Natural selection doesn't create!
Sep 28, 2014 04:45:33 #
Sep 28, 2014 05:20:16 #
Sep 29, 2014 12:47:58 #
Sep 22, 2015 15:02:00 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Not humorous at all. Quite ridiculous. The guy presenting this video shows no knowledge of evolution, but attempts to ridicule evolution by being trite about "natural selection."
Ridiculous video. Just another pathetic attempt by Rac to draw attention, in a very negative way, to evolution.
In my opinion, it is not worth watching. It is NOT science. It is biased, and is so obviously an attempt to ridicule evolution, which by the way is a scientific theory in good standing and has been for the last 150 years.
The guy presenting the video is a clown, but not one who is "humorous."
Sep 22, 2015 15:11:55 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwinian type of evolution, I think Darwinists do not understand natural selection and it's limitations. Natural selection can only operate on what already exists, it does not have the ability to generate new genetic information to create new body plans or body parts, that's not what natural selection does. Natural selection only has the ability to increase the efficiency of an already existing body structure or eliminate that function, it can not create anything. Natural selection does not have foresight into the future to know how to build anything new genetically. In order to build something new, you need to devise a plan for future construction..that takes an intelligent mind, Natural selection can not see into the future to know how to build complex organisms and structures. Darwinism type natural selection has never been observed, tested nor repeated, therefore it is not based on scientific evidence, it's based purely on over active imaginations. :)
Sep 22, 2015 15:23:47 #
Racmanaz wrote:
b Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwin... (show quote)
Rac, couldn't be MORE WRONG, as Natural Selection is an integral part of evolution.
Rac's words:
Natural selection only has the ability to increase the efficiency of an already existing body structure......
A totally and absolutely ridiculous false statement.
Rac, you would think by now that you would know the difference between science and superstition, and that you would know the mechanism of evolution, but you still haven't a clue on any of these issues.
Rac, you need to do serious work on all of these issues!
Sep 22, 2015 15:24:29 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
Racmanaz wrote:
b Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwin... (show quote)
AAAHHH yes, rac and his crap. http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/
Sep 22, 2015 15:29:14 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwinian type of evolution, I think Darwinists do not understand natural selection and it's limitations. Natural selection can only operate on what already exists, it does not have the ability to generate new genetic information to create new body plans or body parts, that's not what natural selection does. Natural selection only has the ability to increase the efficiency of an already existing body structure or eliminate that function, it can not create anything. Natural selection does not have foresight into the future to know how to build anything new genetically. In order to build something new, you need to devise a plan for future construction..that takes an intelligent mind, Natural selection can not see into the future to know how to build complex organisms and structures. Darwinism type natural selection has never been observed, tested nor repeated, therefore it is not based on scientific evidence, it's based purely on over active imaginations. <<<<nobody can refute this truth, their only response is ridicule and to apply their empty objections. :)
Sep 22, 2015 15:39:00 #
silver
Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
Racmanaz wrote:
b Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwin... (show quote)
HAHAHAHAHA more rac crap!!!!!!!! http://thewaronbullshit.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/
Sep 22, 2015 19:28:39 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Rac, you would think by now you would understand how nature and genes work but, clearly, your words above indicate that you haven't a clue. You really need to work on that. b Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwin... (show quote)
Sep 22, 2015 19:42:17 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Rac. If you're going to continue posting this shit, learn something about it.
44 Reasons Creationists are Deceptive.
Part 1.
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/44-reasons-creationists-are-deceptive/
Part 2
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/44-reasons-creationists-are-deceptive-cont/
That covers the first 12.
I'll post links to the rest as they're published.
Sep 22, 2015 19:53:37 #
Racmanaz wrote:
b Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwin... (show quote)
Rac. Your computer works with ones and zeros. That's it. It's all ones and zeros. Every picture you look at, every video you watch, every spread sheet or database you use. It's all ones and zeros. It doesn't produce anything new. It can only generate more ones and zeros. When you install a new piece of software, it doesn't create anything new in your computer, it just tells it to arrange those ones and zeros into a different order. It's the same with DNA. Okay I'll admit it's not exactly the same, DNA adapts to it's external environment, so you don't have to have a CD inserted into your arse. And DNA is a base 4 system. But apart from that, it's the same thing.
Sep 22, 2015 19:55:38 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Repeating the same ridiculous, non-credible, non-substantiated and irrational thing over-and-over-again is not a way to convince rational others. b Natural selection has nothing to do with Darwin... (show quote)
Rac, you are "truth-less," irrational and foolish.
Sep 22, 2015 20:10:01 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Wellhiem wrote:
So you're weak response is to denigrate the information instead of actually addressing the information calling it s*** doesn't make it s*** why don't you try refuting the information that's in it?
Sep 22, 2015 20:12:08 #
Wellhiem wrote:
I had difficulty finding Part 1, but found your Part 1 here:
http://www.politicalforum.com/religion-philosophy/425786-44-reasons-creationists-deceptive.html
Rac would do well to read it, but even if he did I doubt he would understand a word of it, as he pretends what is.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.