 2015 11:36:08   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Wellhiem wrote:
Because there is no information in it to refute. It's shit.


I'll say one thing for this board...it is certainly entertaining. Between the ridiculous Obamaddicts like Idaholover, SBW and Checkmate and the religious zealots like our resident imbecile Rac and his co-conspirators Steve and Ken Hubert there is no end to 3 Stooges-like entertainment.

Reply
 
 
Sep 24, 2015 12:30:12   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
THE END......TRUTH WINS OVER DARWINISM ONCE AGAIN!! God bless to all!


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you lose.http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/

Reply
Dec 24, 2016 02:29:53   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwinian type of evolution, I think Darwinists do not understand natural selection and it's limitations. Natural selection can only operate on what already exists, it does not have the ability to generate new genetic information to create new body plans or body parts, that's not what natural selection does. Natural selection only has the ability to increase the efficiency of an already existing body structure or eliminate that function, it can not create anything. Natural selection does not have foresight into the future to know how to build anything new genetically. In order to build something new, you need to devise a plan for future construction..that takes an intelligent mind, Natural selection can not see into the future to know how to build complex organisms and structures. Darwinism type natural selection has never been observed, tested nor repeated, therefore it is not based on scientific evidence, it's based purely on over active imaginations.

Reply
Dec 24, 2016 12:56:06   #
LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley
 
True, that

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.