reevescm011552 wrote:
I am new to this hobby. I would like to explore options on equipment - i.e. - brands, etc. - which is best? - Nikon, Canon, Pentax, others? - looking to purchase something soon - but so many choices. Looking between DSLR - Nikon - D3100, D3200, D3300, D5100, etc., etc. - or Canon EOS - as I say so many choices? - Where do I start and what should I look for? Looking for general photography - exploring options on which direction I would like to go.
Would appreciate any pointers? Thank you.
Great question! This reminds me of someone I knew in business, meeting with an Internet web site designer for the first time in 1995. He said, "We know we *need* a web site. But, um, what is that?"
Well, if you don't know what it is, how do you know you need it?
Before you go shopping for cameras, know what you want to photograph! That should shape your decisions as much as a hands-on trial of several different bodies and lenses.
Different gear is suited to different uses. Some cameras perform best for sports action and wildlife. Others perform best for portraiture. Others make excellent video, which might be a factor for you. It's a huge factor for me, as I want one system to do everything.
As far as brands go, various people will hate me for saying this, but they're ALL pretty good right now, and it boils down to *personal choice of what is best for YOU and your needs.* You can head over to
www.dpreview.com for some really detailed test reports of the more popular cameras and lenses, but you should also go try them, and look for other forums, and read as many comments from users as you can.
It might be the best brand on the planet, by someone's tests, but if it does not feel right in your hands, or work naturally for you, will you want to use it?
In my own 46 years of serious photography, I started with Canon, switched to Nikon a year later, and used Canon, Nikon, Yashica, Bronica, and Mamiya in my film days. Each had distinct advantages and annoyances.
Since digital came out, I have used both Nikon and Canon. I prefer each for different purposes. From my perspective, Canon bodies have better handling, menus, and ergonomics. Their computer tethering software comes with the camera, free of extra charge. I like their pro quality lenses, but I like Nikkors just as well. And I like certain Tamron lenses on both platforms.
Nikons tend to have better sensors, hence better low light performance, but I seldom use ISOs higher than 3200. In my experience, Nikon gear tends to be more rugged, but that's not a huge factor for me any longer.
These days, I'm a HUGE fan of Panasonic's Lumix GH4, and the entire family of Micro Four Thirds lenses, especially the Lumix "Holy Trinity" of 7-14mm f/4, 12-35mm f/2.8, and 35-100mm f/2.8. Leica makes some primes for this camera format, too, and inspired many of Panasonic's designs, so lens selection for the m43 format is excellent.
The primary advantages to the GH4 are size, bulk, and weight savings, coupled with the very best video performance of any camera in its price range, and excellent still photography performance. Unless you are a sports and wildlife still photographer, or for you, life begins in "available darkness", you don't need APS/C or DX or "full frame" cameras. Micro Four Thirds is gaining popularity quickly, and has significant appeals to those with small hands, large travel budgets, and a need to avoid bulk and weight.
Probably the best advice I can give you isn't about equipment, though, since that is a highly personal choice. It's about learning, the importance of understanding the basics of photography, and how that knowledge can help you capture anything with confidence. What ever you do, read your camera manual!
Consider the following:
ISO, shutter speeds, and f/stops control exposure. Change one, and you must change one of the other two to compensate, as the sensor needs a specific amount of light to capture a "correct" exposure of any subject. ("Correct" can be relative to your interpretation of the scene.)
Camera meters are calibrated to see the world as reflecting 18% of all colors, equally (photographic gray). Point them at white, and they will provide readings that underexpose. Point them at black, they will provide readings that overexpose. Point at an average scene, or a gray target, and you will get correct exposure.
Cameras sense the color of light and set white balance the same way. Point them at white, black, or gray, and they see color correctly. Point them at red, and they set a scene balance of cyan. Point them at green, and the scene balance goes magenta. Point them at blue, and the scene balance goes yellow.
RAW and JPEG capture modes have entirely different purposes. RAW provides the potential to extract the best quality from an image later, in software. JPEG uses the camera pre-sets to process a scene from RAW to a finished file in the camera. It provides instantly usable images, but only if you discipline yourself to pre-set the camera properly! My advice? Always apply that discipline, even when using RAW, and you will always come away with images you can use.
These are but a small sampling of concepts that need your consideration as you learn. This is a good forum. But there are many others. Consider joining a local camera club or Meetup group to learn more.
Above all else, once you get some gear, use it! You'll learn as much from your mistakes and experience as you will from reading, studying, and listening.