Les look at your rhetorical question a bit differently. No matter what level of skill a professional possesses, he is a surrogate for someone who is paying him. Why should he have any expectations that he is more important than those of the "mob". This may be appropriate for a wedding where he is hired by someone who is paying for an event. As a general statement, however, why should a professional have any preference not offered by anything but his own sense of arrogance and entitlement.

I find the find the various perspectives and opinions on “Professional photographers vs. GWC” interesting. I am not sure why there is such a fissure about it though. It does become an emotional issue for some maybe because it is indicative of the narrowing or bridging in the ability to create quality images, both artistic and editorial, that can be attained by “amateurs”. There are remarkable tools and technologies that are now readily available that help automate and guide novice enthusiasts in the complexities of the exposure triangle, editing in post, and finding an audience to share their work. As recent as 20 years ago there was a much higher barrier to entry in creating images that could be monetized through a commercial transaction. That barrier existed not only because of the cost associated of professional grade film cameras and high quality processing, but with the knowledge, patience, experience and passion required to really excel in the craft. The process of creating images was not validated through instant gratification but by perfecting many individual tasks in the value chain. Artistry and creativity as well as technical knowledge were required to consistently produce high quality images in the volume and velocity required to make it a vocation - to make your living from it.

I am not a professional photographer and never will be. But I love photography. I work at it, I study it, I practice it and more often than not I fail at it. I will never make a dime by selling any of my images, but like everything else I pursue in my life, I really want to get good at it. I will never be on the stage at the Warfield playing guitar, but I have invested in very high quality instruments and take lessons because I love music. I will never be in the Tour de France but I am an avid cyclist and continually want to improve. I doubt very highly that Eric Clapton or Chris Froome hold any animus towards me (or any amateur) for trying to gain proficiency in their vocations that have made them millionaires. It’s just about trying to do your best in everything you attempt, whether it is your career or your hobby. Luckily, I am good enough at my job to provide the resources needed to allow me to pursue some hobbies.

It probably will be harder to make a living in the future by creating and selling images. Modern technology has relegated centuries old staples like newspapers and magazines to be essentially obsolete. Content is provided to a larger audience through omni-channel digital distribution. Modern manufacturing processes have all but eliminated specialized building crafts. There are many software tools available that can make a novice look like a professional web developer. The examples of technology displacing craftsmen are vast. There are many lost arts due to technology innovation and automation. The UHH is a good example of social media that can be used to widely disseminate ideas and principles that were once shared by a much more narrow audience. This share economy has done as much to level the output of professionals and non-professionals as has photographic technology. I do believe, however, that truly creative, dedicated and hard working individuals can separate themselves from the masses with cameras and provide products that can be of very high value. We are now in a share economy but artistry and creativity will always be coveted.

Now for the question of rudeness and narcissism in our culture, I am always hopeful that civility and manners will prevail. The outlook doesn’t look good though.