reevescm011552 wrote:
I am new to this hobby. I would like to explore options on equipment - i.e. - brands, etc. - which is best? - Nikon, Canon, Pentax, others? - looking to purchase something soon - but so many choices. Looking between DSLR - Nikon - D3100, D3200, D3300, D5100, etc., etc. - or Canon EOS - as I say so many choices? - Where do I start and what should I look for? Looking for general photography - exploring options on which direction I would like to go.
Would appreciate any pointers? Thank you.
Think of it this way. Take the pressure off yourself and just buy any good brand name ENTRY LEVEL DSLR or Mirrorless. Don't buy a bunch of lenses for the first year.
Do take the suggestion to try to find a place where you can hold a few for feel. It's pretty amazing what feels right when you run across it.
Then, start building photographic skills with the camera. Things like exposure and composition, which aren't necessarily a function of camera brand, because along with those you will need to spend time learning how to use the specific camera you buy... how controls and menus work... etc.
The reason I propose this is that specific brands make no big difference. All the manufacturers with names you know build good camera's. There is no BEST. And it is about marketing if you let it be, or leave it to advice from others. The reference responses you get here are not always objective. Some are biased and subjective, and are the first level of marketing. Some simply want you to make the same choice they did. That's selling (marketing) as much as any huge budget for advertising employed by the various camera manufacturers.
If you just buy a camera and get started, you will likely find this to be your experience.
After about one year, you will discover the suitability, or lack there of in your first camera.
I'm suggesting that, as so many here have found, your first camera will very likely NOT BE your last camera, and you may find that out at about the end of one year.
If you minimize your spending for the first year... entry level and the kit lens, you'll know more about what you want than any of us can tell you. By minimizing the amount spent, you won't be married to a platform, ie. lots of expensive glass holding you to a camera platform you may not wish for a year from now.
I expect to be flamed out of the park on this. Some may suggest buy the biggest and the best and you will progress faster.
That could be the case for some. But these camera's and equipment are truly a real "money pit" if you think throwing big bucks at the equipment will make you a better photographer.
Think of it this way. Buy a camera, use it for a year, and you will know more than we can tell you about your own progression into photography.
Get photography, the craft, under your belt first. Then worry about the best equipment.
Most of the best NASCAR drivers started out with Destruction Derby cars, and did the work necessary to move up to the cars that, as a tool, help them win the races.
In the history of photography, most of the best images came from a dark box, with a simple lens on the front, and a surface on the back to hold the capture media on the back. Other than that it was the photographers eye, and creative vision, combined with the processes afterward to massage the media to the final image.
I will close by saying the market position of every camera manufacturer WAS a function of marketing, more than anything else. The popularity of any product is "bought and paid for" through mass media advertising.
So to finalize my opinion on this, go feel a few, buy one, get a good nights sleep, and start shooting at first light tomorrow.